And They Say Hillary Is Corrupt

[grumpy]

Bottom line is you sold out your principles, and integrity, and voted for what you presumed to be the lesser of two evils, and ignored better qualified candidates who's views better represented those you say you believe in. In fact, that is what the greater majority of the people have done, and that is why the country is where it is.

Thanks again for your unwanted opinion. It means nothing. I'm sorry yes it does. it must mean something to you.

 

[grumpy]

I know a guy who can’t help but straighten every crooked picture he sees. He has a brilliant mind, is good at winning arguments and uses those skills to engage every wrong he perceives. He really bugs me sometimes. I think what bugs me most about him is that he’s often right. The second thing that bugs me is that he reminds me of myself. A part of myself that, well… annoys me.

The first time I ever fully realized that being right might be a vice was in a response I got on Facebook a while back. I had posted on my personal page that not everyone believes what we believe and to expect non-Christians to act like Christians was counterproductive. Someone responded, “Well, that makes them wrong, doesn’t it?”

He was right, but something about the way in which he was right felt very Wrong. I couldn’t put into words what it was that I was feeling, but I knew that the way he’d responded wasn’t Christian, even though think he is.

Since then, I’ve come to a deeper understanding of how my tendency to want to fix everyone’s bad theology/morals often negates their ability to accept any kindness from me. It also invites them to pick me apart; find everything nasty about me, and throw it in my face. It obliterates any chance at relationships.

Truth matters. I want to be clear that I believe that. But knowing truth, and being wise about when kindness and mercy matter more than correcting theological error or ignorance, is an important skill to hone. Because I want to be right. I want to fix you so much it’s literally painful at times. I’m a sick, sick puppy who’s not near as smart as he thinks he is. But I’m learning that the need to be right on every little thing—even when it comes from noble intentions obliterates my ability to speak the Truth or make a difference.

 

[Old_Trapper70]

I know a guy who can’t help but straighten every crooked picture he sees. He has a brilliant mind, is good at winning arguments and uses those skills to engage every wrong he perceives. He really bugs me sometimes. I think what bugs me most about him is that he’s often right. The second thing that bugs me is that he reminds me of myself. A part of myself that, well… annoys me.

The first time I ever fully realized that being right might be a vice was in a response I got on Facebook a while back. I had posted on my personal page that not everyone believes what we believe and to expect non-Christians to act like Christians was counterproductive. Someone responded, “Well, that makes them wrong, doesn’t it?”

He was right, but something about the way in which he was right felt very Wrong. I couldn’t put into words what it was that I was feeling, but I knew that the way he’d responded wasn’t Christian, even though think he is.

Since then, I’ve come to a deeper understanding of how my tendency to want to fix everyone’s bad theology/morals often negates their ability to accept any kindness from me. It also invites them to pick me apart; find everything nasty about me, and throw it in my face. It obliterates any chance at relationships.

Truth matters. I want to be clear that I believe that. But knowing truth, and being wise about when kindness and mercy matter more than correcting theological error or ignorance, is an important skill to hone. Because I want to be right. I want to fix you so much it’s literally painful at times. I’m a sick, sick puppy who’s not near as smart as he thinks he is. But I’m learning that the need to be right on every little thing—even when it comes from noble intentions obliterates my ability to speak the Truth or make a difference.

First off, we don't discuss every little thing, and my correcting you is what scripture calls for if you know the scripture:


2 Timothy 4:2
"Preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching"

Now, the topic we have been discussing is your use of falsehoods, and *********, to defend your voting for Trump. IMO, and that of the words of Christ, and the apostles, no one calling himself a Christian should have voted for one as corrupt as Trump, or Hillary. What will happen now to the country

http://repentnow.com/sinfulnation.htm

 

[Aus22]

Hillary had been I the USA political system for thirty years. She appear corrupt and so was rejected. Trump is an outsider so we do not know if he is corrupt. Time will tell

 

[Old_Trapper70]

Hillary had been I the USA political system for thirty years. She appear corrupt and so was rejected. Trump is an outsider so we do not know if he is corrupt. Time will tell

How do you define "corrupt"? He has had 3500 lawsuits filed against him, been fined for discrimination, hired illegal immigrants, has had his charity denied for failure to register it, in fact, there is nothing that Hillary has done that makes some call he corrupt that cannot be mirrored by Trump. Even now he will spend years, unless he pardons himself, or such *********, fighting the current stream of lawsuits filed against him

 

[Aus22]

Trump Corruption in the past did not result from holding political office. Hillary's did.

