So much for the earth being 6000 years old.

Werbung:
Old god seemed to have got his dates wrong.
More speculations I see. Scientists cannot even agree on whether modern humans and Neanderthals ever mated or could have mated, much less when they first appeared on earth.

Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe​

 
More speculations I see. Scientists cannot even agree on whether modern humans and Neanderthals ever mated or could have mated, much less when they first appeared on earth.

Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe​

Actually Modern humans are proved to have mated with Neanderthals because all humans have Neanderthal DNA

This information is generally reported as a percentage that suggests how much DNA an individual has inherited from these ancestors. The percentage of Neanderthal DNA in modern humans is zero or close to zero in people from African populations, and is about 1 to 2 percent in people of European or Asian background.
 
More speculations I see. Scientists cannot even agree on whether modern humans and Neanderthals ever mated or could have mated, much less when they first appeared on earth.

Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe​

More speculations I see. Scientists cannot even agree on whether modern humans and Neanderthals ever mated or could have mated, much less when they first appeared on earth.

Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe​

All that goes against your religion
 
Actually Modern humans are proved to have mated with Neanderthals because all humans have Neanderthal DNA

This information is generally reported as a percentage that suggests how much DNA an individual has inherited from these ancestors. The percentage of Neanderthal DNA in modern humans is zero or close to zero in people from African populations, and is about 1 to 2 percent in people of European or Asian background.
Secularists with apriorist views about Neanderthals have come up with computer models and other devices to overturn the scientific evidence that Neanderthals did not intermix with modern humans.

The bare scientific data seems to prove there was never any admixture between modern humans and Neanderthals.

No evidence of a Neanderthal contribution to modern human diversity | Genome Biology | Full Text (biomedcentral.com) 2-18-08
No evidence of a Neanderthal contribution to modern human diversity
Jason A Hodgson &

Genome Biology volume 9, Article number: 206 (2008) Cite this article

Abstract
The relationship between Neanderthals and modern humans is contentious, but recent advances in Neanderthal genomics have shed new light on their evolutionary history. Here we review the available evidence and find no indication of any Neanderthal contribution to modern genetic diversity.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe - PMC (nih.gov)

PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec; 2(12): e421.

Published online 2004 Nov 30. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020421
PMCID: PMC532389
PMID: 15562317

Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

No evidence of Neandertal admixture in the mitochondrial genomes of early European modern humans and contemporary Europeans - PubMed (nih.gov) 8-24-11
Am J Phys Anthropol

2011 Oct;146(2):242-52.

doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21569. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

No evidence of Neandertal admixture in the mitochondrial genomes of early European modern humans and contemporary Europeans
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
However, the scientific data does not totally convince those wishing to preserve the speculations, assumptions and theories that Neanderthals and modern humans did interbreed. This report is from one such modern theorist:


Homo sapiens and Neanderthals may have interbred, new research shows : NPR 2-4-24

Homo sapiens and Neanderthals may have interbred, new research shows

Perhaps we should point out that "may have interbred" and "did interbreed" are two entirely different claims.
 
Secularists with apriorist views about Neanderthals have come up with computer models and other devices to overturn the scientific evidence that Neanderthals did not intermix with modern humans.

The bare scientific data seems to prove there was never any admixture between modern humans and Neanderthals.

No evidence of a Neanderthal contribution to modern human diversity | Genome Biology | Full Text (biomedcentral.com) 2-18-08
No evidence of a Neanderthal contribution to modern human diversity
Jason A Hodgson &

Genome Biology volume 9, Article number: 206 (2008) Cite this article

Abstract
The relationship between Neanderthals and modern humans is contentious, but recent advances in Neanderthal genomics have shed new light on their evolutionary history. Here we review the available evidence and find no indication of any Neanderthal contribution to modern genetic diversity.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe - PMC (nih.gov)

PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec; 2(12): e421.

