Navarro's blistering 36-page report alleging Biden's outright voter fraud

[mark francis]

courts took up the issue. duh they ruled against it because they didn't see credible evidence.
btw courts don't PROVE something, that's not how courts work, nimrod. Its the job of the plaintiff to PROVE they are right. duh and republican morons failed spectacularly!

here's one example: "
A Maricopa County Superior Court judge denied Friday a Republican-backed request to nullify Arizona’s election results and grant President Donald Trump, who lost in the official vote count, the state’s 11 electoral college votes.

President-elect Joe Biden won the election in Arizona by about 10,500 votes.

Judge Randall Warner said there is neither evidence of fraud, misconduct, an erroneous vote count nor illegal votes in the 2020 election results in Maricopa County.

Democrats have not proved they committed massive voter fraud in Arizona in 2020 no matter how many of their supporters and other members of society claim without proof that they committed no fraud.

 

[mark francis]

A months-long Republican investigation into Michigan’s 2020 election uncovered no evidence of widespread fraud and concluded Wednesday with a recommendation the attorney general investigate those who made false claims for "personal gain."

The 35-page report prepared by Sen. Ed McBroom, R-Vulcan, dives deep to debunk conspiracy theories perpetuated by former President Donald Trump and some of his supporters in the wake of the Michigan election, which Democratic President Joe Biden won by 154,188 votes.


A Michigan judge has denied a petition to block the certification of the 2020 election results in the heavily Democratic county that is home to Detroit, another legal setback for the Trump campaign, which has similar cases in several states.

The Michigan lawsuit, brought by two Republican poll challengers who leveled unfounded allegations of fraud -- not the campaign itself -- had also sought an independent audit of the election, which the judge also rejected.

The campaign did, however, attach this entire lawsuit as evidence of fraud in its own lawsuit filed in the state this week. It is not clear how this will affect their case, which a judge has yet to hear.

Chief Judge Timothy M. Kenny described the plaintiff’s "interpretation" of events on Election Day as "incorrect and not credible."

There is credible evidence that thousands of democrat supporters and others do get on board the bandwagon with those who claim democrats did not commit fraud. But democrats will not allow investigators to examine voting machines and paper ballots that seem to clearly show evidence of fraud. Democrats give the impression by their obstruction of investigations that they are trying to hide evidence of fraud, even if fraud really does not exist. Until forensics experts properly examine all the evidence, especially the voting machines democrats are so desperate to keep locked away from them, the issue of fraud will never be disproven.

 

[mark francis]

A Wisconsin judge said Thursday that a Republican-ordered, taxpayer-funded investigation into the 2020 election found “absolutely no evidence of election fraud,” but did reveal contempt for the state’s open records law by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and a former state Supreme Court justice he hired.

A highly anticipated nonpartisan audit of the 2020 presidential election in Wisconsin released Friday did not identify any widespread fraud in the battleground state, which a key Republican legislative leader said shows its elections are “safe and secure.”

Conservative Justice Brian Hagendorn, in the court’s ruling, called the campaign’s challenge to one category of ballots involving indefinitely confined “meritless on its face,” while other challenges were brought too late.
In a concurring opinion, Justices Rebecca Frank Dallet and Jill J. Karofsky, noted that “nothing could be further from the truth” than Trump’s claims of voter fraud in Wisconsin, and they affirmed the lower court ruling that “found no evidence of any fraud.”

Democrat politicians, lawyers, judges, and reporters, and others support the unproven claims by democrats committed no fraud. Ruling that no evidence of fraud exists while simultaneously admitting that democrats continue to refuse to allow their party voting machines to be examined by independent forensics experts to prove they were not tampered with in the election, is a faulty ruling.

 

[pjmret]

Democrat politicians, lawyers, judges, and reporters, and others support the unproven claims by democrats committed no fraud. Ruling that no evidence of fraud exists while simultaneously admitting that democrats continue to refuse to allow their party voting machines to be examined by independent forensics experts to prove they were not tampered with in the election, is a faulty ruling.

the judge didn't "admit that democrats continue to refuse to allow their party voting machines blah blah blah". the judge said the republicans presented no credible evidence of fraud. duh

*****, voting machines aren't owned by a party. god you're stupid. lol

the NON PARTISAN audit said "no fraud', *****. No one obstructed anything.
god you're stupid

 

[pjmret]

There is credible evidence that thousands of democrat supporters and others do get on board the bandwagon with those who claim democrats did not commit fraud. But democrats will not allow investigators to examine voting machines and paper ballots that seem to clearly show evidence of fraud. Democrats give the impression by their obstruction of investigations that they are trying to hide evidence of fraud, even if fraud really does not exist. Until forensics experts properly examine all the evidence, especially the voting machines democrats are so desperate to keep locked away from them, the issue of fraud will never be disproven.

again, i asked you already and you cowardly refused to answer, which "democrats" are not "allowing investigators to examine voting machines'. be specific.

you know states all have audits and such, right, *****. Arizona had a forensic audit for example: "

