A true miscarriage, however, this wasn't a natural miscarriage, we'll call this the presidential support of aborting laws.
Eh? He didn't exactly make up the Presidential power of commutations, y'know -- it is a long-standing part of the Constitution. How you can say he's "aborting laws" when acting in perfect compliance with them is beyond me.
Guys, Libby's conviction was not exactly the most germane thing to the Plame case. It was Richard Armitage, not Libby, who leaked Plame's identity. And the leak itself was not a crime, even if it was sleazy (I don't even think it was particularly sleazy). And Libby was not convicted of anything immediately related to the Plame investigation, merely for obstruction of justice related to his recollection of an earlier conversation.
So, in summary, he was found guilty of lying about not remembering a conversation for a non-crime he didn't commit. USMC was righter than he knows when he said this was a non-issue; if only someone had told Patrick Fitzgerald. Whether or not the conviction was legitimate, it was so far removed from the actual cause of serving justice that a commutation of his sentence was hardly beyond the pale of legitimate discussion.
The fact that Libby worked in the White House is irrelevant. If the commutation is questionable, it is questionable on its face, not because the man who's sentence was commuted used to work for the man who issued the commutation.
r0beph, you don't get to complain about "logical fallacies" while indulging in them yourself.
But there are established Justice Department guidelines that presidents are supposed to, but not mandated to, go by when it comes to INTERNAL PARDONS AND COMMUTED SENTENCES.
There has never been a time when Presidents were even morally obligated to follow such guidelines; they were put in place for the benefit of prisoners, not Presidents, to ensure that their requests would be seen and considered by the President.
The President is not obligated to consider those requests, nor is he allowed to consider
only those requests. Constitutionally speaking, he can pardon people who haven't even been formally charged with a crime. (By contrast, Justice vets applications under its guidelines so heavily that only those who have served at least five years of their sentences can apply). So don't be silly.