n0spam4me is right. The government planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks. The evidence for that is so clear that anyone still promoting the theory that the planes were really hickacked and the government knew it was going to happen and let it happen either simply hasn't seen the evidence, or is part of the government disinfo campaign.
I posted this stuff on another 9/11 thread, but I'm going to post it here too.
--------------------------------------------------
Look at this picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg
It's too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
http://www.caverca.com/Images/Boeing 757 TACV 01.jpg
The photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon was taken with a fish-eye lens which causes some distortion but the rest of the objects in the picture are not distorted to the same degree as the nose of a 757 would have to be to have that shape. The shadow line is visible under the nose and it's consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon.
The picture is consistent with these analyses.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/ArticlesMeyer3March2006.html
Also, we know that the Pentagon is about 75 feet high and that a 757 is about 150 feet long. If we look at the section of the Pentagon where the plane hit in the picture at the top of this page...
http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm
...and compare it with the space behind the box where the aircraft is, we can see that a 757 couldn't fit in that space without the nose protruding out front. The plane in the space behind the box is much too short to be a 757.
A 757 would look like this.
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/pentagon/pentacamscam.jpg
This analysis makes it pretty clear that a 757 wouldn't fit behind the box.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm
Also, if you look at the fourth picture from the top on this page, you'll see the hole made by the craft.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings
There would have been some damage from the wings of a 757. Look at the damage caused by the 767 on the side of the tower.
http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c0ac653ef00e5537c495d8834-pi
There's quite a difference.
These three articles are important.
http://www.physics911.net/omholt
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-they-didnt-use-757-to-hit-pentagon.html
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are some good documentaries in this link.
http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
Be sure to watch "9/11 Mysteries" and "Painful Deceptions". This stuff below is good too. The first two videos are about the "Thermite" issue. Be sure to watch them.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8989407671184881047
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSh5o6ca8FM
http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9t_i08d1xc
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-they-didnt-use-757-to-hit-pentagon.html
I think that those people who put forth the no-plane theory, etc are governnment disinfo agents trying to cause disruption in the 9/11 truth movement. If there are some wacko theories out there that make the official version look logical by comparison, fewer people will join the truth movement.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222
This article deals with that subject.
http://pseudonautics.blogspot.com/2008/11/disinformation-techniques.html
(excerpt)
--------------------------------------------------------------
The best way to harm a cause is to defend it using wrong arguments.
This is why, every time there is a government conspiracy, you have a load of kooks making ridiculous claims to discredit critics by association.
Concerning 911, you have pod people, holograms, WTC nuclear devices, and directed energy weapons from space.
--------------------------------------------------------------
So does this video.
http://skoolpool.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
(7:22 and 9:32 time marks)
They pulled off the 9/11 attack so they would have a pretext to invade the Middle East to get control of the oil there. This is an old story.
http://video.google.es/videosearch?q=terror+storm#
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO301A.html
http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ/agp/free/chossudovsky/fabricatingenemy.htm
Here's some stuff about the history of US and British meddling in the Middle East.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5267640865741878159
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2002/1000history.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/history/britishindex.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/irqindx.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2003/2003companiesiniraq.htm
http://www.war-times.org/pdf/Oil leaflet.pdf
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/intervention/2004/1007oilprotection.htm
These two are important.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490&pl=true
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jle47NiSNSQ&feature=related
Here's some more stuff.
http://killtown.911review.org/911links.html#forums
http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/claim.html
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/11/where-pentagon-was-hit.html
http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/theories.html#5
http://www.netctr.com/media.html
http://www.netctr.com/911exposed.html
http://www.sott.net/signs/editorial...AttackReleaseConfirmsBoeingWasNotInvolved.php
I posted this stuff on another 9/11 thread, but I'm going to post it here too.
--------------------------------------------------
Look at this picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg
It's too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
http://www.caverca.com/Images/Boeing 757 TACV 01.jpg
The photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon was taken with a fish-eye lens which causes some distortion but the rest of the objects in the picture are not distorted to the same degree as the nose of a 757 would have to be to have that shape. The shadow line is visible under the nose and it's consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon.
The picture is consistent with these analyses.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/ArticlesMeyer3March2006.html
Also, we know that the Pentagon is about 75 feet high and that a 757 is about 150 feet long. If we look at the section of the Pentagon where the plane hit in the picture at the top of this page...
http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm
...and compare it with the space behind the box where the aircraft is, we can see that a 757 couldn't fit in that space without the nose protruding out front. The plane in the space behind the box is much too short to be a 757.
A 757 would look like this.
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/pentagon/pentacamscam.jpg
This analysis makes it pretty clear that a 757 wouldn't fit behind the box.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm
Also, if you look at the fourth picture from the top on this page, you'll see the hole made by the craft.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings
There would have been some damage from the wings of a 757. Look at the damage caused by the 767 on the side of the tower.
http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c0ac653ef00e5537c495d8834-pi
There's quite a difference.
These three articles are important.
http://www.physics911.net/omholt
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-they-didnt-use-757-to-hit-pentagon.html
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are some good documentaries in this link.
http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
Be sure to watch "9/11 Mysteries" and "Painful Deceptions". This stuff below is good too. The first two videos are about the "Thermite" issue. Be sure to watch them.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8989407671184881047
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSh5o6ca8FM
http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9t_i08d1xc
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-they-didnt-use-757-to-hit-pentagon.html
I think that those people who put forth the no-plane theory, etc are governnment disinfo agents trying to cause disruption in the 9/11 truth movement. If there are some wacko theories out there that make the official version look logical by comparison, fewer people will join the truth movement.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222
This article deals with that subject.
http://pseudonautics.blogspot.com/2008/11/disinformation-techniques.html
(excerpt)
--------------------------------------------------------------
The best way to harm a cause is to defend it using wrong arguments.
This is why, every time there is a government conspiracy, you have a load of kooks making ridiculous claims to discredit critics by association.
Concerning 911, you have pod people, holograms, WTC nuclear devices, and directed energy weapons from space.
--------------------------------------------------------------
So does this video.
http://skoolpool.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
(7:22 and 9:32 time marks)
They pulled off the 9/11 attack so they would have a pretext to invade the Middle East to get control of the oil there. This is an old story.
http://video.google.es/videosearch?q=terror+storm#
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO301A.html
http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ/agp/free/chossudovsky/fabricatingenemy.htm
Here's some stuff about the history of US and British meddling in the Middle East.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5267640865741878159
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2002/1000history.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/history/britishindex.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/irqindx.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2003/2003companiesiniraq.htm
http://www.war-times.org/pdf/Oil leaflet.pdf
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/intervention/2004/1007oilprotection.htm
These two are important.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490&pl=true
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jle47NiSNSQ&feature=related
Here's some more stuff.
http://killtown.911review.org/911links.html#forums
http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/claim.html
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/11/where-pentagon-was-hit.html
http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/theories.html#5
http://www.netctr.com/media.html
http://www.netctr.com/911exposed.html
http://www.sott.net/signs/editorial...AttackReleaseConfirmsBoeingWasNotInvolved.php
