there are some cases in which the convict(s) should be considered for the death penalty because of the atrocity and/or cruelty used in the commission of the crime.
:twocents:
Until real research is done I don't think anyone can say with certainty whether the death penalty is an effective deterrent or not. But that's not the only reason to have one. Some crimes are so heinous that there's no other appropriate course of action.
That said, I don't think the death penalty should be handed out loosely, maybe even just in cases where there's more than one witness or when there's overwhelming evidence. But in those cases I don't think there should be room for someone to sit on death row for decades before the sentence is carried out, if it is at all.