Election 2012--Simplified and Made Easy

[Johnny Tremain]

The upcoming election can easily be simplified and explained--even for a small child to understand:

DO YOU WANT FOUR MORE​

YEARS OF THIS SHIT?​

 

[Cruella]

Wasn't that Reagan's line?

 

[Johnny Tremain]

Wasn't that Reagan's line?

More or less--

 

[dogtowner]

removal of standards on their achievement ? something for nothing ? of course small children want that.

children and non tax payers dont care that govt spending is a horrendous % of GDP. The point needs to be made to ALL TAXPAYERS that they are under assault so that every single one votes against Obama and then hope to demonstrate to the rest how we're on course to be Greece, Italy and Spain (all those gimmes going away).

time for America to grow up. been acting like children too long.

 

[Johnny Tremain]

removal of standards on their achievement ? something for nothing ? of course small children want that.

children and non tax payers dont care that govt spending is a horrendous % of GDP. The point needs to be made to ALL TAXPAYERS that they are under assault so that every single one votes against Obama and then hope to demonstrate to the rest how we're on course to be Greece, Italy and Spain (all those gimmes going away).

time for America to grow up. been acting like children too long.

100% agreement!

 

[Johnny Tremain]

Shall we vote for a good man--and another good man--​

or​

a sorry crack-head fraud and phony who has hidden every moment of his life.​

And, his idiot side-kick.​

 

[PLC1]

According to the Cafferty File, an astounding number of Americans are getting welfare of some sort:

More than 100 million people in the United States of America get welfare from the federal government. 100 million.

That's a third of the country!

But the questions are:

Is that number attributable to Obama policies? What, specifically, has he advocated that has led to such unsustainable numbers?

And even more importantly:

Is electing Romney going to make much of an impact without also changing Congress?

 

[dogtowner]

According to the Cafferty File, an astounding number of Americans are getting welfare of some sort:



That's a third of the country!

But the questions are:

Is that number attributable to Obama policies? What, specifically, has he advocated that has led to such unsustainable numbers?

And even more importantly:

Is electing Romney going to make much of an impact without also changing Congress?

huge efforts to sign up for food stamps etc.
and, of course, all his actions to defeat recovery.

Ronmey can do a certain aomunt on his own but obviously having a congress will make it a lot easier to make necessary change.

 

[Cruella]

This figure of 100 million people does not include those who only receive Social Security or Medicare.

So the people dependent on government checks is a lot more that 100 people. We have fewer people working today, (than four years ago) when we should be adding 250,000 jobs a month just to cover people coming into the work force?. So our REAL unemployment numbers must be really high. Where is all this money to cover all these government checks supposed to come from if only half the people working even pay any taxes?

 

[PLC1]

So the people dependent on government checks is a lot more that 100 people. We have fewer people working today, (than four years ago) when we should be adding 250,000 jobs a month just to cover people coming into the work force?. So our REAL unemployment numbers must be really high. Where is all this money to cover all these government checks supposed to come from if only half the people working even pay any taxes?

Good question.
Yes, unemployment is really high, much higher than the official 8.3% or so.
Only about half of recent college grads have good, full time jobs. That alone is an eye opening statistic. Add to that a third of Americans on welfare of one sort or another, and who knows how many seniors dependent on SS with no real retirement income, and you have a very scary situation.

 

[Gipper]

Good question.
Yes, unemployment is really high, much higher than the official 8.3% or so.
Only about half of recent college grads have good, full time jobs. That alone is an eye opening statistic. Add to that a third of Americans on welfare of one sort or another, and who knows how many seniors dependent on SS with no real retirement income, and you have a very scary situation.

So true. And who and what is to blame for this economic disaster?

 

[Gipper]

So the people dependent on government checks is a lot more that 100 people. We have fewer people working today, (than four years ago) when we should be adding 250,000 jobs a month just to cover people coming into the work force?. So our REAL unemployment numbers must be really high. Where is all this money to cover all these government checks supposed to come from if only half the people working even pay any taxes?

You know...China.

And as long as the Fed keeps interest rates artificially low and printing lots of phony money, progressive politicians intend to continue doing it while demanding the rich pay their fair share...apparently to idiot progressives the rich paying their fair share is a lot more than what they currently pay, which of course is most of the taxes confiscated.

 

[PLC1]

So true. And who and what is to blame for this economic disaster?

I'd say 1/4 Congress, 1/4 Bush, 1/4 Obama 1/4 private sector greed, roughly.
Failure to regulate the mortgage market, selling people houses they couldn't afford, fighting wars "off budget", bailing out entities too big to fail, giving away money we don't have, and trying to spend our way to prosperity. I'm sure there is more, but that's just off the top of my head.

 

[Johnny Tremain]

With the amount of "college graduates" being cranked out now--their future--is profoundly bleak.
If--they think it means they will automatically start at $75K+, or will "get rich quick".
College does not mean shit anymore--especially since we all--and I mean ALL of us--know, in most cases, it is a false symbol of accomplishment. It is the country club of loser liberal professors who have systematically destroyed higher education in the USA.
The vampire called democrat has been sucking at the neck of the nation till it has become anemic to the point of death.

This will be electrifyingly obvious if Obama wins a second term--business will implode immediately, stagflation will literally skyrocket and the dollar will collapse and a degree of fiscal suffering that will easily eclipse the Great Depression will arrive.

That delicate balance is what the communists (use other euphemistic names if it makes you feel better)--like Obama's PUPPETMASTERS have seen all along. Asians will fill in the bulk of the manufacturing on Earth and the USA will have all those entrepreneurial "cupcake shop owners" to fall back on with a population without cash and wealth. Wages will drop to a level that will have to compete with China Inc.--and pretty much the same thing will happen to Europe.

And no one--I reapeat--no one--will be able to do a goddman thing about it.
It is just the handwriting on the wall--for anyone with any snap and business experience or concept of logic.
And why not?
Buy an American car for $68,000 that is crap or a far superior Asian one for $10,000.
Without the auto industry--we sink like a rock, because it takes down the rest with it.
Game over.

It is almost as if someone thought if they could just find the appropriate Quisling and fund him and then send him in to blow up the guts of America--have him divide the people into seething enemies--before anyone could see the truth and head off the end--and well, maybe that is precisely what has happened.

 

[Gipper]

I'd say 1/4 Congress, 1/4 Bush, 1/4 Obama 1/4 private sector greed, roughly.
Failure to regulate the mortgage market, selling people houses they couldn't afford, fighting wars "off budget", bailing out entities too big to fail, giving away money we don't have, and trying to spend our way to prosperity. I'm sure there is more, but that's just off the top of my head.

Buzzer Sound!!!! Wrong!

The economic disaster can be traced to this: Progressive/Socialist/Keynesian Ideology.

The mortgage market is and was HEAVILY regulated by government. No industry is more regulated than the banking industry and this has been true for DECADES. The government run by foolish libs imposed new rules forcing banks to make bad loans, which benefited mortgage brokers....but what you miss is this all occurred ONLY because GOVERNMENT run by FOOLS made it happen.

Who bailed out the banks, but the foolish progressives running our government.

What philosophy believes government spending will fix the problem? CLUE - it aint Capitalism.