Billionaire plans if giggles wins

[the annoying thing]

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/billionaire-says-ll-pull-money-104100496.html

We will see I agree it could kill investments . But hey why worry

 

[pjmret]

One person lol

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

It is entirely true that when the president is a Democrat, investors profit more, and employment is higher.
It is also entirely true than no president has done better his second tern than his first.

The lesson of history is to VOTE BLUE!

 

[mark francis]

It is entirely true that when the president is a Democrat, investors profit more, and employment is higher.
It is also entirely true than no president has done better his second tern than his first.

The lesson of history is to VOTE BLUE!

JFK lowered taxes on drivers of the economy because he thought forcing the IRS to climb back away a little from business investments would spur the economy, and he was right.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

JFK lowered taxes on drivers of the economy because he thought forcing the IRS to climb back away a little from business investments would spur the economy, and he was right.

Taxes were very high during the Eisenhower administration, because of the cost of the Korean War, so JFK reducing taxes did goose the economy. But it is not always true that tax cuts stimulate the economy. For example, when the money by a corporation is invested in buying more shares of the corporation, this rewards only those who own stock in the corporation. That is what happened with Trump's tax cuts. Then corporations rewarded the executives with shares in the corporation.

If the tax rate is 0%, then you will have no government, and the result is anarchy.
If the tax rate is 100%, then no one will work, because they will starve.

There is an ideal tax rate on profits, around 30% with no exceptions.

 

[mark francis]

Taxes were very high during the Eisenhower administration, because of the cost of the Korean War, so JFK reducing taxes did goose the economy. But it is not always true that tax cuts stimulate the economy. For example, when the money by a corporation is invested in buying more shares of the corporation, this rewards only those who own stock in the corporation. That is what happened with Trump's tax cuts. Then corporations rewarded the executives with shares in the corporation.

If the tax rate is 0%, then you will have no government, and the result is anarchy.
If the tax rate is 100%, then no one will work, because they will starve.

There is an ideal tax rate on profits, around 30% with no exceptions.

It is always true that government printing of more unbacked dollars to meet growing spending addictions leads to the devaluation of the dollar and the rise in costs of goods. That is what happened under Bidenomics.

 

[pjmret]

It is always true that government printing of more unbacked dollars to meet growing spending addictions leads to the devaluation of the dollar and the rise in costs of goods. That is what happened under Bidenomics.

We had inflation under Trump
And pretty much every president
Duh

 

[mark francis]

We had inflation under Trump
And pretty much every president
Duh

But we never experienced the high costs under Trump that were forced onto us by Biden swinging deals with foreigners that enriched himself while inflicting high costs on everyone else.

 

[pjmret]

But we never experienced the high costs under Trump that were forced onto us by Biden swinging deals with foreigners that enriched himself while inflicting high costs on everyone else.

Prove it

 

[mark francis]

We had inflation under Trump
And pretty much every president
Duh

Wasteful democrat pork spending reached a new high after democrats took control of the House budget writing in 2018. Inflation reached never before seen record highs under Biden. That defies any attempt at comparison with the economy under Trump.

 

[pjmret]

Wasteful democrat pork spending reached a new high after democrats took control of the House budget writing in 2018. Inflation reached never before seen record highs under Biden. That defies any attempt at comparison with the economy under Trump.

prove it.
and spending isn't done by the house itself, we've had this discussion, moooron. lol.
senate and potus have to approve it. duh.

god you are a political moooron

 

[mark francis]

prove it.
and spending isn't done by the house itself, we've had this discussion, moooron. lol.
senate and potus have to approve it. duh.

god you are a political moooron

Democrats wrote a $2 trillion, record-breaking, economy-busting budget that a democrat House and Senate majority approved and Biden signed, so how is that Trump's fault?

 

[pjmret]

Democrats wrote a $2 trillion, record-breaking, economy-busting budget that a democrat House and Senate majority approved and Biden signed, so how is that Trump's fault?

i said potus, not trump.
god you can't even read simple words. lol.

just pointing out that you keep whining about the house, but it takes all 3 branches to approve spending, including the republican controlled senate.

god you are beyond stupid lol

 

[mark francis]

i said potus, not trump.
god you can't even read simple words. lol.

just pointing out that you keep whining about the house, but it takes all 3 branches to approve spending, including the republican controlled senate.

god you are beyond stupid lol

Kackles owns the Bidenomics fiasco while Walz attempts to futilely explain that he was talking about the US not being able to afford 4 more years of Trump instead of 4 more years of Bidenomics.

 

[pjmret]

Kackles owns the Bidenomics fiasco while Walz attempts to futilely explain that he was talking about the US not being able to afford 4 more years of Trump instead of 4 more years of Bidenomics.

How could Harris own Something she isn't in charge of only someone completely stupid like yourself could claim she owns it LOL

But given how good unemployment and GDP growth have been I appreciate you giving or credit for that LOL