 

[grumpy]

First off, we don't discuss every little thing, and my correcting you is what scripture calls for if you know the scripture:


2 Timothy 4:2
"Preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching"

Now, the topic we have been discussing is your use of falsehoods, and *********, to defend your voting for Trump. IMO, and that of the words of Christ, and the apostles, no one calling himself a Christian should have voted for one as corrupt as Trump, or Hillary. What will happen now to the country

http://repentnow.com/sinfulnation.htm

Again trapper that's your opinion . I have a different one. Trump will do OK, IMO he WAS a BETTER Choice. Let me ask you something, were christian better back then? Were Christian Leaders better back then?

 

[Old_Trapper70]

Again trapper that's your opinion . I have a different one. Trump will do OK, IMO he WAS a BETTER Choice. Let me ask you something, were christian better back then? Were Christian Leaders better back then?

Quite a bit so until the 300's when the Roman Catholic Church corrupted Christianity. And it used government to do so.

 

[Aus22]

Trump Opposed Late term abortions , Hillary did not. On this issue who is the better Christian?

 

[grumpy]

Trump Opposed Late term abortions , Hillary did not. On this issue who is the better Christian?

Sin is Sin and we all sin. We can not judge any ones salvation.. I personally have a real problem with any form of abortion..

 

[stephen50right]

Hillary who? Never heard of her.

 

[Pandora]

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/11/11/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-emails-documents-515120.html

Over the course of decades, Donald Trump’s companies have systematically destroyed or hidden thousands of emails, digital records and paper documents demanded in official proceedings, often in defiance of court orders. These tactics—exposed by a Newsweek review of thousands of pages of court filings, judicial orders and affidavits from an array of court cases—have enraged judges, prosecutors, opposing lawyers and the many ordinary citizens entangled in litigation with Trump. In each instance, Trump and entities he controlled also erected numerous hurdles that made lawsuits drag on for years, forcing courtroom opponents to spend huge sums of money in legal fees as they struggled—sometimes in vain—to obtain records.

This behavior is of particular import given Trump’s frequent condemnations of Hillary Clinton, his Democratic opponent, for having deleted more than 30,000 emails from a server she used during her time as secretary of state. While Clinton and her lawyers have said all of those emails were personal, Trump has suggested repeatedly on the campaign trail that they were government documents Clinton was trying to hide and that destroying them constituted a crime. The allegation—which the FBI concluded was not supported by any evidence—is a crowd-pleaser at Trump rallies, often greeted by supporters chanting, “Lock her up!”

Trump’s use of deception and untruthful affidavits, as well as the hiding or improper destruction of documents, dates back to at least 1973, when the Republican nominee, his father and their real estate company battled the federal government over civil charges that they refused to rent apartments to African-Americans. The Trump strategy was simple: deny, impede and delay, while destroying documents the court had ordered them to hand over.

Shortly after the government filed its case in October, Trump attacked: He falsely declared to reporters that the feds had no evidence he and his father discriminated against minorities, but instead were attempting to force them to lease to welfare recipients who couldn’t pay their rent.

The family’s attempts to slow down the federal case were at times nonsensical. Trump submitted an affidavit contending that the government had engaged in some unspecified wrongdoing by releasing statements to the press on the day it brought the case without first having any “formal communications” with him; he contended that he’d learned of the complaint only while listening to his car radio that morning. But Trump’s sworn statement was a lie. Court records show that the government had filed its complaint at 10 a.m. and phoned him almost immediately afterward. The government later notified the media with a press release.

Prosecutors responded to Trump’s affidavit by showing he had fudged his claim by using the term “formal communication”—an acknowledgment, they said, that he had received what only he would characterize as an informal notification—which they described as an intentional effort to mislead the court and the public. But the allegation slowed the case; it required government lawyers to appear in court to shoot down Trump’s false charge."

She is. But trump probably is too

 

[Phoenix68]

Hillary and her enablers have made their bed and are now lying in it..

.
Why Putin Hates Hillary
.
.
Trump Can’t Stop Praising Putin
June 2, 2023
.​

 

[Phoenix68]

Hillary who? Never heard of her.

.

.​

 

[Phoenix68]

.

.​