Could Trump reconcile our political dissension well enough to fix America without the Leftist inflaming the stupids into calling him a dictator?

[mark francis]

nah, i call you a science ***** for the stupid posts you make about science - evolution, climate change, etc. not for the reason you gave. duh.

you are a science *****

Evolution is not proven science, but a substitute science theory based on speculations, assumptions, and bad interpretations of data. The same is true about the global warming myth.

 

[pjmret]

Evolution is not proven science, but a substitute science theory based on speculations, assumptions, and bad interpretations of data. The same is true about the global warming myth.

calling it a myth proves you are a science *****.
you make it easy for me. lol

 

[mark francis]

calling it a myth proves you are a science *****.
you make it easy for me. lol

Evolution is a theory, not proven scientific fact.

 

[pjmret]

Evolution is a theory, not proven scientific fact.

Everything really in science is a theory that's how science works and I never said otherwise but you call it words like speculation which is not correct because you are a science *****

 

[mark francis]

Everything really in science is a theory that's how science works and I never said otherwise but you call it words like speculation which is not correct because you are a science *****

Good. We agree. Like God's creation of original life on earth, from the human standpoint evolution is just another unproven theory.

 

[pjmret]

Good. We agree. Like God's creation of original life on earth, from the human standpoint evolution is just another unproven theory.

Religion is outside the scope of science so God creating the earth is not a science theory
You are a science *****

 

[Boris Norris]

Good. We agree. Like God's creation of original life on earth, from the human standpoint evolution is just another unproven theory.

Evolution is a fact and because you cannot prove otherwise is why you hate it so much. Sound familiar?

 

[the annoying thing]

no.
he's too much of a hateful egotist to do that.
all he wants to do is to pander to his base so they adore him.
he has shown zero interest in reconciling anything.
even suggesting he might shows you are incapable of understanding simple history. lol

Pander to his base lol like Joe Biden panders to criminals illegals drug dealers tranny's and Muslims BLM and Antifa.

 

[mark francis]

Religion is outside the scope of science so God creating the earth is not a science theory
You are a science *****

Sadly, for secularists, evolution is a theologically based theory concocted by a 2nd rate theologian as an alternative to the Biblical record of life created and maintained by God. Darwin was not a scientist. He was too intellectually limited to enroll in science or medicine so he got trained in arts and theology.

Charles Darwin's use of theology in the Origin of Species | The British Journal for the History of Science | Cambridge Core

Charles Darwin's use of theology in the Origin of Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2011

STEPHEN DILLEY
Abstract

This essay examines Darwin's positiva (or positive) use of theology in the first edition of the Origin of Species in three steps. First, the essay analyses the Origin's theological language about God's accessibility, honesty, methods of creating, relationship to natural laws and lack of responsibility for natural suffering; the essay contends that Darwin utilized positiva theology in order to help justify (and inform) descent with modification and to attack special creation. Second, the essay offers critical analysis of this theology, drawing in part on Darwin's mature ruminations to suggest that, from an epistemic point of view, the Origin's positiva theology manifests several internal tensions. Finally, the essay reflects on the relative epistemic importance of positiva theology in the Origin's overall case for evolution. The essay concludes that this theology served as a handmaiden and accomplice to Darwin's science.

 

[mark francis]

Evolution is a fact and because you cannot prove otherwise is why you hate it so much. Sound familiar?

Evolution is not a fact but a theory that nobody can prove, although the ill-educated do not seem to understand that fact.

 

[pjmret]

Evolution is not a fact but a theory that nobody can prove, although the ill-educated do not seem to understand that fact.

says the science *****. lol

 

[pjmret]

Sadly, for secularists, evolution is a theologically based theory concocted by a 2nd rate theologian as an alternative to the Biblical record of life created and maintained by God. Darwin was not a scientist. He was too intellectually limited to enroll in science or medicine so he got trained in arts and theology.

Charles Darwin's use of theology in the Origin of Species | The British Journal for the History of Science | Cambridge Core

Charles Darwin's use of theology in the Origin of Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2011

STEPHEN DILLEY
Abstract
This essay examines Darwin's positiva (or positive) use of theology in the first edition of the Origin of Species in three steps. First, the essay analyses the Origin's theological language about God's accessibility, honesty, methods of creating, relationship to natural laws and lack of responsibility for natural suffering; the essay contends that Darwin utilized positiva theology in order to help justify (and inform) descent with modification and to attack special creation. Second, the essay offers critical analysis of this theology, drawing in part on Darwin's mature ruminations to suggest that, from an epistemic point of view, the Origin's positiva theology manifests several internal tensions. Finally, the essay reflects on the relative epistemic importance of positiva theology in the Origin's overall case for evolution. The essay concludes that this theology served as a handmaiden and accomplice to Darwin's science.

evolution isn't a theologically based theory right now. Its a generally accepted scientific theory based on evidence. duh
you are a science *****.

 

[mark francis]

evolution isn't a theologically based theory right now. Its a generally accepted scientific theory based on evidence. duh
you are a science *****.

Humanistic morons have convinced themselves their theologically based evolution myth is fact rather than fiction.

 

[pjmret]

Humanistic morons have convinced themselves their theologically based evolution myth is fact rather than fiction.

Evolution is not theologically based
You aren't even smart enough to be a science ***** lol

 

[Boris Norris]

Humanistic morons have convinced themselves their theologically based evolution myth is fact rather than fiction.

It is a proven fact but your religion forbids you to accept it. You have never researched anything in the matter but take a Bible as a god given fact.
It doesn't matter if you don't believe it or ridicule it forever. It is still a fact and your still a loser.