The claimed evidence wasWhat was ludicrous, evidence of voter fraud that had never been adequately refuted?
The claimed evidence wasWhat was ludicrous, evidence of voter fraud that had never been adequately refuted?
Serious Americans don't laugh at evidence of voter fraud that remains unrefuted.The claimed evidence was
If the evidence is ludicrous they doSerious Americans don't laugh at evidence of voter fraud that remains unrefuted.
Failing to resolve voting fraud issues arising from serious evidence of fraud does not make them laughable or make them go away.If the evidence is ludicrous they do
No, being laughable makes it laughableFailing to resolve voting fraud issues arising from serious evidence of fraud does not make them laughable or make them go away.
Casually examining evidence of massive voter fraud with a biased eye and dismissing it is a long way from disproving evidence of massive voter fraud.No, being laughable makes it laughable
The so called evidence wasn't credible to intelligent people
You couldn't even convince Trump judges lolCasually examining evidence of massive voter fraud with a biased eye and dismissing it is a long way from disproving evidence of massive voter fraud.
What are you saying Trump judges wanted or needed? No judge examined corruptible voting machines to see if they had been corrupted in the 2020 election. What reason do we have to expect the courts to rule on the extent that voting machines may have been corrupted, and if courts have no idea whether voting machines were corrupted or to what extent they may have been corrupted then why should we expect courts to prove no massive voting fraud occurred in 2020?You couldn't even convince Trump judges lol
How pathetic
If your evidence can't even convince Trump judges it must truly be pathetic lolWhat are you saying Trump judges wanted or needed? No judge examined corruptible voting machines to see if they had been corrupted in the 2020 election. What reason do we have to expect the courts to rule on the extent that voting machines may have been corrupted, and if courts have no idea whether voting machines were corrupted or to what extent they may have been corrupted then why should we expect courts to prove no massive voting fraud occurred in 2020?
I have nothing to prove to judges and they certainly cannot prove Democrats did not steal the 2020 election by massive fraud.If your evidence can't even convince Trump judges it must truly be pathetic lol
True you have nothing to prove since you can't prove your liesI have nothing to prove to judges and they certainly cannot prove Democrats did not steal the 2020 election by massive fraud.
I rest comfortably knowing you cannot prove your claim that voting fraud evidence is untrue.True you have nothing to prove since you can't prove your lies
I rest comfo knowing you couldn't convince Trump judges even lolI rest comfortably knowing you cannot prove your claim that voting fraud evidence is untrue.
Don't try to get judges to investigate voter fraud. That is not their job and for good reason. No judge in the country can prove evidence of fraud is untrue.I rest comfo knowing you couldn't convince Trump judges even lol
Let me know when you prove no fraud occurred in 2016 to let Trump win lo.
I don't try that I just enjoy how you list every caseDon't try to get judges to investigate voter fraud. That is not their job and for good reason. No judge in the country can prove evidence of fraud is untrue.