What Do Americans Think of Socialist Policies?

[pjmret]

It's too late to prove voting machines were not corrupted, after years have gone by allowing leftist crooks ample time to erase evidence from the machines.

Judge orders Georgia officials not to 'erase' data from Dominion voting machines in 3 counties - TheBlaze

You keep posting that same link as if it proves something
You illustrate my point perfectly
You morons can't be convinced so there is no point wasting money on trying to do so

 

[mark francis]

There's no evidence of it so in my opinion he didn't.
If you have the evidence produce it.

Where exactly is the heavens? Science has never been able to detect it but you should be able to reveal that considering you know everything else.

You can believe a godless big bang by faith but I believe by faith that God created the universe.

 

[mark francis]

You keep posting that same link as if it proves something
You illustrate my point perfectly
You morons can't be convinced so there is no point wasting money on trying to do so

Democrats lost an opportunity to prove their machines were not used to generate fake votes for Biden but since they refused to allow experts to examine the machines until weeks or months after the election, they can no longer prove the machines were not corrupted.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats lost an opportunity to prove their machines were not used to generate fake votes for Biden but since they refused to allow experts to examine the machines until weeks or months after the election, they can no longer prove the machines were not corrupted.

No Arizona did a forensic audit you morons didn't care
Yo morons are too stupid and hateful to convince
You will always find stupid excuses to ignore reality

 

[Lagboltz]

No, I do not believe Hillary eats babies. Your mention of that is the first I have ever heard that.

I do, however, believe the Clintons have been involved with crime and corruption for decades, including illegal drugs, illicit sex, and murder.

I also read that Comey uncovered 600,000 shocking emails on Anthony Wiener's computer with many tied to the missing emails destroyed on Hillary's devices, and some pertaining to child trafficking. Comey's people read the emails and found that Hillary was not connected to any crimes, which on the face is preposterous. Chris Wray claimed it is going to take the FBI 66 years to turn over its documents on the Seth Rich murder, proving there is no way the FBI could have closely examined Wiener's half a billion emails in just 3 days.

Hillary eating babies was all over the internet. Conspiracies about a Clinton "kill list" at Redit.com has it at 47 murders. Including Epstein.

What was shocking is that Comey announced the Weiner email batch 11 days before the election; before knowing what was in it, so conspiracies flourished. The Feds filter email batches using key word searches. Three days is easy for a computer. Today these searches are probably much better and faster with the rise of AI.

The human trait of confirmation bias is running rampant because of the internet and social media. Conspiracy theories are fervently believed because of that. Critical thinking is dead. My feeling is that the oligarchs and their unwitting "useful idiots" will have finished completely take over the country within 20 years. This country is doomed.

 

[Boris Norris]

You can believe a godless big bang by faith but I believe by faith that God created the universe.

The difference being the certain elements are scattered throughout the universe and in fact are part of our bodies. That's the evidence whereby you have an old book.
And you expect to be taken seriously. You're a joke.

 

[mark francis]

No Arizona did a forensic audit you morons didn't care
Yo morons are too stupid and hateful to convince
You will always find stupid excuses to ignore reality

 

[mark francis]

No Arizona did a forensic audit you morons didn't care
Yo morons are too stupid and hateful to convince
You will always find stupid excuses to ignore reality

Arizona lawmakers are still trying to get answers from the stonewalling officials who continue to block meaningful access to qualified fraud investigators.


5-12-21_Letter_to_Maricopa_County_Board.pdf (chipleybugle.com)

Clear evidence of fraud, corruption, and obstruction.