Published online 2004 Nov 30. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020421
PMCID: PMC532389
PMID: 15562317

Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

No evidence of Neandertal admixture in the mitochondrial genomes of early European modern humans and contemporary Europeans - PubMed (nih.gov) 8-24-11
Am J Phys Anthropol

2011 Oct;146(2):242-52.

doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21569. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

No evidence of Neandertal admixture in the mitochondrial genomes of early European modern humans and contemporary Europeans
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
However, the scientific data does not totally convince those wishing to preserve the speculations, assumptions and theories that Neanderthals and modern humans did interbreed. This report is from one such modern theorist:


Homo sapiens and Neanderthals may have interbred, new research shows : NPR 2-4-24

Homo sapiens and Neanderthals may have interbred, new research shows

Perhaps we should point out that "may have interbred" and "did interbreed" are two entirely different claims.
You have 1 to 2 percent Neanderthal genes. So accept it kid.

Neandertals and anatomically modern humans overlapped geographically for a period of over 30,000 years following human migration out of Africa. During this period, Neandertals and humans interbred, as evidenced by Neandertal portions of the genome carried by non-African individuals today. A key observation is that the proportion of Neandertal ancestry is ~12–20% higher in East Asian individuals relative to European individuals. Here, we explore various demographic models that could explain this observation. These include distinguishing between a single admixture event and multiple Neandertal contributions to either population, and the hypothesis that reduced Neandertal ancestry in modern Europeans resulted from more recent admixture with a ghost population that lacked a Neandertal ancestry component (the “dilution” hypothesis). In order to summarize the asymmetric pattern of Neandertal allele frequencies, we compile the joint fragment frequency spectrum (FFS) of European and East Asian Neandertal fragments and compare it to both analytical theory and data simulated under various models of admixture. Using maximum likelihood and machine learning, we found that a simple model of a single admixture does not fit the empirical data and instead favor a model of multiple episodes of gene flow into both European and East Asian populations. These findings indicate more long-term, complex interaction between humans and Neandertals than previously appreciated.
 
You have 1 to 2 percent Neanderthal genes. So accept it kid.

Neandertals and anatomically modern humans overlapped geographically for a period of over 30,000 years following human migration out of Africa. During this period, Neandertals and humans interbred, as evidenced by Neandertal portions of the genome carried by non-African individuals today. A key observation is that the proportion of Neandertal ancestry is ~12–20% higher in East Asian individuals relative to European individuals. Here, we explore various demographic models that could explain this observation. These include distinguishing between a single admixture event and multiple Neandertal contributions to either population, and the hypothesis that reduced Neandertal ancestry in modern Europeans resulted from more recent admixture with a ghost population that lacked a Neandertal ancestry component (the “dilution” hypothesis). In order to summarize the asymmetric pattern of Neandertal allele frequencies, we compile the joint fragment frequency spectrum (FFS) of European and East Asian Neandertal fragments and compare it to both analytical theory and data simulated under various models of admixture. Using maximum likelihood and machine learning, we found that a simple model of a single admixture does not fit the empirical data and instead favor a model of multiple episodes of gene flow into both European and East Asian populations. These findings indicate more long-term, complex interaction between humans and Neandertals than previously appreciated.
I do not see that claim proven in scientific literature. Unsupported claims are hardly proof.
 
I do not see that claim proven in scientific literature. Unsupported claims are hardly proof.
Then you also do not understand gene mapping. Which makes you like the rest of the Baptist morons who believe that the Earth is 6000 years old
 
I do not see that claim proven in scientific literature. Unsupported claims are hardly proof.
You are a Baptist retard who rejects all of science in favor of the retarded minister who screams at you because he knows that you are a moron.

Have we mapped Neanderthal DNA?


Ancient DNA and Neanderthals | The Smithsonian Institution's ...


After successfully sequencing large amounts of mtDNA, a team led by Svante Pääbo from the Max Planck Institute reported the first complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence for a Neanderthal (Green et al. 2008). The sample was taken from a 38,000 year old Neanderthal from Vindija Cave, Croatia.

https://www.mpg.de/13894984/neander...n 2010, when,genetic roots are outside Africa.
 
I don't think that there is substantial evidence that Neanderthals were stupid. It is entirely possible that they became extinct due to some disease.
 
