Navarro's blistering 36-page report alleging Biden's outright voter fraud

[pjmret]

Are you saying the judge ruled there was no evidence of fraud without realizing the democrats were still refusing to allow unbiased investigators to examine the voting computers that belonged to the American people and that the democrats had no right to totally control access to?

i'm saying, for at least twice, that republican plaintiffs presented no credible evidence of fraud.
what part of that are you too stupid to understand?

again, you think democrats have "total control" in red states?
god you get dumber with every post

 

[pjmret]

What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect - If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced - Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines (thegatewaypundit.com)

What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect – If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced – Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines

god, its so simple. If voting machines are examined by outside uncertified people, there is no way to validate they haven't been compromised.

that's how we keep elections safe, by "chain of custody". duh

god you're stupid

 

[mark francis]

You are a liar. The machines are controlled by the electoral people. You know nothing. The machines were checked by a gop funded audit and found to be working correctly.
Youre not big on research boy.

Democrats complain about Trump's appointments to SCOTUS. Why? Because they know republicans may also appoint biased judges just like democrats can do. Why would any judge not allow reputable forensics examiners to examine voting machines that have been called into question by millions of Americans concerned about the way democrats controlled access to the machines before, during, and after elections? Because the judge is either completely biased against Americans wanting answers, or possibly some other reason. What legitimate reason is there to hide the machines from examiners after the machines were programmed, operated, and controlled by democrat workers with little or no knowledge of forensics?


What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect - If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced - Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines (thegatewaypundit.com)

What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect – If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced – Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines
+++++++++++++++++

PA Supreme Court Blocks Inspection of Voting Machines in Fulton County (wdiy.org)

PA Supreme Court Blocks Inspection of Voting Machines in Fulton County

By Sam Dunklau | WITF

Published January 18, 2022 at 7:15 AM EST

/
Pennsylvania's Supreme Court is blocking an inspection of voting machine equipment in a heavily-Republican midstate county. WITF's Sam Dunklau has more on the development that happened just moments before it was set to begin Friday.​

 

[mark francis]

Name the reasons. Ill wait here. Take your time. I'll bet you can't.

Senator Rand Paul lists some of the reasons courts refuse to take up voter fraud cases without even examining the details.

Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out | Washington Examiner

Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out

by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor |

December 16, 2020 03:04 PM

Sen. Rand Paul rejected the idea that courts have "decided the facts" on the integrity of November's presidential election.

“The courts have not decided the facts,” Paul said Wednesday during a hearing on the integrity of the 2020 election. “The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections, and they stayed out of it by finding an excuse.”

Paul pointed out while speaking with former special counsel Ken Starr that 60 court cases involving voter fraud claims in the election were thrown out for procedural reasons, which Starr agreed with, saying that the “vast majority” were thrown out for procedural reasons rather than merit.

Paul also called on state legislatures to “reaffirm” that election law can only be changed by state legislatures, and he suggested that hearings should take place in the future to listen to state legislators and make sure that is happening.

The Kentucky Republican told Starr that this legal aspect should be heard by the courts and stated that roughly two dozen states made changes to when and how ballots are counted against the will of state legislatures.

Starr said election laws were “flagrantly violated” in Pennsylvania, which President Trump’s legal team has vehemently argued, and Paul agreed with that assessment.

“The legal question there is a very easy one to decide,” Paul said. “Even as a physician, I can figure out that the secretary of state cannot create law.”

He added: “I think there is a lot of work to be done.”

Paul’s comments have been echoed by several prominent conservatives, including radio host Mark Levin, who has taken issue with the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear a legal challenge of the 2020 election that was signed by 17 states.

Levin also slammed the Supreme Court for not taking up a challenge in Pennsylvania over the constitutional question that Paul and Starr discussed in Wednesday’s hearing.

Levin called the justices on the court “fearful” of the political repercussions of hearing the case and accused them of “ducking under the proverbial table.”