KAREN FANN COMMITTEES:

SENATE PRESIDENT Rules, Chairman FIFTY-FIFTH LEGISLATURE 1700 WEST WASHINGTON, SENATE PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007-2844 PHONE: (602) 926-5874 TOLL FREE: 1-800-352-8404 kfann@azleg.gov DISTRICT 1

Arizona State Senate May 12, 2021 Maricopa Board of Supervisors c/o Chairman Jack Sellers 301 West Jefferson Street, #10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003

Dear Chairman Sellers: I am writing to seek your assistance and cooperation in the resolution of three (3) serious issues that have arisen in the course of the Senate’s ongoing audit of the returns of the November 3, 2020 general election in Maricopa County. I. Ongoing Non-Compliance with the Legislative Subpoenas The first issue concerns Maricopa County’s apparent intent to renege on its previous commitment to comply fully with the legislative subpoenas issued on January 13, 2021, which, as you know, Judge Thomason found were valid and enforceable. To date, attorneys for Maricopa County have refused to produce virtual images of routers used in connection with the general election, relying on a conclusory and unsupported assertion that providing the routers would somehow “endanger the lives of law enforcement officers, their operations, or the protected health information and personal data of Maricopa County’s citizens.” If true, the fact that Maricopa County stores on its routers substantial quantities of citizens’ and employees’ highly sensitive personal information is an alarming indictment of the County’s lax data security practices, rather than of the legislative subpoenas.

Similarly, the County’s assertion that producing the internet routers for inspection would cost up to $6,000,000 seems at odds with Deputy County Attorney Joseph La Rue’s prior representation to Audit Liaison Ken Bennett that the routers already had been disconnected from the County’s network and were prepared for imminent delivery to the Senate. Nevertheless, in an effort to resolve the dispute regarding production of the routers, we propose that agents of CyFIR, an experienced digital forensics firm and subcontractor of Cyber Ninjas, review virtual images of the relevant routers in Maricopa County facilities and in the presence of representatives of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Such an arrangement would permit Maricopa County to retain custody and monitor the review of router data, while ensuring that the Senate may access the information it requires—and to which it is constitutionally entitled—to successfully complete its audit. The Senate has no interest in viewing or taking possession of any information that is unrelated to the administration of the 2020 general election.

Separately, Maricopa County has refused to provide the passwords necessary to access vote tabulation devices. Its attorneys’ insistence that the County does not have custody or control of this information is belied by the County’s conduct of its own audits, which, if they were as comprehensive as they purported to be, almost certainly would have entailed use of the passwords to examine the tabulation devices, and it strains credulity to posit that the County has no contractual right to obtain (i.e., control of) password information from Dominion. II. Chain of Custody and Ballot Organization Anomalies As the audit has progressed, the Senate’s contractors have become aware of apparent omissions, inconsistencies, and anomalies relating to Maricopa County’s handling, organization, and storage of ballots.

We hope you can assist us in understanding these issues, including specifically the following: 1. The County has not provided any chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots. Does such documentation exist, and if so, will it be produced? 2. The bags in which the ballots were stored are not sealed, although the audit team has found at the bottom of many boxes cut seals of the type that would have sealed a ballot bag. Why were these seals placed at the bottom of the boxes? 3. Batches within a box are frequently separated by only a divider without any indication of the corresponding batch numbers. In some cases, the batch dividers are missing altogether. This lack of organization has significantly complicated and delayed the audit team’s ballot processing efforts. What are the County’s procedures for sorting, organizing, and packaging ballot batches?

4. Most of the ballot boxes were sealed merely with regular tape and not secured by any kind of tamper-evident seal. Is that the County’s customary practice for storing ballots? 5. The audit team has encountered a significant number of instances in which there is a disparity between the actual number of ballots contained in a batch and the total denoted on the pink report slip accompanying the batch. In most of these instances, the total on the pink report slip is greater than the number of ballots in the batch, although there are a few instances in which the total is lower.

What are the reasons for these discrepancies? For your reference, please see several illustrative (i.e., not comprehensive) examples in the table below: Pallet Ballot Type Batch Pink Slip Total Actual Total Discrepancy 5 EV 2104 200 198 -2 5 EV 9276 200 165 -35 15 EV 9278 200 187 -13 15 EV 1643 200 218 18 7 EV 6359 197 187 -10 For your convenience, images of the corresponding pink report slips are attached in Exhibit A. III. Deleted Databases We have recently discovered that the entire “Database” directory from the D drive of the machine “EMSPrimary” has been deleted. This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena. In addition, the main database for the Election Management System (EMS) Software, “Results Tally and Reporting,” is not located anywhere on the EMSPrimary machine, even though all of the EMS Clients reference that machine as the location of the database. This suggests that the main database for all election related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed. Can you please advise as to why these folders were deleted, and whether there are any backups that may contain the deleted folders? The image below shows the location of the files known to be deleted. In addition, the main database for “Results Tally and Reporting” is not present. * * *

