YES, It's about time

cashmcall

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
1,594
Whether this weekend finds you blowing two feet of snow off the driveway or counting the hours until "Downton Abbey," make time to watch the video of Dr. Ben Carson speaking to the White House prayer breakfast this week.
Seated in view to his right are Senator Jeff Sessions and President Obama. One doesn't look happy. You know something's coming when Dr. Carson says, "It's not my intention to offend anyone. But it's hard not to. The PC police are out in force everywhere."
Dr. Carson tossed over the PC police years ago. Raised by a single mother in inner-city Detroit, he was as he tells it "a horrible student with a horrible temper." Today he's director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins and probably the most renowned specialist in his field.
Late in his talk he dropped two very un-PC ideas. The first is an unusual case for a flat tax: "What we need to do is come up with something simple. And when I pick up my Bible, you know what I see? I see the fairest individual in the universe, God, and he's given us a system. It's called a tithe.
"We don't necessarily have to do 10% but it's the principle. He didn't say if your crops fail, don't give me any tithe or if you have a bumper crop, give me triple tithe. So there must be something inherently fair about proportionality. You make $10 billion, you put in a billion. You make $10 you put in one. Of course you've got to get rid of the loopholes. Some people say, 'Well that's not fair because it doesn't hurt the guy who made $10 billion as much as the guy who made 10.' Where does it say you've got to hurt the guy? He just put a billion dollars in the pot. We don't need to hurt him. It's that kind of thinking that has resulted in 602 banks in the Cayman Islands. That money needs to be back here building our infrastructure and creating jobs."
Not surprisingly, a practicing physician has un-PC thoughts on health care:
"Here's my solution: When a person is born, give him a birth certificate, an electronic medical record, and a health savings account to which money can be contributed—pretax—from the time you're born 'til the time you die. If you die, you can pass it on to your family members, and there's nobody talking about death panels. We can make contributions for people who are indigent. Instead of sending all this money to some bureaucracy, let's put it in their HSAs. Now they have some control over their own health care. And very quickly they're going to learn how to be responsible."
The Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon may not be politically correct, but he's closer to correct than we've heard in years.
A version of this article appeared February 9, 2013, on page A12 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Ben Carson for President.
 
Werbung:
I just heard him on F&F. He would be a breath of fresh air. He's also a resigtered Independent. He said he isn't political and if there was a party called the "Logic Party" that he would be a member of that.

He also said that; "we now have a fourth branch of government called the "Special Interest Group", and that "we need to get back to a government that is of, by and for the people. We need some brave people to stand up to a system that's entrenched in corruption. Every great nation before it's fall has tolerated corruption, we have to deal with this".

He gets it.....:)
 
I had never stopped to consider that the tithe was a flat tax. Some good points on that.

Individual HSA's to which others can contribute. Interesting.
 
interesting...if your well off....Once again the poor can go die.

No one said that want the poor to go die. No one even implied it. So often you say things like that it it seems like you are living on a different planet. Really, I have no idea where you are getting this. Nothing on this thread would make for a world in which the poor go to die. Dr. Carson even said that we would make contributions for the indigent. They would be helped in a whole new way. Would they still get public aid? No one said they would not. So if you think someone here is talking about eliminating public aid you are just making it up.

You have made this response before, it has been denied and refuted yet you continue to make it yet again.

It has come to the point where I can only conclude that you are either saying this as a matter of strategy (a lying strategy) or you are delusional (perhaps you read too many lefty sources and you think words have different meanings than they really have). If you are not lying or delsuional then please show us where someone here said they want that outcome or that that outcome would result.
 
No one said that want the poor to go die. No one even implied it. So often you say things like that it it seems like you are living on a different planet. Really, I have no idea where you are getting this. Nothing on this thread would make for a world in which the poor go to die. Dr. Carson even said that we would make contributions for the indigent. They would be helped in a whole new way. Would they still get public aid? No one said they would not. So if you think someone here is talking about eliminating public aid you are just making it up.

You have made this response before, it has been denied and refuted yet you continue to make it yet again.

It has come to the point where I can only conclude that you are either saying this as a matter of strategy (a lying strategy) or you are delusional (perhaps you read too many lefty sources and you think words have different meanings than they really have). If you are not lying or delsuional then please show us where someone here said they want that outcome or that that outcome would result.

Pockets, like Big Ears, is an expert at the use of the strawman argument.
 
If you are not lying or delsuional then please show us where someone here said they want that outcome or that that outcome would result.

It's just like the race thing. If your a Republican/conservative your a racist, rich, war monger and want the poor to die.
 
Pockets, like Big Ears, is an expert at the use of the strawman argument.

Ok, Pocketfullofshells, its been six days now and you have not come back to defend your original statement. Could it mean that you know and know all along that it was wrong?
 
Ok, Pocketfullofshells, its been six days now and you have not come back to defend your original statement. Could it mean that you know and know all along that it was wrong?

or could It be I was working 13 hour days and had other shit to do? And you don't have to say let the poor die...you just support stupid ass plans that don't fix the problem and would let them die...and don't give shit. YOu just don't have the balls to say you don't care if they die.
 
or could It be I was working 13 hour days and had other shit to do? And you don't have to say let the poor die...you just support stupid ass plans that don't fix the problem and would let them die...and don't give shit. YOu just don't have the balls to say you don't care if they die.

Apparently the massive welfare state, currently bankrupting the nation, must be maintained and increased says leftists like Pockets. And anyone who offers solutions or desires to make the system more effective, naturally hates the poor and wants them all to die.

The simple minds of leftists.

They care deeply about the poor. Not so much about the unborn. :confused:

The ironic thing is if we leave welfare unchanged, as leftists like Pockets demands, the nation will go bankrupt (in reality already is) and the poor will suffer the most when it all comes crashing down. Sadly leftists can't rationalize the consequences of their actions.
 
or could It be I was working 13 hour days and had other shit to do? And you don't have to say let the poor die...you just support stupid ass plans that don't fix the problem and would let them die...and don't give shit. YOu just don't have the balls to say you don't care if they die.
I didn't know what to do when I liked part of a post but the rest was just ranting....SO this is the part I liked.."or could It be I was working 13 hour days and had other shit to do?"
 
Apparently the massive welfare state, currently bankrupting the nation, must be maintained and increased says leftists like Pockets. And anyone who offers solutions or desires to make the system more effective, naturally hates the poor and wants them all to die.

The simple minds of leftists.

They care deeply about the poor. Not so much about the unborn. :confused:

The ironic thing is if we leave welfare unchanged, as leftists like Pockets demands, the nation will go bankrupt (in reality already is) and the poor will suffer the most when it all comes crashing down. Sadly leftists can't rationalize the consequences of their actions.

Weird! WHAT 'MASSIVE WELFARE STATE'? Where do you live, Mars? What is the 'Nation' - the rich thieves? Without the people they thieve from they wouldn't be rich, man. Fat lot you care about the BORN kid - you lock 'em up in vast numbers and kill 'em like flies to keep your crazy bang-bangs and your spoils.
 
Werbung:
What is the 'Nation' - the rich thieves? Without the people they thieve from they wouldn't be rich, man.


Wacko leftist talking points parroted like a true sheeple. Obviously with no capacity to think for one self.

Fat lot you care about the BORN kid - you lock 'em up in vast numbers and kill 'em like flies to keep your crazy bang-bangs and your spoils.

This comment is clearly bordering on insanity ......

Where do you live, Mars?

Obviously my liberal friend .....
It is you who are much further out of touch than Mars ....
 
Back
Top