 

[mark francis]

i'm saying, for at least twice, that republican plaintiffs presented no credible evidence of fraud.
what part of that are you too stupid to understand?

again, you think democrats have "total control" in red states?
god you get dumber with every post

Two republicans failed to convince courts the evidence of fraud deserved examination? So? If courts refused to get involved it does not matter how much evidence exists or how strong the evidence is the courts will not get involved.

 

[mark francis]

god, its so simple. If voting machines are examined by outside uncertified people, there is no way to validate they haven't been compromised.

that's how we keep elections safe, by "chain of custody". duh

god you're stupid

Why should democrats have total control of American voting machines from the programming stage, through the election, and after the election so that no independent forensics examiner will ever be able to examine them for possible illegal manipulation, especially when those kinds of machines have been linked to George Soros and voter fraud in other countries like Venezuela?

 

[pjmret]

Democrats complain about Trump's appointments to SCOTUS. Why? Because they know republicans may also appoint biased judges just like democrats can do. Why would any judge not allow reputable forensics examiners to examine voting machines that have been called into question by millions of Americans concerned about the way democrats controlled access to the machines before, during, and after elections? Because the judge is either completely biased against Americans wanting answers, or possibly some other reason. What legitimate reason is there to hide the machines from examiners after the machines were programmed, operated, and controlled by democrat workers with little or no knowledge of forensics?


What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect - If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced - Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines (thegatewaypundit.com)

What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect – If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced – Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines
+++++++++++++++++

PA Supreme Court Blocks Inspection of Voting Machines in Fulton County (wdiy.org)

PA Supreme Court Blocks Inspection of Voting Machines in Fulton County

By Sam Dunklau | WITF

Published January 18, 2022 at 7:15 AM EST

/
Pennsylvania's Supreme Court is blocking an inspection of voting machine equipment in a heavily-Republican midstate county. WITF's Sam Dunklau has more on the development that happened just moments before it was set to begin Friday.​

I didn't know that pa state supreme court = "democrats" lol.
show me how their legal reasoning was wrong and based on partisan politics.

"
Wake Technology Services, an IT firm, looked at Fulton County’s now-decertified Dominion voting machines early last year and found no evidence of voter fraud.

Supporters of the effort have not explained how such an inspection would be carried out and have not clearly explained why one is necessary more than a year and a half after the machines were used.

so its already been done, and the people who want to do it can't explain why they need to do it again.

sounds reasonable to me.
why do you think it should be done again?

 

[pjmret]

Why should democrats have total control of American voting machines from the programming stage, through the election, and after the election so that no independent forensics examiner will ever be able to examine them for possible illegal manipulation, especially when those machines have been linked to George Soros and voter fraud in other countries like Venezuela?

prove they do have "total control", *****. lol

give some examples. duh

 

[pjmret]

Two republicans failed to convince courts the evidence of fraud deserved examination? So? If courts refused to get involved it does not matter how much evidence exists or how strong the evidence is the courts will not get involved.

the courts were involved. they heard cases and rejected the evidence. duh. that's what courts do, *****. lol

god you're stupid. lol

 

[Boris Norris]

Senator Rand Paul lists some of the reasons courts refuse to take up voter fraud cases without even examining the details.

Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out | Washington Examiner

Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out

by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor |

December 16, 2020 03:04 PM

Sen. Rand Paul rejected the idea that courts have "decided the facts" on the integrity of November's presidential election.

“The courts have not decided the facts,” Paul said Wednesday during a hearing on the integrity of the 2020 election. “The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections, and they stayed out of it by finding an excuse.”

Paul pointed out while speaking with former special counsel Ken Starr that 60 court cases involving voter fraud claims in the election were thrown out for procedural reasons, which Starr agreed with, saying that the “vast majority” were thrown out for procedural reasons rather than merit.

Paul also called on state legislatures to “reaffirm” that election law can only be changed by state legislatures, and he suggested that hearings should take place in the future to listen to state legislators and make sure that is happening.