AUDIT RESULTS​

Maricopa County’s election equipment and software passed all tests performed by two independent firms hired to conduct the forensic audit, according to reports by two federally certified Voting System Testing Laboratories.'

you're so stupid

 

[pjmret]

Democrats have not proved they committed massive voter fraud in Arizona in 2020 no matter how many of their supporters and other members of society claim without proof that they committed no fraud.

you're right, democrats have no proved they committed massive voter fraud, because they..didn't. lol.
as the audits have proven. duh.

proof is required by the person making the claim of fraud, *****.
god you're stupid

 

[pjmret]

The evidence has been flatly rejected by democrats and leftists who claim no fraud took place in spite of what the evidence shows. Democrats do not prove the ballots were legitimate, they just rely on counters to claim without proof that the votes were legitimate. Democrats also totally control access to voting machines that recorded anomalies and will not allow investigators not approved by the democrat party to examine the machines. That sort of monopolistic control of national voting equipment by one party, particularly the political party that sponsored widespread violence and destruction in the 2020 riots, that is under suspicion of having committed voter fraud should not be allowed.

and rejected by courts too. lol.
because its not credible.

democrats totally control access to voting machines..even in red states?
hahahahah
hahahahah

 

[Boris Norris]

The evidence has been flatly rejected by democrats and leftists who claim no fraud took place in spite of what the evidence shows.

WHAT EVIDENCE? Thats the point. None of you have produced anything or it would be been over turned.

Democrats do not prove the ballots were legitimate, they just rely on counters to claim without proof that the votes were legitimate.

Democrats do not have to prove their legitimacy. The electoral people do that. On a pro rata basis approximately half the counters would be republican. Are you suggesting they cheated the system and did nothing while Democrats committed fraud in front of them?
Grow up you fool.

Democrats also totally control access to voting machines that recorded anomalies

You are a liar. The machines are controlled by the electoral people. You know nothing. The machines were checked by a gop funded audit and found to be working correctly.
Youre not big on research boy.

and will not allow investigators not approved by the democrat party to examine the machines.

read above you idiot.

That sort of monopolistic control of national voting equipment by one party,

Youre paranoid and have no evidence. Your probably mentally unstable also.

particularly the political party that sponsored widespread violence and destruction in the 2020 riots,

Democrats did not sponsor blm and you have no evidence of that blatant ignorant hate filled lie.

that is under suspicion of having committed voter fraud should not be allowed.

Suspicion by opponents is normal. It is evidence, which you haven't produced, is needed for a conviction.

You should settle down and speak to your mother about your condition. Alternatively, get the evidence which proves your point and I will take it to the police for you. Trump has already advertised he would do the same and pay for it but you must have missed that.

 

[Boris Norris]

Courts refused to take up the hot potato issue of voter fraud for multiple reasons, not one of which was because courts proved for a fact that no fraud was committed.

Name the reasons. Ill wait here. Take your time. I'll bet you can't.

 

[mark francis]

the judge didn't "admit that democrats continue to refuse to allow their party voting machines blah blah blah". the judge said the republicans presented no credible evidence of fraud. duh

*****, voting machines aren't owned by a party. god you're stupid. lol

the NON PARTISAN audit said "no fraud', *****. No one obstructed anything.
god you're stupid

Are you saying the judge ruled there was no evidence of fraud without realizing the democrats were still refusing to allow unbiased investigators to examine the voting computers that belonged to the American people and that the democrats had no right to totally control access to?

 

[mark francis]

again, i asked you already and you cowardly refused to answer, which "democrats" are not "allowing investigators to examine voting machines'. be specific.

you know states all have audits and such, right, *****. Arizona had a forensic audit for example: "

AUDIT RESULTS​

Maricopa County’s election equipment and software passed all tests performed by two independent firms hired to conduct the forensic audit, according to reports by two federally certified Voting System Testing Laboratories.'

you're so stupid

What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect - If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced - Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines (thegatewaypundit.com)

What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect – If Investigators Touch Them They WIll Need to Be Replaced – Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines

 

[mark francis]

you're right, democrats have no proved they committed massive voter fraud, because they..didn't. lol.
as the audits have proven. duh.

proof is required by the person making the claim of fraud, *****.
god you're stupid

Democrats claim but do not prove ballots that have not been verified as valid must be accepted as valid without examination by unbiased examiners.

 

[mark francis]

and rejected by courts too. lol.
because its not credible.

democrats totally control access to voting machines..even in red states?
hahahahah
hahahahah

I don't know of any public officials except for democrats who are refusing to allow forensics examiners to examine the voting machines for possible fraud

 

[pjmret]

I don't know of any public officials except for democrats who are refusing to allow forensics examiners to examine the voting machines for possible fraud

again, list the democrats who are doing this.
i keep asking, you keep posting vague rightwing stupidity

 

[pjmret]

Democrats claim but do not prove ballots that have not been verified as valid must be accepted as valid without examination by unbiased examiners.

actually states certified the election results. that's called the "election process", *****. lol