Well well well.

competent inspectors have looked at voting machines.

you're a moron.
Card-carrying Democrat, certified, verified, licensed, authorized, leftist, fraud-denying, Democrat- approved examiners have examined the Democrat-controlled machines and found no Democrat voter fraud. Nobody should be surprised at that verdict, especially since Democrats are so clearly opposed to non-Democrat-approved inspections of their protected voting machines they bought from companies connected to George Soros and Venezuela corruption.
 
Werbung:
democrats haven't said that. lol.

you're a moron
Americans should stop using voting machines that have been proven to be susceptible to fraud in elections if Democrats refuse to have those machines examined after every election to prove they were not corrupted during the election.


Electronic Voting Machine Problems Raise Early Concerns | Fox News

Published December 23, 2015 11:40pm EST​

Electronic Voting Machine Problems Raise Early Concerns
By Ed Barnes , | Fox News

An iVotronic voting machine.

Early monitoring of voting around the country is raising concerns about electronic voting machines in key battleground states -- especially in Pennsylvania, where machines are registering Democratic votes instead of Republican, and vice versa.
 
sure, and in the few cases that it happens people are prosecuted.
Nonsense. Voting fraud in the names of dead people is pervasive with few prosecutions. If you claim otherwise you should try to prove your claim.

What is rare are cases where voters with the same name and birthdate as a dead person turns up on lists of names of dead people who have voted. Sadly, Democrats do not do cross-checks to ensure that dead voter fraud is not widespread, either because they do not believe such a thing is possible or they do not want people knowing such a thing is occurring.

US Election 2020: The 'dead voters' in Michigan who are still alive - BBC News

10,000 'dead absentee voters' in Michigan?

The story starts with a list of around 10,000 names posted on Twitter by a Trump-supporting activist.
 
Nonsense. Voting fraud in the names of dead people is pervasive with few prosecutions. If you claim otherwise you should try to prove your claim.

What is rare are cases where voters with the same name and birthdate as a dead person turns up on lists of names of dead people who have voted. Sadly, Democrats do not do cross-checks to ensure that dead voter fraud is not widespread, either because they do not believe such a thing is possible or they do not want people knowing such a thing is occurring.

US Election 2020: The 'dead voters' in Michigan who are still alive - BBC News

10,000 'dead absentee voters' in Michigan?

The story starts with a list of around 10,000 names posted on Twitter by a Trump-supporting activist.

"pervasive"? how man is "pervasive" moron? its another weasal word.

how many ILLEGAL votes were there, moron? duh
 
Americans should stop using voting machines that have been proven to be susceptible to fraud in elections if Democrats refuse to have those machines examined after every election to prove they were not corrupted during the election.


Electronic Voting Machine Problems Raise Early Concerns | Fox News

Published December 23, 2015 11:40pm EST​

Electronic Voting Machine Problems Raise Early Concerns
By Ed Barnes , | Fox News

An iVotronic voting machine.

Early monitoring of voting around the country is raising concerns about electronic voting machines in key battleground states -- especially in Pennsylvania, where machines are registering Democratic votes instead of Republican, and vice versa.

"concerns"..in 2015.

let me know wnen you have proven farud in 2020 moron. lol
 
Card-carrying Democrat, certified, verified, licensed, authorized, leftist, fraud-denying, Democrat- approved examiners have examined the Democrat-controlled machines and found no Democrat voter fraud. Nobody should be surprised at that verdict, especially since Democrats are so clearly opposed to non-Democrat-approved inspections of their protected voting machines they bought from companies connected to George Soros and Venezuela corruption.

nope independent certified auditors did it in arizona for eample, as i've posted many times.

you're just a moron.
 
no one denies tiny amounts of voter fraud exist, often by republicans. duh.

you morons have failed to produce credible evidence of a stolen election after all this time. lol.

you are morons
You cannot prove the fraud was minimal because you have done no investigation. You simply repeat the Democrat denials without proof.
 
"pervasive"? how man is "pervasive" moron? its another weasal word.

how many ILLEGAL votes were there, moron? duh
Nobody knows how many fraudulent votes were cast for Biden but the evidence suggests the fraudulent votes number in the millions.
 
"concerns"..in 2015.

let me know wnen you have proven farud in 2020 moron. lol
The susceptibility of voting machines to fraud is a well-established fact. Democrat obstructions to investigations into the voting records of susceptible machines is a well-established fact. Because of the failure to investigate voting machine records immediately after the election Democrats can now never wipe away the reasonable suspicions that voting machines were used to steal the 2020 elections and were later wiped clean of incriminating evidence.
 
nope independent certified auditors did it in arizona for eample, as i've posted many times.

you're just a moron.
You have failed to prove the investigations into the machines were timely, thorough and conducted by non-biased forensics experts.
 
Card-carrying Democrat, certified, verified, licensed, authorized, leftist, fraud-denying, Democrat- approved examiners have examined the Democrat-controlled machines and found no Democrat voter fraud. Nobody should be surprised at that verdict, especially since Democrats are so clearly opposed to non-Democrat-approved inspections of their protected voting machines they bought from companies connected to George Soros and Venezuela corruption.
nope. independent credentialed auditors did, for example in arizona.

you're a card carrying moron.
 
Werbung:
You have failed to prove the investigations into the machines were timely, thorough and conducted by non-biased forensics experts.

arizona said they were timely and non biased. i believe them over a moron like you.

The multi-layered forensic audit is comprised of three separate audits performed by two United States Elections Assistance Commission Voting System Testing Laboratories and a Certified Public Accounting Firm.

The audit of the tabulation equipment’s software and hardware was performing by two independent Voting System Testing Laboratories: Pro V&V and SLI Compliance. The firms were hired to:

  • Analyze election equipment software and hardware’s hacking vulnerability
  • Verify that no malicious malware was installed
  • Test that tabulators were not sending or receiving information over the internet
  • Confirm that no vote switching occurred

As an added measure of transparency, the Board hired a reputable Certified Public Accounting firm, Berry Dunn, to review county contracts with Dominion Voting Services and verify that the county leased the tabulation equipment according to state and county procurement regulations

Maricopa County’s election equipment and software passed all tests performed by two independent firms hired to conduct the forensic audit, according to reports by two federally certified Voting System Testing Laboratories.



you are a total moron. lol. i enjoy making you look stupid.
 
Back
Top