9/11 Conspiracy (continued from Ron Paul thread)

[KeepOurFreedoms]

There's no reasoning with him. Most 9/11 conspiracies don't even make sense because there is no reason for the Bush administration to do what they say. The only real argument a sane individual can make is that Bush knew but didn't do anything and this in itself is unprovable (like FDR and Pearl Harbor).

Control of the people.

 

[KeepOurFreedoms]

I submit that you are off your rocker and have little to no knowledge of this event wrt military exercises are conducted.

AND the WTC7 stuff is just bunk.

How do you explain the free fall demolition of building 7?

 

[Chin]

How do you explain the free fall demolition of building 7?

Gravity.

 

[KeepOurFreedoms]

Gravity.

Nope. Too much building in the way for free fall speed.

 

[jb_1430]

Nope. Too much building in the way for free fall speed.

You have merely heard the claim made over and over and over again. None of the buildings fell at freefall speed. MARK

 

[Chin]

Nope. Too much building in the way for free fall speed.

Here ya go, friend....

www.jod911.com/Roberts_WTC7_Lies.doc

It's a word Doc, so you'll need to download it.

 

[KeepOurFreedoms]

You have merely heard the claim made over and over and over again. None of the buildings fell at freefall speed. MARK

I've also watched the buildings fall as they fell on 9/11/01. Also have watched the videos many times since that day. Have You?

 

[KeepOurFreedoms]

Here ya go, friend....

www.jod911.com/Roberts_WTC7_Lies.doc

It's a word Doc, so you'll need to download it.

What is it? Does it have a virus in it? Who produced it? and for what purpose?

 

[USMC the Almighty]

One question:

Why would Bush "blow up" WTC 7? What possible reason would he have to do so?

If WTC 1 and WTC 2 were already down, then isn't the justification for war already there? What does Bush stand to gain from the collapse of WTC 7? Isn't his objective (providing a justification for war in Iraq) completed? Why would he jeopardize this? It's the same with the "missile" on the Pentagon?

Why would he need to do this, if the WTCs were already hit?

 

[vyo476]

One question:

Why would Bush "blow up" WTC 7? What possible reason would he have to do so?

If WTC 1 and WTC 2 were already down, then isn't the justification for war already there? What does Bush stand to gain from the collapse of WTC 7? Isn't his objective (providing a justification for war in Iraq) completed? Why would he jeopardize this? It's the same with the "missile" on the Pentagon?

Why would he need to do this, if the WTCs were already hit?

An excellent point. The Towers were not just buildings, they were huge symbols - driving planes into them was akin to dragging someone into town square, chopping off his thumbs, waiting for the town to show up and watch and then chopping off his head. Once that's done, why bother kicking a squirrel on the way out of town?

 

[n0spam4me]

Why distroy WTC towers and WTC7?
How about the destruction of EVIDENCE?

It was a shock and awe show for the AMERICA people so Bush would have the "political capital" to be able to work the plan of handing over AMERICA to GREED INC.

The hit to the PENTAGON qualifies as a surgical strike, the planers had it figured out who had to be eliminated to cover their tracks. The hit to the PENTAGON served the purpose of adding to the shock & awe show and also convenently killing people who where in a position to spoil the party for the perpeTRATORS.

What has Richard Cheney ever done that instills the trust that you seem to have for this man?

 

[KeepOurFreedoms]

One question:

Why would Bush "blow up" WTC 7? What possible reason would he have to do so?

If WTC 1 and WTC 2 were already down, then isn't the justification for war already there? What does Bush stand to gain from the collapse of WTC 7? Isn't his objective (providing a justification for war in Iraq) completed? Why would he jeopardize this? It's the same with the "missile" on the Pentagon?

Why would he need to do this, if the WTCs were already hit?

What offices were housed in 7?

 

[USMC the Almighty]

What offices were housed in 7?

I have no idea.

 

[USMC the Almighty]

Why distroy WTC towers and WTC7?
How about the destruction of EVIDENCE?

It was a shock and awe show for the AMERICA people so Bush would have the "political capital" to be able to work the plan of handing over AMERICA to GREED INC.

The hit to the PENTAGON qualifies as a surgical strike, the planers had it figured out who had to be eliminated to cover their tracks. The hit to the PENTAGON served the purpose of adding to the shock & awe show and also convenently killing people who where in a position to spoil the party for the perpeTRATORS.

What has Richard Cheney ever done that instills the trust that you seem to have for this man?

You failed at your attempt to dodge the question. If Bush wanted to give himself a justification for war, why would he continue to needlessly kill Americans once the justification had been provided? Saying "it's for Shock and Awe" doesn't answer the question. One hit would have been shock and awe. Four would've been excessive and way too risky if they were to actually plan them out. It would require a large amount of people (and every person could potentially reveal the plan) that simply weren't needed.

As for the Pentagon -- there's no way they would coordinate a strike on the Pentagon in hopes of killing people who were in on the plan. Thousands of people work there and only about 100 were killed. They couldn't have banked on killing specific workers within the Pentagon.

 

[jb_1430]

I've also watched the buildings fall as they fell on 9/11/01. Also have watched the videos many times since that day. Have You?

Of course I have. Im just not fool enough to believe that I can "watch" a video of a collapse and measure the speed of its fall. MARK