Well well well.

[Boris Norris]

Democrats deny the evidence of fraud, but they cannot disprove the evidence of fraud.

It reminds me of you birthers promoting Obama was not American. The revelation of the truth shut your mouths.
I'd like to see they did produce the evidence just to sit you in your lard arse.
But the law doesn't allow capitulation to any dickhead who feels he has greater intelligence than elected officials bearing in mind you said nothing when Trump won.

A judge in Pennsylvania has to again force lazy or corrupt election officials to do the right thing, something that seems to be a continuing problem with so many elections officials in various states like Pennsylvania.

Judge Overrules Board of Elections' Refusal to Recount Ballots in Sharp Rebuke (westernjournal.com)

Judge Overrules Board of Elections' Refusal to Recount Ba

Democrats deny the evidence of fraud, but they cannot disprove the evidence of fraud. A judge in Pennsylvania has to again force lazy or corrupt election officials to do the right thing, something that seems to be a continuing problem with so many elections officials in various states like Pennsylvania.

Judge Overrules Board of Elections' Refusal to Recount Ballots in Sharp Rebuke (westernjournal.com)

Judge Overrules Board of Elections' Refusal to Recount Ballots in Sharp Rebuke

llots in Sharp Rebuke

Let's dissect wQ

Democrats deny the evidence of fraud, but they cannot disprove the evidence of fraud. A judge in Pennsylvania has to again force lazy or corrupt election officials to do the right thing, something that seems to be a continuing problem with so many elections officials in various states like Pennsylvania.

Judge Overrules Board of Elections' Refusal to Recount Ballots in Sharp Rebuke (westernjournal.com)

Judge Overrules Board of Elections' Refusal to Recount Ballots in Sharp Rebuke

hat is said in your link. Heres the first assumption although the disclaimer includes sleight if hands and an always dubious "may

I know — not exactly anyone’s idea of a good time. But this is important, because we need to look at the sleights of hand and skirtings of law that may be going on around the country.

Democrats deny the evidence of fraud, but they cannot disprove the evidence of fraud. A judge in Pennsylvania has to again force lazy or corrupt election officials to do the right thing, something that seems to be a continuing problem with so many elections officials in various states like Pennsylvania.

Judge Overrules Board of Elections' Refusal to Recount Ballots in Sharp Rebuke (westernjournal.com)

Judge Overrules Board of Elections' Refusal to Recount Ballots in Sharp Rebuke

The first thing you should acknowledge but won't is the rag you quoted uts a right wing arse wipe with a history of propaganda. But you're entitled to believe lies with your current history regarding god.

The first paragraph implies there is impropriety without evidence and says "may" be problems.

Not interested in Going further other than to say, if officials broke the law they should be punished etc and the judge did something. But nothing was found untoward surrounding the original count. It was a feeble attempt by the obvious republican officials and a solid belief Trump should have won which spurred them to call a judge in. They must feel ridiculous after doubting their own figures/count.

So the moral of the story is clearly no mass fraud happened. From your perspective you never laid a glove on anyone and proved nothing. Just he same bitterness and bile to which you are welcome.

 

[mark francis]

And so he should have been. My research revealed he was well known for it and officials had been alerted.

But 10000 dead people voting, physically visiting a both and voting?
That is ridiculously stupid from you.

How many votes were actually cast in the names of dead people and can you support your speculation or assertion with facts. Respectable researchers have discovered that thousands of votes were cast in the names of dead people in 2020 and those researchers have not yet been proven wrong. This report fact-checks a claim that 14,000 votes were cast in the name of dead people in one Michigan county in 2020. I want to believe facts no matter where they take me so I want to see what exactly this fact-check article disproves and does not disprove.

Fact check: False claim that 14,000 dead people voted in Michigan (usatoday.com)

Fact check: No evidence that 14,000 dead people cast ballots in Wayne County, Michigan (we must read on for proof of that claim)
McKenzie Sadeghi

USA TODAY:09

The claim: 14,000 dead people voted in Wayne County, Michigan (I believe we can safely say that claim was made since this article is challenging it.)

Attempting to discredit election results in a battleground state, a number of social media posts shared this week make the claim that thousands of voters in Michigan had cast a ballot under the names of deceased people.

