Popular vote and $5 gets you a latte at Starbucks.What about the actual reality of the POPULAR VOTE.
I think BO may have said it best... "you lost".
Popular vote and $5 gets you a latte at Starbucks.What about the actual reality of the POPULAR VOTE.
That only counts when they lose the electoral vote.
My head is where it's suppose to be.. thank you..
What about the actual reality of the POPULAR VOTE.
Sure it is!
Too bad it is not in harmony with your heart!
Or as John F Kerry said... "Get over it".Sure. . .but it counts for the people. It also makes the new President less popular. . .as we have witness by the dreadful approval rating of 45!.. . .and even those numbers are continuing to tank!
It seems to be a common practice now to say that Trump is the "anointed one", and is compared to the likes of Lincoln, or Cyrus the King of Persia who ruled over the Israelites. Unfortunately this is again an example of their ignorance, and their inability, or lack of desire, to accept truth, and reality:
http://www.christianpost.com/news/is-donald-trump-like-cyrus-from-the-bible-159079/
"But Cyrus did not only do this for the people of Israel.
This became a standard Persian policy, allowing exiles to return to their homelands and rebuild their temples as subjects of the Persian empire.
We know this from the famous Cyrus Cylinder that was discovered in 1879. There, we read that Marduk, the chief god of the Babylonian pantheon and called "the king of the gods" in the text, "took the hand of Cyrus . . . and called him by his name, proclaiming him aloud for the kingship over all of everything."
We also read in the text that Cyrus restored the various idol temples in his empire, which gives further confirmation to the biblical account.
So, here, it is Marduk who is given credit for the reign of Cyrus. In the Bible, it is Yahweh, the God of Israel and the only true God, who takes the credit. Obviously, Cyrus did not know Him, just as Isaiah said.
Could Donald Trump, then, be a modern day Cyrus? Could it be that Trump, like Cyrus, clearly does not know the Lord in a real and personal way but could still be used by God to accomplish His purposes?
As the saying goes, let God be God, meaning, it's up to Him to do what He wants to do. Only He can answer this question for sure.
Or, from a more secular perspective, only time will tell.
What's clear, though, is that God did not raise up an idol-worshiping king to rule the nation of Israel. That would have been a curse rather than a blessing.
In contrast, Christians are talking about God raising up Trump to lead America, which would be very different than Cyrus being used to help the exiles return to Jerusalem and rebuild it.
That doesn't mean, of course, that Trump could not be a Cyrus type of figure. It simply means that the parallel breaks down when applied.
But there's another possibility to consider.
There was another ancient king named Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian leader who, decades before Cyrus became king, led his armies to destroy Jerusalem, burn down the temple, and send the Jewish people into exile in 586 BC.
He too was an idol worshiper, yet shockingly, Yahweh called him "My servant," stating plainly, "behold, I will send for all the tribes of the north, declares the LORD, and for Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, my servant, and I will bring them against this land [meaning Judah] and its inhabitants, and against all these surrounding nations. I will devote them to destruction, and make them a horror, a hissing, and an everlasting desolation" (Jer 25:9; see also 27:6; 43:10).
So, Cyrus was anointed by God to restore the Jewish people from captivity and to rebuild Jerusalem after Nebuchadnezzar, as a vessel of divine judgment, was called by God to send the Jewish people into exile and to destroy Jerusalem.
Two pagan kings, one raised up to bring judgment and the other raised up to bring restoration.
Is Donald Trump a Cyrus or a Nebuchadnezzar, if either?"
Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/i...us-from-the-bible-159079/#RRHsmLdlqjT0sqvX.99
This idiot follower knows Hillary won the popular vote because of California, So the rest of the country got what they wanted, California didn't..Like I said before.. I can live with that..Yes we know, and that is why Trump, and his idiot followers, want others to believe he would have won the popular vote is not for 3-5 million illegals voting which is just another issue he will never prove, and will ignore the truth if it ever comes out.
Or as John F Kerry said... "Get over it".
Did I pretend he didn't win?Just as you got over it when President Obama was elected BY A HUGE MARGIN twice?
You are not completely stupid. . .NO ONE but imbeciles could have denied he won BOTH the electoral AND the popular vote!Did I pretend he didn't win?
Did I pretend he didn't win?
I am not an American but the Electoral College voting system is how American determine the President. It was introduce as were similar systems I other countries to protect minorities> In Australia we give equal votes to smaller states like Tasmania to those of the larger states. This is to protect the federation >This is the system that all Presidents were elected . If you want to change the system you need a vote on the constitution.. In the meantime you are stuck with Trump for four years unless it get impeached or killed, Even then you will still have a Republican President. In Australia we have a Prime Minister who won by one seat and is ten point behind. But we can't get rid of him until the end of his term.