California Democrats love this oppressor of businesses and human rights and raiser of taxes

[Gabriel_Bell]

Surely most Californians wished it was not so expensive to keep big spending high taxing Democrats in office.

I bet that Newsome will be reelected, and if not him, someone like him. Who the F are you to tell Californians how to live?

 

[mark francis]

I bet that Newsome will be reelected, and if not him, someone like him. Who the F are you to tell Californians how to live?

I don't care if Californians want to pay the high costs associated with Democrat mismanaged budgeting, but I still say I bet there are millions of Californians who are not pleased with the irrational Democrat policies, wasteful spending, high taxes and oppressive regulations.

 

[pjmret]

Surely most Californians wished it was not so expensive to keep big spending high taxing Democrats in office.

Everyone wishes it wasn't so expensive to live where they live

 

[mark francis]

Everyone wishes it wasn't so expensive to live where they live

At the rate we are going the Cloward Piven Democrat plan might just become reality in our near future. Their plan was to bankrupt America and build a better state from the ruins. It was a stupid plan, but one which Democrats seem to support wholeheartedly with spending measures that will inevitably bankrupt America in spite of all the denials to the contrary.

Cloward–Piven strategy - WikipediaTop of Form​

Strategy[edit]
Cloward and Piven's article is focused on subversively compelling the Democratic Party, which in 1966 controlled the presidency and both houses of the United States Congress, to "redistribute income" to help the poor. They stated that full enrollment of those eligible for welfare "would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments" that would: "...deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas."[5]

They further wrote:

The ultimate objective of this strategy – to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income – will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.[5]

Michael Reisch and Janice Andrews wrote that Cloward and Piven "proposed to create a crisis in the current welfare system – by exploiting the gap between welfare law and practice – that would ultimately bring about its collapse and replace it with a system of guaranteed annual income. They hoped to accomplish this end by informing the poor of their rights to welfare assistance, encouraging them to apply for benefits and, in effect, overloading an already overburdened bureaucracy."[6]

 

[pjmret]

At the rate we are going the Cloward Piven Democrat plan might just become reality in our near future. Their plan was to bankrupt America and build a better state from the ruins. It was a stupid plan, but one which Democrats seem to support wholeheartedly with spending measures that will inevitably bankrupt America in spite of all the denials to the contrary.

Cloward–Piven strategy - WikipediaTop of Form​

Strategy[edit]
Cloward and Piven's article is focused on subversively compelling the Democratic Party, which in 1966 controlled the presidency and both houses of the United States Congress, to "redistribute income" to help the poor. They stated that full enrollment of those eligible for welfare "would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments" that would: "...deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas."[5]

They further wrote:

The ultimate objective of this strategy – to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income – will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.[5]

Michael Reisch and Janice Andrews wrote that Cloward and Piven "proposed to create a crisis in the current welfare system – by exploiting the gap between welfare law and practice – that would ultimately bring about its collapse and replace it with a system of guaranteed annual income. They hoped to accomplish this end by informing the poor of their rights to welfare assistance, encouraging them to apply for benefits and, in effect, overloading an already overburdened bureaucracy."[6]

Might lol
All you have is whining

 

[Boris Norris]

Surely most Californians wished it was not so expensive to keep big spending high taxing Democrats in office.

It would be more logical to think either they are happy to accept that or your claims are incorrect.

You've got a personal hatred of California because of their massive hold on electoral votes. It's a burden on every republican.
More prayers are needed to change that.

 

[Boris Norris]

At the rate we are going the Cloward Piven Democrat plan might just become reality in our near future. Their plan was to bankrupt America and build a better state from the ruins. It was a stupid plan, but one which Democrats seem to support wholeheartedly with spending measures that will inevitably bankrupt America in spite of all the denials to the contrary.

Cloward–Piven strategy - WikipediaTop of Form​

Strategy[edit]
Cloward and Piven's article is focused on subversively compelling the Democratic Party, which in 1966 controlled the presidency and both houses of the United States Congress, to "redistribute income" to help the poor. They stated that full enrollment of those eligible for welfare "would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments" that would: "...deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas."[5]

They further wrote:

The ultimate objective of this strategy – to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income – will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.[5]

Michael Reisch and Janice Andrews wrote that Cloward and Piven "proposed to create a crisis in the current welfare system – by exploiting the gap between welfare law and practice – that would ultimately bring about its collapse and replace it with a system of guaranteed annual income. They hoped to accomplish this end by informing the poor of their rights to welfare assistance, encouraging them to apply for benefits and, in effect, overloading an already overburdened bureaucracy."[6]

It would appear you don't like the poor being not so poor. How compassionate of you being a Christian an all.

 

[mark francis]

It would appear you don't like the poor being not so poor. How compassionate of you being a Christian an all.

Robbing the middle class to give more money to the non-working class will not eliminate poverty, it will create more poverty.

 

[Boris Norris]

Robbing the middle class to give more money to the non-working class will not eliminate poverty, it will create more poverty.

Isn't that how Reagan said his trickle down theory would work?
His buddies trousered the lot.

What is your answer to poverty? Thoughts and prayers? Hasn't worked in the past.

 

[mark francis]

Isn't that how Reagan said his trickle down theory would work?
His buddies trousered the lot.

What is your answer to poverty? Thoughts and prayers? Hasn't worked in the past.

Communism does not eliminate poverty. Government regulation and oppression does not eliminate poverty. Socialism does not eliminate poverty. Fascism and tyranny do not eliminate poverty. Marxism does not eliminate poverty. Tribalism does not eliminate poverty.

Hard work and protections against theft of earnings eliminate poverty.

Proverbs 14:23​

“In all labour there is profit: but the talk of the lips tendeth only to penury.”

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Mark 14:7
For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always.

 

[pjmret]

Communism does not eliminate poverty. Government regulation and oppression does not eliminate poverty. Socialism does not eliminate poverty. Fascism and tyranny do not eliminate poverty. Marxism does not eliminate poverty. Tribalism does not eliminate poverty.

Hard work and protections against theft of earnings eliminate poverty.

Proverbs 14:23​

“In all labour there is profit: but the talk of the lips tendeth only to penury.”

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Mark 14:7
For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always.

Capitalism has never eliminated poverty

 

[mark francis]

Capitalism has never eliminated poverty

Capitalism has created great wealth in the US but nothing can eliminate poverty, especially bad forms of government that make poverty worse.

 

[pjmret]

Capitalism has created great wealth in the US but nothing can eliminate poverty, especially bad forms of government that make poverty worse.

So you admit capitalism can't eliminate poverty, yet you left it off your prior post, showing your bigotry

 

[mark francis]

So you admit capitalism can't eliminate poverty, yet you left it off your prior post, showing your bigotry

Capitalism made the US a great country. Marxism and socialism restrict freedoms and individual prosperities.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Robbing the middle class to give more money to the non-working class will not eliminate poverty, it will create more poverty.

Most poor people are employed, often they have more than one job, because employers can deny benefits to workers who work fewer than 40 hours. So they have two 30 hour a week jobs at or near the minimum wage.

The top 1% of Americans control 26% of the national wealth.