"Here is a list of 14+ thousand dead people who voted in Wayne County (Detroit)," reads a Facebook post from The Liberalists that directs to an invalid link. (We must assume the fact that the link is now invalid means nothing since it we don't know why it is no longer valid and the author of this paper does not claim an invalid link makes the whole claim invalid.
The page asks users to "verify it" by doing a search of the names on the Michigan Voter Information Center.

In a message to USA TODAY, The Liberalists said the link was to a database list of dead people you could put in yourself, but that the link was removed by Facebook. Congress is currently investigating Facebook's attacks on conservative speech to help the Democrats in the 2020 election. We should not be surprised if Facebook took the link down for that reason.

Many voters on list are old, but still alive How many invalid names on the list of 14,000 have been found to still be living? They don't say, meaning they have not disproven that thousands of votes were cast in the names of dead people.

The link that the user claimed to be evidence is no longer available. The site reads that it has been "expired, removed by its creator, or removed by one of the Pastebin staff." (Leftist government censorship? The author does not say.)

However, while the link was still live, PolitiFact found that the voters listed were over the age of 100 but several were not marked in Michigan's voter information center and not all were Wayne County residents.

One of the alleged dead voters listed, Imo Oliver, of Ypsilanti, is still alive, according to PolitiFact. She said she suffered from memory loss but that her son helped her to vote in the 2020 election. (One of the 14,000 dead voters is actually still alive? How many does that leave on the list of dead voters?)

Fact check: False claim that deceased Michigan man voted in 2020 (Fact-checkers claim another man was falsely listed, but they list no proof.)

 

[mark francis]

How many votes were actually cast in the names of dead people and can you support yy list no proof.)

Fact check: Lawsuit alleging errors in Detroit voter rolls was in 2019 and was settled (This statement proves nothing except to reveal the dishonesty of the election officials who claimed in the 2019 settlement that they corrected their mistakes in record-keeping and now regularly purge their rolls of ineligible names. If that had been so they would not have had to purge hundreds of thousands of names again soon after the 2020 election.)

The Michigan Secretary of State's office states on its fact-check page that ballots of voters who have died are rejected in Michigan, even if a voter cast an absentee ballot and then died prior to Election Day. (That cannot be true since crooks can still vote in the names of dead voters whose names have not yet been purged from the voter registry.
Poll workers on the day of the election cannot reject votes in the names of dead people they do not know are dead.)

"On rare occasions, a ballot received for a living voter may be recorded in a way that makes it appear as if the voter is dead," the site reads. "This can be because of voters with similar names, where the ballot is accidentally recorded as voted by John Smith Sr when it was actually voted by John Smith Jr; or because of inaccurately recorded birth dates in the qualified voter file."

For example, a voter born in 1990 can be accidentally recorded as being born in 1890, but in this type of scenario, no one ineligible actually voted and there is "no impact on the outcome of the election," according to the site.

This was the case in an example cited in a viral video on Twitter. Amanda Kirkpatrick, the clerk in Jackson County, Michigan, told The New York Times that a resident used in one of the videos was actually an eligible voter who had cast her ballot but had the incorrect date of the birth.

Michigan’s Secretary of State office debunked as "misinformation" the claim that a 118-year-old man named William Bradley had cast an absentee ballot, USA TODAY reported. (This reasoning proves nothing and even if the claims were backed by facts there seems to only be a handful of the 14,000 that may have not actually been illegally cast.)

Fact check: Georgia ballot curing is not election fraud

Studies and experts say there is generally no evidence of ballots cast in the names of dead voters

USA TODAY has previously fact-checked the claim that dead people are casting ballots and found no evidence to support this.
(One reputable official claims to have found no fraud but that does not refute with evidence the claims by another official who claims to have found fraud.)

Lorraine Minnite, a political science professor at Rutgers University and author of "The Myth of Voter Fraud," previously told USA TODAY that because it takes election officials some time to sort things out, there could be a short period of time that a voter registration list contains names of people who have died. (Detroit election officials claimed they took remedial action in 2019 to purge the names of ineligible voters yet in Jan 2020 they purged hundreds of thousands more names on one day? How many names did they purge in 2019 after months of keeping corrupted books, more or less than were purged in Jan 2021? Nothing is proved here except the massive purge of the books shortly after the 2020 election, proving there was no regular purging of the ineligible names before that.)