I am hopeful that we can constructively resolve these issues and questions without recourse to additional subpoenas or other compulsory process. To that end, I invite you and any other officers or employees of Maricopa County (to include officials in the Elections Department) who possess knowledge or information concerning the matters set forth above to a meeting at the Arizona State Capitol on Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. in Hearing Room 109. Chairman Petersen, former Secretary Bennett and I will attend the meeting, which will be live-streamed to the public. Please let me know at your earliest convenience whether you accept my invitation and, if so, which Maricopa County personnel will attend. Thank you for your cooperation on these important issues of public concern.

Respectfully, Karen Fann, President Arizona State Senate.

 

[mark francis]

Hillary eating babies was all over the internet. Conspiracies about a Clinton "kill list" at Redit.com has it at 47 murders. Including Epstein.

What was shocking is that Comey announced the Weiner email batch 11 days before the election; before knowing what was in it, so conspiracies flourished. The Feds filter email batches using key word searches. Three days is easy for a computer. Today these searches are probably much better and faster with the rise of AI.

The human trait of confirmation bias is running rampant because of the internet and social media. Conspiracy theories are fervently believed because of that. Critical thinking is dead. My feeling is that the oligarchs and their unwitting "useful idiots" will have finished completely take over the country within 20 years. This country is doomed.

Comey knew he was going to exonerate Hillary before he ever opened his mouth. It does not matter what he might have uncovered on Wiener's laptop if he had been given more time, because he was determined he was not going to find anything damaging to Hillary whether it was in the emails or not. He forgave Hillary of her sins before the FBI had even interviewed her about her violation of federal laws regarding the mishandling of classified materials on unlawful servers. The FBI never questioned her under oath as they are required to do in real investigations.

 

[Boris Norris]

Arizona lawmakers are still trying to get answers from the stonewalling officials who continue to block meaningful access to qualified fraud investigators.


5-12-21_Letter_to_Maricopa_County_Board.pdf (chipleybugle.com)

Clear evidence of fraud, corruption, and obstruction.



KAREN FANN COMMITTEES:

SENATE PRESIDENT Rules, Chairman FIFTY-FIFTH LEGISLATURE 1700 WEST WASHINGTON, SENATE PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007-2844 PHONE: (602) 926-5874 TOLL FREE: 1-800-352-8404 kfann@azleg.gov DISTRICT 1

Arizona State Senate May 12, 2021 Maricopa Board of Supervisors c/o Chairman Jack Sellers 301 West Jefferson Street, #10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003

Dear Chairman Sellers: I am writing to seek your assistance and cooperation in the resolution of three (3) serious issues that have arisen in the course of the Senate’s ongoing audit of the returns of the November 3, 2020 general election in Maricopa County. I. Ongoing Non-Compliance with the Legislative Subpoenas The first issue concerns Maricopa County’s apparent intent to renege on its previous commitment to comply fully with the legislative subpoenas issued on January 13, 2021, which, as you know, Judge Thomason found were valid and enforceable. To date, attorneys for Maricopa County have refused to produce virtual images of routers used in connection with the general election, relying on a conclusory and unsupported assertion that providing the routers would somehow “endanger the lives of law enforcement officers, their operations, or the protected health information and personal data of Maricopa County’s citizens.” If true, the fact that Maricopa County stores on its routers substantial quantities of citizens’ and employees’ highly sensitive personal information is an alarming indictment of the County’s lax data security practices, rather than of the legislative subpoenas.