The Kentucky Republican told Starr that this legal aspect should be heard by the courts and stated that roughly two dozen states made changes to when and how ballots are counted against the will of state legislatures.

Starr said election laws were “flagrantly violated” in Pennsylvania, which President Trump’s legal team has vehemently argued, and Paul agreed with that assessment.

“The legal question there is a very easy one to decide,” Paul said. “Even as a physician, I can figure out that the secretary of state cannot create law.”

He added: “I think there is a lot of work to be done.”

Paul’s comments have been echoed by several prominent conservatives, including radio host Mark Levin, who has taken issue with the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear a legal challenge of the 2020 election that was signed by 17 states.

Levin also slammed the Supreme Court for not taking up a challenge in Pennsylvania over the constitutional question that Paul and Starr discussed in Wednesday’s hearing.

Levin called the justices on the court “fearful” of the political repercussions of hearing the case and accused them of “ducking under the proverbial table.”

Wrong again.
I'll repeat, no one has produced the evidence which would swing an election. Rand Paul produced nothing but his interpretation but still NO EVIDENCE.
Are you completely ignorant to what evidence is? You can't be that dumb but I might be wrong.

 

[pjmret]

Senator Rand Paul lists some of the reasons courts refuse to take up voter fraud cases without even examining the details.

Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out | Washington Examiner

Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out

by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor |

December 16, 2020 03:04 PM

Sen. Rand Paul rejected the idea that courts have "decided the facts" on the integrity of November's presidential election.

“The courts have not decided the facts,” Paul said Wednesday during a hearing on the integrity of the 2020 election. “The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections, and they stayed out of it by finding an excuse.”

Paul pointed out while speaking with former special counsel Ken Starr that 60 court cases involving voter fraud claims in the election were thrown out for procedural reasons, which Starr agreed with, saying that the “vast majority” were thrown out for procedural reasons rather than merit.

Paul also called on state legislatures to “reaffirm” that election law can only be changed by state legislatures, and he suggested that hearings should take place in the future to listen to state legislators and make sure that is happening.

The Kentucky Republican told Starr that this legal aspect should be heard by the courts and stated that roughly two dozen states made changes to when and how ballots are counted against the will of state legislatures.

Starr said election laws were “flagrantly violated” in Pennsylvania, which President Trump’s legal team has vehemently argued, and Paul agreed with that assessment.

“The legal question there is a very easy one to decide,” Paul said. “Even as a physician, I can figure out that the secretary of state cannot create law.”

He added: “I think there is a lot of work to be done.”

Paul’s comments have been echoed by several prominent conservatives, including radio host Mark Levin, who has taken issue with the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear a legal challenge of the 2020 election that was signed by 17 states.

Levin also slammed the Supreme Court for not taking up a challenge in Pennsylvania over the constitutional question that Paul and Starr discussed in Wednesday’s hearing.

Levin called the justices on the court “fearful” of the political repercussions of hearing the case and accused them of “ducking under the proverbial table.”

completely wrong, of course, as I posted already. Republicans presented their evidence, the courts looked at it and said it had no merit.

he's a ***** and so are you

 

[Boris Norris]

H

Democrats complain about Trump's appointments to SCOTUS. Why? Because they know republicans may also appoint biased judges just like democrats can do. Why would any judge not allow reputable forensics examiners to examine voting machines that have been called into question by millions of Americans concerned about the way democrats controlled access to the machines before, during, and after elections? Because the judge is either completely biased against Americans wanting answers, or possibly some other reason. What legitimate reason is there to hide the machines from examiners after the machines were programmed, operated, and controlled by democrat workers with little or no knowledge of forensics?


