Dr.Who
Well-Known Member
And yet, after all the debates.. The current Senate legislation Harry Reid is pusing will still leave 24million un-insured.
So why turn the system upside down and screw eveything up if it does ot solve the problem of the un-insured.
Could it be that the purpose of the legislation is not to offer health care (to those that already have it)? To lower costs (on a system that already gives good value)? To stop rising costs (that are not rising faster than many other aspects of the economy)? etc.
Didn't President Obama just today call the health care bill a social program? Isn't the real purpose of the bill redistribution of wealth while increasing the number of customers that insurance companies have?