Similarly, the County’s assertion that producing the internet routers for inspection would cost up to $6,000,000 seems at odds with Deputy County Attorney Joseph La Rue’s prior representation to Audit Liaison Ken Bennett that the routers already had been disconnected from the County’s network and were prepared for imminent delivery to the Senate. Nevertheless, in an effort to resolve the dispute regarding production of the routers, we propose that agents of CyFIR, an experienced digital forensics firm and subcontractor of Cyber Ninjas, review virtual images of the relevant routers in Maricopa County facilities and in the presence of representatives of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Such an arrangement would permit Maricopa County to retain custody and monitor the review of router data, while ensuring that the Senate may access the information it requires—and to which it is constitutionally entitled—to successfully complete its audit. The Senate has no interest in viewing or taking possession of any information that is unrelated to the administration of the 2020 general election.

Separately, Maricopa County has refused to provide the passwords necessary to access vote tabulation devices. Its attorneys’ insistence that the County does not have custody or control of this information is belied by the County’s conduct of its own audits, which, if they were as comprehensive as they purported to be, almost certainly would have entailed use of the passwords to examine the tabulation devices, and it strains credulity to posit that the County has no contractual right to obtain (i.e., control of) password information from Dominion. II. Chain of Custody and Ballot Organization Anomalies As the audit has progressed, the Senate’s contractors have become aware of apparent omissions, inconsistencies, and anomalies relating to Maricopa County’s handling, organization, and storage of ballots.

We hope you can assist us in understanding these issues, including specifically the following: 1. The County has not provided any chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots. Does such documentation exist, and if so, will it be produced? 2. The bags in which the ballots were stored are not sealed, although the audit team has found at the bottom of many boxes cut seals of the type that would have sealed a ballot bag. Why were these seals placed at the bottom of the boxes? 3. Batches within a box are frequently separated by only a divider without any indication of the corresponding batch numbers. In some cases, the batch dividers are missing altogether. This lack of organization has significantly complicated and delayed the audit team’s ballot processing efforts. What are the County’s procedures for sorting, organizing, and packaging ballot batches?

4. Most of the ballot boxes were sealed merely with regular tape and not secured by any kind of tamper-evident seal. Is that the County’s customary practice for storing ballots? 5. The audit team has encountered a significant number of instances in which there is a disparity between the actual number of ballots contained in a batch and the total denoted on the pink report slip accompanying the batch. In most of these instances, the total on the pink report slip is greater than the number of ballots in the batch, although there are a few instances in which the total is lower.

What are the reasons for these discrepancies? For your reference, please see several illustrative (i.e., not comprehensive) examples in the table below: Pallet Ballot Type Batch Pink Slip Total Actual Total Discrepancy 5 EV 2104 200 198 -2 5 EV 9276 200 165 -35 15 EV 9278 200 187 -13 15 EV 1643 200 218 18 7 EV 6359 197 187 -10 For your convenience, images of the corresponding pink report slips are attached in Exhibit A. III. Deleted Databases We have recently discovered that the entire “Database” directory from the D drive of the machine “EMSPrimary” has been deleted. This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena. In addition, the main database for the Election Management System (EMS) Software, “Results Tally and Reporting,” is not located anywhere on the EMSPrimary machine, even though all of the EMS Clients reference that machine as the location of the database. This suggests that the main database for all election related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed. Can you please advise as to why these folders were deleted, and whether there are any backups that may contain the deleted folders? The image below shows the location of the files known to be deleted. In addition, the main database for “Results Tally and Reporting” is not present. * * *

I am hopeful that we can constructively resolve these issues and questions without recourse to additional subpoenas or other compulsory process. To that end, I invite you and any other officers or employees of Maricopa County (to include officials in the Elections Department) who possess knowledge or information concerning the matters set forth above to a meeting at the Arizona State Capitol on Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. in Hearing Room 109. Chairman Petersen, former Secretary Bennett and I will attend the meeting, which will be live-streamed to the public. Please let me know at your earliest convenience whether you accept my invitation and, if so, which Maricopa County personnel will attend. Thank you for your cooperation on these important issues of public concern.

Respectfully, Karen Fann, President Arizona State Senate.

And not a word of it was presented as evidence. I wonder why.

 

[Lagboltz]

Comey knew he was going to exonerate Hillary before he ever opened his mouth. It does not matter what he might have uncovered on Wiener's laptop if he had been given more time, because he was determined he was not going to find anything damaging to Hillary whether it was in the emails or not. He forgave Hillary of her sins before the FBI had even interviewed her about her violation of federal laws regarding the mishandling of classified materials on unlawful servers. The FBI never questioned her under oath as they are required to do in real investigations.

