What Mark Francis Doesn't Like To Talk-About

[Gabriel_Bell]

Darwin was trained in theology, yet he rejected what the Bible said about creation. Richard Dawkins and other vocal atheists insist (without evidence or proof) that there is no God, but not because they have not read the Bible. Dawkins must have read the Bible since he offered his twisted take of what was said about God.


View attachment 10935

And Dawkins is 100% accurate on everything he says.

 

[the annoying thing]

.
View attachment 10876
.
'Round here, it's called Ignoring.
.
View attachment 10877
.​

Why thats the democrat way ignore it and it will either go away or get so big you cannt fix it just like the illegals and debt and joes mental health

 

[mark francis]

And Dawkins is 100% accurate on everything he says.

He is when he suggests he is deluded about God, even confessing to his delusions in his book, The God Delusion.

 

[Boris Norris]

He is when he suggests he is deluded about God, even confessing to his delusions in his book, The God Delusion.

Show where he said that.

 

[Phoenix68]

.

.​

 

[the annoying thing]

.

.​

Your a jerk

 

[Phoenix68]

.

.

.​

 

[mark francis]

.

.
View attachment 11605
.​

Biden praying for his son (paraphrased, like a Schiff paraphrase of a phone conversation some crook delivered to him under the table the neither one of them was supposed to have): 'Please, dear God, let Garland get away with dropping all charges against my precious boy on the basis that somebody lied to the FBI about a related matter.'

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

In reality, no one is right 100% of the time. As for Darwin, he simply stated that the adaptive changes in the birds and other animals he studied could not have occurred in a period of 6000 years. Of course, the Bible really sucks as history. The date that the ostensibly left Egypt are never mentioned, nor is the name of the Pharaoh. The Bible does not directly state the specific number of years, it only suggests an incomplete genealogy of the various patriarchs starting with Adam. Much later, an Anglican bishop estimated that this was a period of 6000 years (or would have been by now).

You have to be rather daft to actually believe that all those early Hebrews lived for up to eight centuries.

Darwin was a scientist, not a theologian, when he wrote Origin of Species.

 

[mark francis]

In reality, no one is right 100% of the time. As for Darwin, he simply stated that the adaptive changes in the birds and other animals he studied could not have occurred in a period of 6000 years. Of course, the Bible really sucks as history.

Darwin was a scientist, not a theologian, when he wrote Origin of Species.

What Darwin did was stupid. He realized that birds could not have evolved in 6,000 years so instead of admitting he was wrong he accused God of being wrong. What a moron. He got a degree in theology, but he was as dumb about God as he was ignorant of science.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

What Darwin did was stupid. He realized that birds could not have evolved in 6,000 years so instead of admitting he was wrong he accused God of being wrong. What a moron. He got a degree in theology, but he was as dumb about God as he was ignorant of science.

At NO POINT did Darwin EVER say that "God was wrong". You have never read Darwin, you have only read the fundie preachers who claimed that people were descended from monkeys.
Darwin was correct to say that the changes animals took longer than 6000 years. Again, the Bible does not say the universe was 6000 years old. It only enumerated a rather silly genealogy

​

$2,974.57
6.31%

What Darwin did was stupid. He realized that birds could not have evolved in 6,000 years so instead of admitting he was wrong he accused God of being wrong. What a moron. He got a degree in theology, but he was as dumb about God as he was ignorant of science.

Darwin studied medicine at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland and a Christ's College in Cambridge. He dd not have a degree in theology at all.

At no point did Darwin ever accuse God of being wrong. You have not read Darwin, or even valid books about Darwin. You seem to only have heard a lot of nonsense from fundie preachers who claimed that Darwin said that humans were descended from monkeys.

Everyone is pretty much "dumb about God". No one knows where he came from or how old he is, or whether we should fear him or love him, or even how many of him there are. Some say one, others claim three. God is mute, seldom seen, and apparently not interested is talking about himself to anyone. He changes from a nasty guy who tortures his most faithful believer Job to win a bet with Satan, and orders the extermination of entire tribes of people in the Old Testament to a sort of loving figure in the New Testament. And then in the Book of Revelation, back into a rather nasty guy again.

 

[Phoenix68]

.

.

.

.

.​

 

[mark francis]

.

.

.

.

.​

 

[mark francis]

And Dawkins is 100% accurate on everything he says.

He is like a god to rebels against God.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

He is like a god to rebels against God.

Dawkins claims that God does not exist.

I say that Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny and unicorns do not exist.
Does that make me a "rebel against Santa, the Easter Bunny and unicorns"?

Mark Francis has very fuzzy thinking.

Who is the "rebel against God", then?
That's an easy one: <enable thunderous voice> SATAN! <disable thunderous voice>.