California Democrats: 'To hell' with Americans who oppose illegals voting

The story is about a non citizen
Not an illegal
Did God make you this stupid lol
Why are democrats 'fighting like hell' to keep names of non-citizens on voter rolls or to have those names restored if removed from the rolls in required voting roll purges?
 
Werbung:
Why do you think that everything that goes against your beliefs originates with corrupt judges but conveniently forget the the SC judges who abolished rvw and gave Trump immunity, contrary to the constitution?

Why. At least be honest with yourself.
The SCOTUS did not overturn Roe v Wade but simply returned the issue to states where the issue should be decided. Democrats do not like states having freedom to disagree with the leftist majority in the deep state federal swamp.

SCOTUS did not give Trump immunity, the Constitution did.
 
The SCOTUS did not overturn Roe v Wade but simply returned the issue to states where the issue should be decided. Democrats do not like states having freedom to disagree with the leftist majority in the deep state federal swamp.

What about the freedom of woman to have control over their bodies? For states to dictate to women is authoritarianism. Democracy has been taken from the womb and into the Bible.
Abortion is a world wide issue. Not individual states controlled by godbotherers. It can never be successful and will lead to further illegal abortions. They rate of abortions by both religious and atheists has not diminished.
SCOTUS did not give Trump immunity, the Constitution did.
Where in the constitution does it say the POTUS has immunity? If Trump wins the election, Biden has the same immunity. Imagine who he has in mind for Trump.
 
Why are democrats 'fighting like hell' to keep names of non-citizens on voter rolls or to have those names restored if removed from the rolls in required voting roll purges?
its not illegal for non citizens to vote in elections in which they are allowed to vote. voting by non citizens isn't inherently illegal in the constitution.

you are truly stupid. lol
 
What about the freedom of woman to have control over their bodies? For states to dictate to women is authoritarianism. Democracy has been taken from the womb and into the Bible.
Men and women can destroy their own bodies if they choose but they are committing murder if they destroy the body of another human who has not given his consent for them to destroy his body.
Where in the constitution does it say the POTUS has immunity? If Trump wins the election, Biden has the same immunity. Imagine who he has in mind for Trump.

Presidential immunity in the United States​

1 language
Tools




Appearance
hide
Text
  • Small
    Standard
    Large
Width
  • Standard
    Wide
Color (beta)
  • Automatic
    Light
    Dark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A sitting president of the United States has both civil and criminal immunity for their official acts.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_immunity_in_the_United_States#cite_note-1"><span>[</span>a<span>]</span></a> Neither civil nor criminal immunity is explicitly granted in the Constitution or any federal statute.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_immunity_in_the_United_States#cite_note-2"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_immunity_in_the_United_States#cite_note-3"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>

The Supreme Court of the United States found in Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) that the president has absolute immunity from civil damages actions regarding conduct within the "outer perimeter" of their duties. However, in Clinton v. Jones (1997), the court ruled against temporary immunity for sitting presidents from suits arising from pre-presidency conduct. Some scholars have suggested an immunity from arrest and criminal prosecution as well, a view which has become the practice of the Department of Justice under a pair of memoranda (1973 and 2000) from the Office of Legal Counsel. Presidents Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump were criminally investigated while in office, but none were prosecuted while still in office.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_immunity_in_the_United_States#cite_note-trump-6"><span>[</span>b<span>]</span></a> In February 2024, former President Trump claimed absolute immunity from being investigated for any crimes committed while in office. The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. United States (2024) that all presidents have absolute criminal immunity for official acts under core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for other official acts, and no immunity for unofficial acts.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_immunity_in_the_United_States#cite_note-7"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_immunity_in_the_United_States#cite_note-8"><span>[</span>6<span>]</span></a>
 
its not illegal for non citizens to vote in elections in which they are allowed to vote. voting by non citizens isn't inherently illegal in the constitution.

you are truly stupid. lol
Is that right? Can illegal immigrants now vote in US elections by democrat decree?
 
If illegal immigrants could always vote in US elections then why are even democrats claiming no non-Americans are voting in elections because it is illegal?
We've been here before.
They were not illegals. They wouldn't be allowed if they were not certified.

You are deliberately and ignorantly telling lies. Piss off.
 
We've been here before.
They were not illegals. They wouldn't be allowed if they were not certified.

You are deliberately and ignorantly telling lies. Piss off.
Are you saying democrats can declare Illegals legal just like Trump can declassify and keep documents?
 
Are you saying democrats can declare Illegals legal just like Trump can declassify and keep documents?
No. I'm saying if they were eligible to vote, they are not illegal. It's bloody obvious.
You're problem is you think they all vote democrat and you hate them.

Trump had no legal right to steal the documents. There is a process which is law.
Here is a cut from the PRA which clearly states who owns the records.

Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.
 
Werbung:
No. I'm saying if they were eligible to vote, they are not illegal. It's bloody obvious.
You're problem is you think they all vote democrat and you hate them.
That brings us back to the unanswered questions. 1. How did illegal immigrants' names get on voting rolls in the first place, and 2. Why are democrats and judges fighting like hell to keep illegal names on voting rolls?
Trump had no legal right to steal the documents. There is a process which is law.
Here is a cut from the PRA which clearly states who owns the records.
Thousands of pundits have offered all sorts of different opinions about whether a politician can take home secret government documents and store them willy-nilly in garages, in vintage sport cars, in unsecured storage cabinets, in inaccessible university libraries, or stored in offices occupied by foreign spies.
Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.
That does not explain how Biden kept hundreds of documents for decades without permission and in spite of having never been president when he took the documents home with him.
 
Back
Top