What Do Americans Think of Socialist Policies?

[pjmret]

Judges have no credible authority to claim massive voter fraud did not occur in the US if they cannot provide irrefutable evidence from credible investigators to back up such a claim.

they don't claim that *****.
they claim, as per their job, that evidence of fraud was not credible.

i'm willing to make you look stupid as often as you are stupid.
deal?

 

[mark francis]

no, because no one can "hide" voting machines, they are owned by governments.

Then why were Trump's appointed government investigators arrested for seeking to examine questionable government-owned voting machines in Georgia that had been brought to their attention by an election official there?

 

[pjmret]

Then why were Trump's appointed government investigators arrested for seeking to examine questionable government-owned voting machines in Georgia that had been brought to their attention by an election official there?

as i've already explained, there are laws governing access to voting machines, and they broke them. duh.
you can't just demand to see voting machines and do an investigation without authorization, *****.
its called "chain of custody", *****. lol
god you're stupid.

 

[mark francis]

they don't claim that *****.
they claim, as per their job, that evidence of fraud was not credible.

i'm willing to make you look stupid as often as you are stupid.
deal?

They did no investigation, essentially proving they saw nothing they should have seen, so their ruling can only be taken superficially to have relevance t in a very limited range of applications.

 

[pjmret]

They did no investigation, essentially proving they saw nothing they should have seen, so their ruling can only be taken superficially to have relevance t in a very limited range of applications.

yes its "limited" to the evidence provided, *****.
that's how judges work
god you're stupid lol

 

[mark francis]

as i've already explained, there are laws governing access to voting machines, and they broke them. duh.
you can't just demand to see voting machines and do an investigation without authorization, *****.
its called "chain of custody", *****. lol
god you're stupid.

If the government owns the machines, then why is Dominion allowed to bar any government official from examining questionable machines under the threat of arrest and imprisonment?

 

[pjmret]

If the government owns the machines, then why is Dominion allowed to bar any government official from examining questionable machines under the threat of arrest and imprisonment?

they aren't. machines get examined all the time, *****. arizona did it for example.

 

[mark francis]

yes its "limited" to the evidence provided, *****.
that's how judges work
god you're stupid lol

Of course no judge can rule on the massive extent of illegals voting in the US if he has only seen a small analysis of voters' names crosschecked against a list of illegal aliens associated with just one or two precincts, especially if the list of ineligible illegals is not available to investigators for reasons not related to voting security.

 

[mark francis]

they aren't. machines get examined all the time, *****. arizona did it for example.

Arizona was forced by court order to allow their machines to be examined and the investigators found all sort of problems easisly attributable to fraud. But Arizona officials are not allowing investigators to examine their machines now. How else are they going to protect the evil practice of machine voter fraud in the future?

 

[pjmret]

Arizona was forced by court order to allow their machines to be examined and the investigators found all sort of problems easisly attributable to fraud. But Arizona officials are not allowing investigators to examine their machines now. How else are they going to protect the evil practice of machine voter fraud in the future?

what "all sorts of problems" did they find that were "attributable to fraud" *****?
list them.
and what did judges think of the evidence? was it credible?

who are these "investigators"? what are their qualifications? are they following the law? did they ask a judge to let them examine machines?

 

[mark francis]

they don't claim that *****.
they claim, as per their job, that evidence of fraud was not credible.

i'm willing to make you look stupid as often as you are stupid.
deal?

What does that mean if the judge is not saying he investigated the evidence and discovered that no fraud occurred? If he did not thoroughly investigate the evidence, then whatever he said it does not mean he clearly saw proof that no voter fraud occurred.

 

[mark francis]

as i've already explained, there are laws governing access to voting machines, and they broke them. duh.
you can't just demand to see voting machines and do an investigation without authorization, *****.
its called "chain of custody", *****. lol
god you're stupid.

The government has laws that makes it illegal for a President or his investigators to examine machines the election official claimed were corrupted? What kind of stupid law is that?

 

[pjmret]

The government has laws that makes it illegal for a President or his investigators to examine machines the election official claimed were corrupted? What kind of stupid law is that?

its a law that maintains chain of custody of voting machines, so not anyone can just go in and do anything they want.
oteherwise i could go down and corrupt the software anytime i wanted. duh
what kind of stupid ***** are you? lol

if you have credible evidence of a problem, there are procedures to follow. duh.
you can't just decide to do whatever you want because your guy lost and you think laws dont apply to you

 

[mark francis]

its a law that maintains chain of custody of voting machines, so not anyone can just go in and do anything they want.
oteherwise i could go down and corrupt the software anytime i wanted. duh
what kind of stupid ***** are you? lol

if you have credible evidence of a problem, there are procedures to follow. duh.
you can't just decide to do whatever you want because your guy lost and you think laws dont apply to you

Democrats violated chain of custody rules for thousands of ballots in 2020 and falsely claim the same laws they broke now prevent anyone they disapprove of from examining their suspect voting machines. Democrats lie as well as cheat, loot, torch, and kill.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats violated chain of custody rules for thousands of ballots in 2020 and falsely claim the same laws they broke now prevent anyone they disapprove of from examining their suspect voting machines. Democrats lie as well as cheat, loot, torch, and kill.

Ballots aren't machines *****
Different laws apply duh