Minnite said referencing voter registration lists to support the claim that dead people can vote is misleading because the lists are regularly updated. (The purge of 174,000 names in Jan 2020 proves the lists are not regularly purged. Not only that but Michigan is suing in court to keep dead voter's names on their corrupted rolls, as seen here:

Michigan’s Secretary of State Fights to Keep Dead on Voter Rolls

In an order that illustrates the bizarre views of controversial Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a federal court has turned down Benson’s motion to throw out a lawsuit filed against her for refusing to remove almost 26,000 dead voters from Michigan voters rolls.

www.heritage.org

In an order that illustrates the bizarre views of controversial Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a federal court has turned down Benson’s motion to throw out a lawsuit filed against her for refusing to remove almost 26,000 dead voters from Michigan voters rolls.


Our rating: False

The claim that 14,000 dead people in Wayne County, Michigan, voted in the 2020 election is FALSE, based on our research. The list has been investigated and it was found that some individuals on the list were either still alive, or not living in Michigan. (Talking about some individuals who may have done this or that does not disprove the investigative finding that thousands of dead people voted in 2020.)

Other examples cited were the result of date of birth errors. Ballots cast by dead people in Michigan are rejected and there is no evidence of fraud. (If a dead person's name is on the books there is no way a vote in that name will be rejected at the polling station.)

Claiming the finding of fraud is untrue is not the same thing as disproving the claims of fraud are untrue, and this fact-check article does not disprove the claim that thousands of dead people voted in Michigan in 2020.

 

[mark francis]

arizona said they were timely and non biased. i believe them over a moron like you.

Fraud denying morons made the unproven claims and you blindly believe them. That is nothing for you to be proud of.

The multi-layered forensic audit is comprised of three separate audits performed by two United States Elections Assistance Commission Voting System Testing Laboratories and a Certified Public Accounting Firm.

The audit of the tabulation equipment’s software and hardware was performing by two independent Voting System Testing Laboratories: Pro V&V and SLI Compliance. The firms were hired to:

• Analyze election equipment software and hardware’s hacking vulnerability
• Verify that no malicious malware was installed
• Test that tabulators were not sending or receiving information over the internet
• Confirm that no vote switching occurred

As an added measure of transparency, the Board hired a reputable Certified Public Accounting firm, Berry Dunn, to review county contracts with Dominion Voting Services and verify that the county leased the tabulation equipment according to state and county procurement regulations

Maricopa County’s election equipment and software passed all tests performed by two independent firms hired to conduct the forensic audit, according to reports by two federally certified Voting System Testing Laboratories.

You are talking about the pre-election audit, not an audit that examined the heart and soul of election machines immediately after the election in order to prove they were not corrupted in the election.

you are a total moron. lol. i enjoy making you look stupid.

 

[mark francis]

It reminds me of you birthers promoting Obama was not American. The revelation of the truth shut your mouths.

Democrats refused to allow forensics examiners to examine the certificate of live birth the Democrats finally produced two years after he was elected. Why do Democrats not allow professional experts to examine machines and documents to prove their honestly and legitimacy? It looks like Democrats do not want the items examined because they are hiding something.

 

[pjmret]

Fraud denying morons made the unproven claims and you blindly believe them. That is nothing for you to be proud of.



You are talking about the pre-election audit, not an audit that examined the heart and soul of election machines immediately after the election in order to prove they were not corrupted in the election.

no, it was a post election audit moron.

god you're stupid. lol

 

[pjmret]

Democrats refused to allow forensics examiners to examine the certificate of live birth the Democrats finally produced two years after he was elected. Why do Democrats not allow professional experts to examine machines and documents to prove their honestly and legitimacy? It looks like Democrats do not want the items examined because they are hiding something.

arizona for example did a post election forensic audit moron. lol

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats refused to allow forensics examiners to examine the certificate of live birth the Democrats finally produced two years after he was elected. Why do Democrats not allow professional experts to examine machines and documents to prove their honestly and legitimacy? It looks like Democrats do not want the items examined because they are hiding something.

Fuck off mark. You are becoming a whinging whining pest.

 

[Boris Norris]

How many votes were actually cast in the names of dead people and can you support your speculation or assertion with facts. Respectable researchers have discovered that thousands of votes were cast in the names of dead people in 2020 and those researchers have not yet been proven wrong. This report fact-checks a claim that 14,000 votes were cast in the name of dead people in one Michigan county in 2020. I want to believe facts no matter where they take me.

You fucking liar. There is no evidence this ever took place but you want to believe facts??
There's your facts but you continue as if it is false.
You're out if your tree.

so I want to see what exactly this fact-check article disproves and does not disprove.

