You might be a ***** if

[mark francis]

We are talking about moons distance and rate of recession which there is no reason it would be uniform over time duh

Has the earth slowed down in its orbit around the sun or has earth's rate of rotation changed from time to time? We don't think so but if we wish to postulate that the moon's movements changed over time then why would we insist the earth's movements have remained constant or that changes in its movement have been consistent and can be predicted with accuracy because of that assumed consistency?

Evolutionists don't prove evolution, they just keep dishonestly or stupidly claiming it has been proven by others who they claim can prove it even if they themselves cannot.

 

[pjmret]

Only an idiot imagines he can date rocks to be millions of years old simply by making certain unproven assumptions in the engineered dating system he designs to spit out the results he wants.

you dont believe in physics? lol.

did you want to admit that saying that the rate of moon's recession had no reason to be uniform over a long period of time, or should I just call you a ***** for saying that again? lol

 

[mark francis]

you dont believe in physics? lol.

did you want to admit that saying that the rate of moon's recession had no reason to be uniform over a long period of time, or should I just call you a ***** for saying that again? lol

I believe in physics, not in new quantum 'science' make believe postulations that defy the laws of physics.

 

[pjmret]

Has the earth slowed down in its orbit around the sun or has earth's rate of rotation changed from time to time? We don't think so but if we wish to postulate that the moon's movements changed over time then why would we insist the earth's movements have remained constant or that changes in its movement have been consistent and can be predicted with accuracy because of that assumed consistency?

Evolutionists don't prove evolution, they just keep dishonestly or stupidly claiming it has been proven by others who they claim can prove it even if they themselves cannot.

you really dont understand anything lol.

the tidal force is pushing the moon away, and that force depends on a number of factors, such as the distribution of land and the amount of water vs ice. these have clearly changed over time, so the tidal force would have also. duh

creationists "proving" something by ASSuming the rate of recession is uniform just prove that they are science morons lol

 

[pjmret]

I believe in physics, not in new quantum 'science' make believe postulations that defy the laws of physics.

so radioactive decay isn't physics? lol.
you are a science *****.

 

[pjmret]

Has the earth slowed down in its orbit around the sun or has earth's rate of rotation changed from time to time? We don't think so but if we wish to postulate that the moon's movements changed over time then why would we insist the earth's movements have remained constant or that changes in its movement have been consistent and can be predicted with accuracy because of that assumed consistency?

Evolutionists don't prove evolution, they just keep dishonestly or stupidly claiming it has been proven by others who they claim can prove it even if they themselves cannot.

evolution? we're talking about the moon's recession rate, *****.

you morons always try to deflect when I make you look stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

you really dont understand anything lol.

the tidal force is pushing the moon away, and that force depends on a number of factors, such as the distribution of land and the amount of water vs ice. these have clearly changed over time, so the tidal force would have also. duh

creationists "proving" something by ASSuming the rate of recession is uniform just prove that they are science morons lol

Of course evolutionists must move the goalposts whenever new science discoveries falsify old pseudoscience evolutionists beliefs.

 

[pjmret]

Of course evolutionists must move the goalposts whenever new science discoveries falsify old pseudoscience evolutionists beliefs.

no goalposts were moved, *****. lol.

its science morons like you who make stupid posts like how the rate of recession is uniform over time. lol.
as if the earth doesn't change over time.

god you are such a science *****. lol

 

[mark francis]

so radioactive decay isn't physics? lol.
you are a science *****.

No, radioactive decay is not a violation of the laws of science but the idea that original life on earth sprang from some unknown and unknowable simple life form of some indescribable sort whose existence cannot be scientifically explained is a violation of scientific laws and principles.

 

[pjmret]

Of course evolutionists must move the goalposts whenever new science discoveries falsify old pseudoscience evolutionists beliefs.

why do you keep talking about evolution, *****?
this is physics and geology. duh.

god you post the dumbest things lol

 

[pjmret]

No, radioactive decay is not a violation of the laws of science but the idea that original life on earth sprang from some unknown and unknowable simple life form of some indescribable sort whose existence cannot be scientifically explained is a violation of scientific laws and principles.

why are you talking about origins of life now?
oh because i've made you look stupid on the moon recession. lol

 

[mark francis]

evolution? we're talking about the moon's recession rate, *****.

you morons always try to deflect when I make you look stupid. lol

Nicolas Steno was one of the first secularists to go off the rails with his assumptions about superimposition, which were flawed then and remain flawed today.

Nicolas Steno - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

1. the law of superposition: "At the time when a given stratum was being formed, there was beneath it another substance which prevented the further descent of the comminuted matter and so at the time when the lowest stratum was being formed either another solid substance was beneath it, or if some fluid existed there, then it was not only of a different character from the upper fluid, but also heavier than the solid sediment of the upper fluid."

Steno's erroneous assumptions laid the groundwork for nearly all erroneous old earth dating methods today. Fossils are not formed by mud deposits in shallow water bodies collecting dead animal remains and holding them while the mud hardens before a new shallow sea develops to capture more recent animal remains. The theory has been debunked but committed secularists and evolutionists still tightly cling to its foolish ideas like a life preserver in the middle of a deep ocean hurricane.

 

[pjmret]

Nicolas Steno was one of the first secularists to go off the rails with his assumptions about superimposition, which were flawed then and remain flawed today.

Nicolas Steno - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

1. the law of superposition: "At the time when a given stratum was being formed, there was beneath it another substance which prevented the further descent of the comminuted matter and so at the time when the lowest stratum was being formed either another solid substance was beneath it, or if some fluid existed there, then it was not only of a different character from the upper fluid, but also heavier than the solid sediment of the upper fluid."

Steno's erroneous assumptions laid the groundwork for nearly all erroneous old earth dating methods today. Fossils are not formed by mud deposits in shallow water bodies collecting dead animal remains and holding them while the mud hardens before a new shallow sea develops to capture more recent animal remains. The theory has been debunked but committed secularists and evolutionists still tightly cling to its foolish ideas like a life preserver in the middle of a deep ocean hurricane.

who is talking about superposition?
oh wait, you're just trying to deflect from the fact that I made you look stupid about moon recession. lol

 

[mark francis]

no goalposts were moved, *****. lol.

its science morons like you who make stupid posts like how the rate of recession is uniform over time. lol.
as if the earth doesn't change over time.

god you are such a science *****. lol

The rate of the earth's rotation deceleration is also a factor. How do you explain the current rate of earth's rotation in light of secularists assumptions of billions of years old universe? Are you also speculating that the earth changed rotation speed over the years and if so, where do you find scientific support for such wild assumptions?

 

[pjmret]

The rate of the earth's rotation deceleration is also a factor. How do you explain the current rate of earth's rotation in light of secularists assumptions of billions of years old universe? Are you also speculating that the earth changed rotation speed over the years and if so, where do you find scientific support for such wild assumptions?

feel free to show how the earth is only 6000 years old using correct scientific principles.
morons like you talking about a uniform rate of recession are a joke.