Rigged Nomination

Werbung:
Your opinions and judgements on such things don't advance the discussion or your image. It makes you look cheap and more interested in offending than discussing.
Actually you servicing Sanders like a two-dollar whore makes you look cheap and pathetic. You worship some would-be Communist dictator and you think you are taking the high road?!

And he's a . . . . . . "communist"??? I think you contradict yourself.
Not at all. Many Communists are war-mongers!

And let me explain the American party system: Working folk are Democrats. The middle class are Republicans. The upper class are Marxists.

If you want to find Marxists look for the spoiled children of some investment banker.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/111242/rich-kids-occupy-wall-street-daniel-flynn
 
Actually you servicing Sanders like a two-dollar whore makes you look cheap and pathetic. You worship some would-be Communist dictator and you think you are taking the high road?!

Not at all. Many Communists are war-mongers!

And let me explain the American party system: Working folk are Democrats. The middle class are Republicans. The upper class are Marxists.

If you want to find Marxists look for the spoiled children of some investment banker.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/111242/rich-kids-occupy-wall-street-daniel-flynn
How many OWS were silver Spooners?
A lot
 
Why do you spout such nonsense?
Right, accuse your opponent of what you are guilty of. Good right wing tool.

And let me explain the American party system: Working folk are Democrats. The middle class are Republicans. The upper class are Marxists.
Wow. You truly know nothing of what you speak! You're talking like a high school dropout with ignorant right wing extremist parents. Maybe you are.

Actually you servicing Sanders like a two-dollar whore makes you look cheap and pathetic. You worship some would-be Communist dictator and you think you are taking the high road?!
Hey, you know what? Shove it, arschloch. You're WAY out of your league so you have no choice but to resort to insults and attacks like a common and insipid laggard.
 
How many OWS were silver Spooners?
A lot
Well dogtowner, you're a moderator here and know the rules on personal attacks but you let this guy get away with exactly that as the main content of that post???

Since nothing was done about it I returned his crudeness in kind. Somebody had to take some kind of action against such childish tantrums.

It really is pathetic when a person is so weak with any kind of substantive support for his position that he resorts to childish insults and attacks instead of being an adult about it.
 
Well dogtowner, you're a moderator here and know the rules on personal attacks but you let this guy get away with exactly that as the main content of that post???

Since nothing was done about it I returned his crudeness in kind. Somebody had to take some kind of action against such childish tantrums.

It really is pathetic when a person is so weak with any kind of substantive support for his position that he resorts to childish insults and attacks instead of being an adult about it.
If I acted every time there would be no content and I would be villified.
And as you have demonstrated a willingness to do exactly what you would have another not I seem to be justified.
But if you view me as an abject failure by all means contact Walter and demand you replace me. You are perfectly welcome to my exorbitant compensation package AND key to the executive bathroom. I look forward to my pink slip.
Just ribbing you but you are welcome to replace me. Walter is a nice guy.
 
Actually you servicing Sanders like a two-dollar whore makes you look cheap and pathetic. You worship some would-be Communist dictator and you think you are taking the high road?!

Why is it you are so find of homosexual sex?

Not at all. Many Communists are war-mongers!

But not quite like the fascists you support.

And let me explain the American party system: Working folk are Democrats. The middle class are Republicans. The upper class are Marxists.

Working folk are the ones that pay the bills. Good to see you finally recognized that point. Middle class are not the working poor, and the Republicans are losing numbers. The upper class are Plutocrats.

If you want to find Marxists look for the spoiled children of some investment banker.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/111242/rich-kids-occupy-wall-street-daniel-flynn

Or some real estate mogul. However, would you consider the Founding fathers to be "Marxists"?

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/04/founding-fathers-warned-inequality.html

Thomas Jefferson wrote when visiting France:

"I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable. But the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. The descent of property of every kind therefore to all the children, or to all the brothers and sisters, or other relations in equal degree is a politic measure, and a practicable one. Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there is in any country, uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right. The earth is given as a common stock for man to labour and live on. If, for the encouragement of industry we allow it to be appropriated, we must take care that other employment be furnished to those excluded from the appropriation. If we do not the fundamental right to labour the earth returns to the unemployed. It is too soon yet in our country to say that every man who cannot find employment but who can find uncultivated land, shall be at liberty to cultivate it, paying a moderate rent. But it is not too soon to provide by every possible means that as few as possible shall be without a little portion of land."


BTW, from your article: "Movements speaking for the poor have always been led by the very rich."
 
You're talking like a high school dropout with ignorant right wing extremist parents.
You're talking like a Marxist fanatic conceived in a filthy alley in Leningrad.

Hey, you know what? Shove it, arschloch. You're WAY out of your league so you have no choice but to resort to insults and attacks like a common and insipid laggard.
Lol. You engage in name calling and then criticize me for name calling. Don't be such a clown.

Try to refute any of these statements if you can:
  • Sanders supports Hillary, an incompetent war-monger.
  • Hillary is a corrupt tool of Wall Street and foreign dictators.
  • The Clinton crime family has betrayed the American people.
  • Communism = mass murder and tyranny.
Or if you prefer you could continue to throw tantrums.
 
Well dogtowner, you're a moderator here and know the rules on personal attacks but you let this guy get away with exactly that as the main content of that post???
Stop whining and relax. You sound like you are about to cry. lol
 
Last edited:
Why is it you are so find of homosexual sex?
But not quite like the fascists you support.
We all know you spend your weekends dressed like a Stormtrooper and hanging out at the YMCA.

However, would you consider the Founding fathers to be "Marxists"?

Thomas Jefferson wrote when visiting France:

"I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable.
1) It's foolish to claim the Founding Fathers were socialists.

More Jefferson quotes:

Agriculture, manufacturers, commerce, and navigation, the four pillars of our prosperity, are then most thriving when left most free to individual enterprise.

On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.

A wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement.

I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That 'all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people' (10th Amendment). To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specifically drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible to any definition.

2) You support Darrell Castle and socialism??


 
So let's review:
TJ visits France looking for friends and makes nice with what they are doing
TJ puts nothing of the kind into our government while he clearly had a voice in it.
 
You're talking like a Marxist fanatic conceived in a filthy alley in Leningrad.

Lol. You engage in name calling and then criticize me for name calling. Don't be such a clown.

Try to refute any of these statements if you can:
  • Sanders supports Hillary, an incompetent war-monger.
  • Hillary is a corrupt tool of Wall Street and foreign dictators.
  • The Clinton crime family has betrayed the American people.
  • Communism = mass murder and tyranny.
Or if you prefer you could continue to throw tantrums.
I seem to recall a number of generalities you whined and which you have not explained or substantiated. When you deal with some of those I'll evaluate to see if you have abandoned your childish behavior and matured enough to engage an adult in conversation. If you have, then I will consider answering the above. Good luck.

BTW, I am disappointed that Hillary is the Democratic nominee. I'm not fond of her. But continue to assume what you want.
 
Werbung:
Mass murder during the Clinton administration:


Both Albright and Bill Clinton are both closely tied to Hillary.
 
Back
Top