Fact check: False claim that 14,000 dead people voted in Michigan (usatoday.com)

Fact check: No evidence that 14,000 dead people cast ballots in Wayne County, Michigan (we must read on for proof of that claim)
McKenzie Sadeghi

USA TODAY:09

The claim: 14,000 dead people voted in Wayne County, Michigan (I believe we can safely say that claim was made since this article is challenging it.)

Attempting to discredit election results in a battleground state, a number of social media posts shared this week make the claim that thousands of voters in Michigan had cast a ballot under the names of deceased people.

"Here is a list of 14+ thousand dead people who voted in Wayne County (Detroit)," reads a Facebook post from The Liberalists that directs to an invalid link. (We must assume the fact that the link is now invalid means nothing since it we don't know why it is no longer valid and the author of this paper does not claim an invalid link makes the whole claim invalid.
The page asks users to "verify it" by doing a search of the names on the Michigan Voter Information Center.

In a message to USA TODAY, The Liberalists said the link was to a database list of dead people you could put in yourself, but that the link was removed by Facebook. Congress is currently investigating Facebook's attacks on conservative speech to help the Democrats in the 2020 election. We should not be surprised if Facebook took the link down for that reason.

Many voters on list are old, but still alive How many invalid names on the list of 14,000 have been found to still be living? They don't say, meaning they have not disproven that thousands of votes were cast in the names of dead people.

The link that the user claimed to be evidence is no longer available. The site reads that it has been "expired, removed by its creator, or removed by one of the Pastebin staff." (Leftist government censorship? The author does not say.)

However, while the link was still live, PolitiFact found that the voters listed were over the age of 100 but several were not marked in Michigan's voter information center and not all were Wayne County residents.

One of the alleged dead voters listed, Imo Oliver, of Ypsilanti, is still alive, according to PolitiFact. She said she suffered from memory loss but that her son helped her to vote in the 2020 election. (One of the 14,000 dead voters is actually still alive? How many does that leave on the list of dead voters?)

Fact check: False claim that deceased Michigan man voted in 2020 (Fact-checkers claim another man was falsely listed, but they list no proof.)

 

[mark francis]

no, it was a post election audit moron.

god you're stupid. lol

Really? Who investigated the machines? How many machines were investigated and how soon after the election were they examined, soon enough to have prevented operators from erasing data from the machines? Did the investigators provide a detailed report as to how the investigations were conducted and what exactly was found? Have these people explained why republican investigators were not allowed to examine the machines or were prohibited from examining certain info on the machines that voting machine manufacturers claim were off-limits to investigators?

Judge orders Georgia officials not to 'erase' data from Dominion voting machines in 3 counties - TheBlaze

 

[mark francis]

arizona for example did a post election forensic audit moron. lol

Let's see what they reported about their examination methods, the extent of their examinations, the number of machines they examined, which precinct machines were examined, their evidence of non-bias, and their detailed findings. Otherwise, we have no way of verifying the whole claim of auditing machines is not a further attempt by election crooks to get away with fraud.

 

[mark francis]

You fucking liar. There is no evidence this ever took place but you want to believe facts??

You should prove the research findings of 14,000 dead voters in Michigan is false if you claim it is false.

 

[Boris Norris]

You should prove the research findings of 14,000 dead voters in Michigan is false if you claim it is false.

No. You made the claim, you prove it. I know you can't so it's best you drop the subject and read your Bible. It has no truth in it whatsoever. Just like what your providing.

 

[Boris Norris]

Really? Who investigated the machines? How many machines were investigated and how soon after the election were they examined, soon enough to have prevented operators from erasing data from the machines? Did the investigators provide a detailed report as to how the investigations were conducted and what exactly was found? Have these people explained why republican investigators were not allowed to examine the machines or were prohibited from examining certain info on the machines that voting machine manufacturers claim were off-limits to investigators?

Judge orders Georgia officials not to 'erase' data from Dominion voting machines in 3 counties - TheBlaze

That's correct and nor should it be erased. It is evidential proof nothing happened.

Two and a half years have passed and still you have nothing but you dyck in your hand. Grow up

 

[mark francis]

No. You made the claim, you prove it. I know you can't so it's best you drop the subject and read your Bible. It has no truth in it whatsoever. Just like what your providing.

I did not make the claim, expert investigators did, and their claims remain unreproved.