I don't think that there is substantial evidence that Neanderthals were stupid. It is entirely possible that they became extinct due to some disease.
The prevailing theory is that Neanderthals were inferior to homo sapiens, and that interbreeding and assimilation rendered them extinct, much like what is happening now with the American Indians
 
Then you also do not understand gene mapping. Which makes you like the rest of the Baptist morons who believe that the Earth is 6000 years old
I do believe the earth is only thousands of years old, not billions. If the earth is billions of years old, then we cannot trust dating methods that rely on the scientific principles of uniformity. Also, when old age assumptions are contradicted by the principles of uniformity the unprovable assumptions that uniformity was not uniform in those cases is evidence the secularists are simply attempting to avoid the scientific evidence that their assumptions and conclusions are flawed.

Uniformitarianism - Wikipedia

Uniformitarianism

Methodological assumptions[edit]

The two methodological assumptions below are accepted to be true by the majority of scientists and geologists. Gould claims that these philosophical propositions must be assumed before you can proceed as a scientist doing science. "You cannot go to a rocky outcrop and observe either the constancy of nature's laws or the working of unknown processes. It works the other way around." You first assume these propositions and "then you go to the outcrop."[30]

Uniformity of law across time and space: Natural laws are constant across space and time.[31]

The axiom of uniformity of law [3][7][31] is necessary in order for scientists to extrapolate (by inductive inference) into the unobservable past.[3][31] The constancy of natural laws must be assumed in the study of the past; else we cannot meaningfully study it.[3][7][31][32]

Uniformity of process across time and space: Natural processes are constant across time and space.

Though similar to uniformity of law, this second a priori assumption, shared by the vast majority of scientists, deals with geological causes, not physicochemical laws.[33] The past is to be explained by processes acting currently in time and space rather than inventing extra esoteric or unknown processes without good reason,[34][35] otherwise known as parsimony or Occam's razor.
 
The prevailing theory is that Neanderthals were inferior to homo sapiens, and that interbreeding and assimilation rendered them extinct, much like what is happening now with the American Indians
UNbeknownst to you, every year, there are MORE American Indians in this country. They are not becoming extinct.
The photo of Trump's half dozen paid Black people is silly, you need to know that.
 
Werbung:
I do believe the earth is only thousands of years old, not billions. If the earth is billions of years old, then we cannot trust dating methods that rely on the scientific principles of uniformity. Also, when old age assumptions are contradicted by the principles of uniformity the unprovable assumptions that uniformity was not uniform in those cases is evidence the secularists are simply attempting to avoid the scientific evidence that their assumptions and conclusions are flawed.

Uniformitarianism - Wikipedia

Uniformitarianism

Methodological assumptions[edit]

The two methodological assumptions below are accepted to be true by the majority of scientists and geologists. Gould claims that these philosophical propositions must be assumed before you can proceed as a scientist doing science. "You cannot go to a rocky outcrop and observe either the constancy of nature's laws or the working of unknown processes. It works the other way around." You first assume these propositions and "then you go to the outcrop."[30]

Uniformity of law across time and space: Natural laws are constant across space and time.[31]

The axiom of uniformity of law [3][7][31] is necessary in order for scientists to extrapolate (by inductive inference) into the unobservable past.[3][31] The constancy of natural laws must be assumed in the study of the past; else we cannot meaningfully study it.[3][7][31][32]

Uniformity of process across time and space: Natural processes are constant across time and space.

Though similar to uniformity of law, this second a priori assumption, shared by the vast majority of scientists, deals with geological causes, not physicochemical laws.[33] The past is to be explained by processes acting currently in time and space rather than inventing extra esoteric or unknown processes without good reason,[34][35] otherwise known as parsimony or Occam's razor.
You are an anal retentive fool who gets his information from a screaming Baptist minister. You do not accept or believe in any type of science at all, and I would bet that you have at least 4% Neandertal genes which would account for at least some of your stupidity. There are thousands of ways to date the Earth, but not for Jehovah's and snake wigglers like you. God and science are 100% compatible as God is merely the best scientist that we know of as he writes in DNA which lives forever and improves itself constantly, with the exception of dumb Baptist that is.

https://a-z-animals.com/blog/oldest-living-organisms-in-the-world/

LOL some sponges are 15,000 years old. Tell the snake wiggler and chief

churches-that-use-snakes-768x576.jpg
 
Back
Top