So much for the earth being 6000 years old.

[Boris Norris]

Yet another speculation about the Y Chromosome. I suspect the sky must be the limit for such guesses.

Not my guess. It proves you are wrong so deal with it.

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

There are similarities of DNA between humans and chimps and humans and Neanderthals and humans and rats, but the assumptions and conclusions about relatedness due to similarities remain debatable.

False. That's why nobody is debating it. Least of all you.

 

[Tripoli]

DNA is a fact, but assumptions of blood relatedness between humans and rats based upon DNA similarities are not facts.

DNA matching is a perfect science, your approval is not needed

 

[mark francis]

debateable by you perhaps.
credible scientists dont debate humans have neanderthal dna.

The dull and ignorant who are comfortable with the status quo have little motivation to challenge unproven secularist calculations, interpretations and conclusions.

 

[mark francis]

meaningless word salad. lol

No comment? Researchers first reported that the evidence showed there had been no admixture between Neanderthals and modern humans living at the same time in the same locality.
No evidence of Neandertal admixture in the mitochondrial genomes of early European modern humans and contemporary Europeans - PubMed (nih.gov) 8-24-11

Am J Phys Anthropol

. 2011 Oct;146(2):242-52.

doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21569. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

No evidence of Neandertal admixture in the mitochondrial genomes of early European modern humans and contemporary Europeans

 

[mark francis]

False. That's why nobody is debating it. Least of all you.

Some of this crap is not worth debating.

Genome Res. 2004 Apr; 14(4): 507–516.
doi: 10.1101/gr.1975204
PMCID: PMC383294
PMID: 15059991

Reconstructing the Genomic Architecture of Ancestral Mammals: Lessons From Human, Mouse, and Rat Genomes​

Guillaume Bourque,1 Pavel A. Pevzner,2 and Glenn Tesler3,4
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
Go to:

Abstract​

Recent analysis of genome rearrangements in human and mouse genomes revealed evidence for more rearrangements than thought previously and shed light on previously unknown features of mammalian evolution, like breakpoint reuse and numerous microrearrangements. However, two-way analysis cannot reveal the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals or assign rearrangement events to different lineages. Thus, the “original synteny” problem introduced by Nadeau and Sankoff previously, remains unsolved, as at least three mammalian genomes are required to derive the ancestral mammalian karyotype. ...

Finding the genomic distance is a difficult combinatorial problem. The shortcoming of early genome rearrangement studies is that they considered breakpoints independently without revealing combinatorial dependencies between related breakpoints....

These results, although useful, do not yet yield a meaningful estimate of the number of the rearrangement events. The problem is that the genomic sequences provide evidence for both microrearrangements (e.g., intrachromosomal rearrangements with a relatively small span) and macrorearrangements (e.g., intrachromosomal rearrangements of larger span, as well as interchromosomal rearrangements). ...

Such local assembly errors are manifested as fictitious microrearrangements. ...

Multiple microrearrangements within synteny blocks call for development of new synteny block generation algorithms that adequately address the complex rearrangement history of mammalian genomes. ...

As a result, GRIMM-Synteny allows one to study micro- and macrorearrangements separately and to estimate the number of both macrorearrangements and microrearrangements between human, mouse, and rat. This separation into macro- and microrearrangements is an artificial one depending on the choice of parameters, and we hope that in the future, more natural criteria will be found to separate them. ...

Molecular evolution studies are usually based on the analysis of individual genes rather than entire genomes. An alternative approach is to infer the evolutionary history of entire genomes, rather than individual genes, on the basis of the analysis of gene orders. Human, mouse, and rat genomic sequences, for the first time, provide the opportunity to accurately estimate the extent of rearrangement events and to derive the putative genomic architecture of ancestral mammalian genomes. ...

METHODS AND RESULTS​

Synteny Blocks​

We demonstrate that human and rat share 417 synteny blocks of size at least 300 kb, on the basis of the current assemblies. (Human and mouse share 394, whereas mouse and rat share 162.) Rearrangements in the mouse lineage further break some of the human–rat synteny blocks into smaller blocks, thus creating an even more granular representation of comparative genomic architecture of three species (Fig. 1). However, many of these newly formed synteny blocks are too short to pass the 300-kb block-length threshold, so the number of three-way human–mouse–rat synteny blocks of length 300 kb or longer is reduced to 391 (see Tables Tables11 and and22 for details).5

Bottom line. When attempting to support wild evolutionary theories just fill the space with sciencey-sounding assumptions, speculations, computer models, biased-based analyses, and so forth.

 

[mark francis]

DNA matching is a perfect science, your approval is not needed

Assumptions about ancestral relatedness between humans and other life forms are not settled science but unproven theories, speculations, and biased computations.

 

[Tripoli]

Assumptions about ancestral relatedness between humans and other life forms are not settled science but unproven theories, speculations, and biased computations.

You are actually proof that humans and morons mated as you clearly have a high percentage of Neanderthal DNA

 

[mark francis]

You are actually proof that humans and morons mated as you clearly have a high percentage of Neanderthal DNA

Opinions are not proven facts.

 

[Tripoli]

Opinions are not proven facts.

LOL tell the judge that DNA is his opinion and that you can't be convicted on an opinion

 

[mark francis]

LOL tell the judge that DNA is his opinion and that you can't be convicted on an opinion

DNA is a God-created fact. DNA-based assumptions of human and mice relatedness are not proven facts.

 

[pjmret]

The dull and ignorant who are comfortable with the status quo have little motivation to challenge unproven secularist calculations, interpretations and conclusions.

you sound dull and ignorant with that word salad comment