Lagboltz
Well-Known Member
Perhaps you can tell me why Bush and his administration intentionally lied about WMD's in Iraq and squandered a trillion dollars and thousands of American lives for a corrupt regime.
every independant examination of your disproved your allegations. Repeating a lie does not render it true.Perhaps you can tell me why Bush and his administration intentionally lied about WMD's in Iraq and squandered a trillion dollars and thousands of American lives for a corrupt regime.
This summarizes the lies of the Bush administration.every independant examination of your disproved your allegations. Repeating a lie does not render it true.
Perhaps you can tell me why Bush and his administration intentionally lied about WMD's in Iraq and squandered a trillion dollars and thousands of American lives for a corrupt regime.
It's not a deflection. Your assumption and dogtowner's statement is that corruption during Obama's administration is more common than any other administration. I think you are both very wrong, and I gave a common example of Bush's corruption.Nice deflection --- don't answer the question. We'll just mark that down as non-responsive.
It's not a deflection. Your assumption and dogtowner's statement is that corruption during Obama's administration is more common than any other administration. I think you are both very wrong, and I gave a common example of Bush's corruption.
As far as your list of items in post #15, the Bush administration was guilty of almost all of them. All you have to do is search the web and you will find many examples. That is your homework assignment. All previous administrations also had their own assortment of corruptions.
Au contraire. Let me say it again. Your assumption and dogtowner's statement is that corruption during Obama's administration is more common than any other administration. I think you are both very wrong, and I gave many examples of Bush's corruption to illustrate my point.You are attempting to deflect from the issue - Obama's criminal activities - by pointing to someone else's.
Frankly, you being to sound like a typical elementary school playground - "He did it FIRST" - as if that's supposed to be some justification.
Au contraire. Let me say it again. Your assumption and dogtowner's statement is that corruption during Obama's administration is more common than any other administration. I think you are both very wrong, and I gave many examples of Bush's corruption to illustrate my point.
The Siena College Research Institute conducts a yearly survey of presidential personal attributes. They are based on responses from 238 presidential scholars. Harding and Nixon have the lowest in integrity, which immediately makes my point. Overall personal attributes are listed from best to worst as:
B. Obama (15)
...
GW Bush (39)
Pierce (40)
Harding (41)
Buchanan(42)
A. Johnson (43)
Those 238 scholars totally disagree with your gut feelings about Obama. Note that GW Bush makes the worst 5 list.
Those scholars have much more credibility than your "thruthiness". Frankly, you are the one sounding like a petulant elementary school playground kid. You make sweeping statements without any background justification and start whining at me when I furnish counterexamples of your gut feeling.
That game is what I addressed. But now you want to start a new one. Your new game would be much more objective if your closing sentence was,... I think this administration is orders of magnitude more corrupt than any in recent history.
You don't need to. You simply post a new thread at this HOP site.You can be assured that I do not keep a chalkboard in my bedroom marking down each and every time the Obama administration screws up.
That's what SCOTUS is for. Do you have something else in mind?So ... back to the real issue. What are we to do about the gross violations of Constitutional authority by this [and any future (added by Lagboltz)] President?
Of course this is a silly game, but you set the rules when you said,
That game is what I addressed. But now you want to start a new one. Your new game would be much more objective if your closing sentence was,
"What are we to do about the gross violations of Constitutional authority by any President?"
I think any past, present or future president has always, and will always, continue to stretch the executive power. That's the nature of pols.
You don't need to. You simply post a new thread at this HOP site.
That's what SCOTUS is for. Do you have something else in mind?
Not a deflection. Your title of this thread refers to past administrations by comparing them all to the present.Actually, my comments were in response to your deflection. But, hey, taking responsibility was NEVER your strong suit ...
I can't fix past presidents, but we damn sure can do something about current ones. As for SCOTUS, 0-13 for the current criminal-in-residence. You know any other president that has that kind of record?
So, I leave it to you -- what are YOU going to do about it?
Not a deflection. Your title of this thread refers to past administrations by comparing them all to the present.
As far as doing something about it, why leave it to me. I leave it to YOU, as a conservative who feels more in need of addressing liberal policies right now than me. Right now Obama is more troubling to republicans than democrats. Are you refusing to address it any further because there is no other option?
What I will do in the future is not vote a third term for Obama. I will vote for Hillary rather than Rick Perry.