What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect - If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced - Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines (thegatewaypundit.com)

What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect – If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced – Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines
+++++++++++++++++

PA Supreme Court Blocks Inspection of Voting Machines in Fulton County (wdiy.org)

PA Supreme Court Blocks Inspection of Voting Machines in Fulton County

By Sam Dunklau | WITF

Published January 18, 2022 at 7:15 AM EST

/
Pennsylvania's Supreme Court is blocking an inspection of voting machine equipment in a heavily-Republican midstate county. WITF's Sam Dunklau has more on the development that happened just moments before it was set to begin Friday.​

Here is a direct quote from your piece.

There were no widespread issues with the 2020 election in Fulton County.

The voting machines that Republicans want to look at were decertified because another company without election experience examined those machines last year. It found nothing consequential.


Do you want to go on with this on the basis you are proving nothing?

 

[mark francis]

I didn't know that pa state supreme court = "democrats" lol.
show me how their legal reasoning was wrong and based on partisan politics.

There is no justifiable reason for democrats to be given complete control of voting machines linked to George Soros that determine the outcome of national elections.

"
Wake Technology Services, an IT firm, looked at Fulton County’s now-decertified Dominion voting machines early last year and found no evidence of voter fraud.

Perhaps the investigators did not know what they were looking for or how to find it. At any ra,te the democrat machines got busted in 2022 in an undeniable case of clear machine fraud, removing any doubt that the machines could have easily committed fraud in the 2020 election.

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes” | The Wentworth Report

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes”. By Emerald Robinson.

According to the local paper Decaturish: DeKalb County (GA) just released the results of a hand count in the District 2County Commission primary race — and the hand count revealed such massive discrepancies between the May 24th machine results and the June 1 hand count that it has flipped the race! …

The machines did not count 2,810 votes at all — mostly from Election Day ballots. That’s almost 20% of the total votes that mysteriously disappeared …

The machines also counted only 589 votes for the candidate Michelle Long Spears on May 24th and placed her third in the race but the June 1st hand count discovered 3,491 more votes for her. Suddenly, she’s winning the race. …

The real bombshell is why there was a hand count conducted at all in this race. It only happened because the candidate Michelle Long Spears took pictures of the precinct-level results and showed them to the local media site Decaturish and those machine “results” showed that Michelle Long Spears was getting zero votes in her own precinct. In other words: obvious fraud. …

New and corrupt databases created ! Mistakes in the precinct scanners! Thousands of votes not counted! Thousands of votes miscounted for multiple candidates! Hand counts conducted to correct the machine counts!

Guess what folks: it’s called election fraud using the electronic voting machines.

Are you ready for the best part of the story?

It’s a primary race for Democrats.

Paper ballots, hand counted under scrutiny by all interested parties. Until then, US election results are not credible.

Supporters of the effort have not explained how such an inspection would be carried out and have not clearly explained why one is necessary more than a year and a half after the machines were used.

Democrat crooks examining democrat sympathizers to examine democrat voting machines programmed and operated and then hidden from the public need to be reexamined, even though memory cards may have since been lost, altered, or other evidence destroyed since the 2020 election.

 

[mark francis]

prove they do have "total control", *****. lol

give some examples. duh

Republican supporters of Trump had to go to court to stop democrat operators of Dominion machines in Georgia from continuing to wipe the machines clean after the 2020 election. Who was resisting the examination of the machines? 70 million Americans? No. Trump-hating supporters of the violent leftist democrat mob were fighting and continue to fight republicans who simply want unbiased experts to examine the machines to determine if any errors occurred. Nobody should be opposed to an unbiased examination of the machines. Opposition to such transparency in elections gives the elections officials the appearance that they are trying to hide the machines from the American people for reasons they cannot adequately justify.

Judge freezes voting machines in 3 Georgia counties - POLITICO

Judge freezes voting machines in 3 Georgia counties
The suit is one of two cases filed in federal courts last week by Sidney Powell, an outspoken Texas attorney.

A Georgia Republican Party poll watcher looks over voting machine transporters being stored at the Fulton County Election Preparation Center on Nov. 4, 2020, in Atlanta. | Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

By JOSH GERSTEIN
11/30/2020 08:20 AM EST
Updated: 11/30/2020 04:15 PM EST

A judge assigned to a Republican-led lawsuit alleging widespread fraud in the presidential election in Georgia issued an order late Sunday night blocking plans to wipe or reset voting machines used in three counties in the state.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Batten Sr. revealed in his four-page directive that he held a hearing via Zoom Sunday evening on the suit — one of two cases filed in federal courts last week by Sidney Powell, an outspoken Texas attorney who joined President Donald Trump’s legal team earlier this month only to be dismissed from it a few days later.

The hearing was not announced on the court’s docket and appears not to have been open to the press or public. It seems to have focused on claims that the election results in Georgia were wildly inaccurate due to use of machines from a leading vendor of voting equipment — Dominion Election Systems.

Powell has alleged, based on scant evidence, that the firm’s foreign ties allowed hostile governments to meddle in the U.S. election via a conspiracy that involved both Democratic and Republican U.S. officials.

While many Democratic and some Republican officials have dismissed Powell’s claims as a fantasy, some GOP leaders are also warning that the effort to stoke doubt about the just-completed election could depress Republican turnout in a pair of runoff elections set for Jan. 5 in Georgia that could determine whether the GOP or Democrats control the U.S. Senate for the next two years.

Batten’s temporary restraining order issued after 10 p.m. Sunday applies to Dominion voting machines in Cobb and Gwinett counties, which favored President-elect Joe Biden, as well as smaller Cherokee County, which favored Trump.

“Defendants are hereby enjoined and restrained from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any Dominion voting machine in Cobb, Gwinnett, and Cherokee Counties,” wrote Batten, an appointee of President George W. Bush.

According to Batten, counsel for the defendants in the suit — Gov. Brian Kemp (R-Ga.), Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and four other members of the Georgia Elections Board — argued that the court had no jurisdiction over the counties because they are not parties to the case. The defendants also argued that allowing experts working for plaintiffs to inspect the machines “would pose substantial security and proprietary/trade secret risks,” Batten’s order says.

The judge agreed to receive a brief by Wednesday afternoon from Kemp and Raffensperger detailing the reasons why they oppose allowing Powell’s team to conduct “forensic inspections” of the machines in the three counties.

In his order, Batten granted another request from the GOP plaintiffs, ordering the state to “promptly” provide the challengers with a copy of the state’s contract with Dominion.

In another development Monday morning, Batten certified his temporary restraining order for appeal, meaning that the state officials who are defendants in the case or perhaps even the counties affected could immediately appeal it to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

A spokesperson for Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, whose office has defended Kemp and Raffensperger in election litigation, said early Monday she could not comment on the case beyond the court filings.

Batten’s nighttime order came after confusion earlier Sunday when one of Powell’s co-counsels, Georgia attorney Lin Wood, posted on the internet what he described as two other orders issued by the judge.

In those directives, Batten initially appeared to impose a statewide ban on clearing voting machines, then said he couldn’t do that because of the issue about the counties not being named as defendants in the suit.

Those orders also appeared to set an in-person hearing on the case for Friday in Atlanta. However, there’s no mention of such a hearing in Batten’s order issued Sunday night.

In addition, the orders Wood posted on the web were never entered in the court’s public docket. A person familiar with the case told POLITICO Sunday that they were drafts, although they bore the judge’s signature.

As he posted the initial documents online, Wood reacted skeptically to what he described as the judge’s reversal.

“What???” Wood asked on Twitter. “Machines are owned by State & @GaSecofState administers state laws on elections. Why are GA officials determined to wipe these machines clean….Your guess is as good as mine.”

 

[mark francis]

the courts were involved. they heard cases and rejected the evidence. duh. that's what courts do, *****. lol

god you're stupid. lol

The courts either took on the cases or they did not. I am unaware of court decisions rendered after voting cases were tried in a courtroom in which the judge's opinion was that evidence proved no voter fraud occurred.