Your interpretation of events sure sounds self-contradictory. The FBI worked for a year on the emails. If, as you say, Comey did not want to damage Hillary, why did he make that premature announcement 11 days before the election that raised doubt and severely damaged her chances?

That whole episode was weird, but you and your sources certainly don't have any insight on it.

 

[pjmret]

Arizona lawmakers are still trying to get answers from the stonewalling officials who continue to block meaningful access to qualified fraud investigators.


5-12-21_Letter_to_Maricopa_County_Board.pdf (chipleybugle.com)

Clear evidence of fraud, corruption, and obstruction.



KAREN FANN COMMITTEES:

SENATE PRESIDENT Rules, Chairman FIFTY-FIFTH LEGISLATURE 1700 WEST WASHINGTON, SENATE PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007-2844 PHONE: (602) 926-5874 TOLL FREE: 1-800-352-8404 kfann@azleg.gov DISTRICT 1

Arizona State Senate May 12, 2021 Maricopa Board of Supervisors c/o Chairman Jack Sellers 301 West Jefferson Street, #10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003

Dear Chairman Sellers: I am writing to seek your assistance and cooperation in the resolution of three (3) serious issues that have arisen in the course of the Senate’s ongoing audit of the returns of the November 3, 2020 general election in Maricopa County. I. Ongoing Non-Compliance with the Legislative Subpoenas The first issue concerns Maricopa County’s apparent intent to renege on its previous commitment to comply fully with the legislative subpoenas issued on January 13, 2021, which, as you know, Judge Thomason found were valid and enforceable. To date, attorneys for Maricopa County have refused to produce virtual images of routers used in connection with the general election, relying on a conclusory and unsupported assertion that providing the routers would somehow “endanger the lives of law enforcement officers, their operations, or the protected health information and personal data of Maricopa County’s citizens.” If true, the fact that Maricopa County stores on its routers substantial quantities of citizens’ and employees’ highly sensitive personal information is an alarming indictment of the County’s lax data security practices, rather than of the legislative subpoenas.

Similarly, the County’s assertion that producing the internet routers for inspection would cost up to $6,000,000 seems at odds with Deputy County Attorney Joseph La Rue’s prior representation to Audit Liaison Ken Bennett that the routers already had been disconnected from the County’s network and were prepared for imminent delivery to the Senate. Nevertheless, in an effort to resolve the dispute regarding production of the routers, we propose that agents of CyFIR, an experienced digital forensics firm and subcontractor of Cyber Ninjas, review virtual images of the relevant routers in Maricopa County facilities and in the presence of representatives of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Such an arrangement would permit Maricopa County to retain custody and monitor the review of router data, while ensuring that the Senate may access the information it requires—and to which it is constitutionally entitled—to successfully complete its audit. The Senate has no interest in viewing or taking possession of any information that is unrelated to the administration of the 2020 general election.

Separately, Maricopa County has refused to provide the passwords necessary to access vote tabulation devices. Its attorneys’ insistence that the County does not have custody or control of this information is belied by the County’s conduct of its own audits, which, if they were as comprehensive as they purported to be, almost certainly would have entailed use of the passwords to examine the tabulation devices, and it strains credulity to posit that the County has no contractual right to obtain (i.e., control of) password information from Dominion. II. Chain of Custody and Ballot Organization Anomalies As the audit has progressed, the Senate’s contractors have become aware of apparent omissions, inconsistencies, and anomalies relating to Maricopa County’s handling, organization, and storage of ballots.

We hope you can assist us in understanding these issues, including specifically the following: 1. The County has not provided any chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots. Does such documentation exist, and if so, will it be produced? 2. The bags in which the ballots were stored are not sealed, although the audit team has found at the bottom of many boxes cut seals of the type that would have sealed a ballot bag. Why were these seals placed at the bottom of the boxes? 3. Batches within a box are frequently separated by only a divider without any indication of the corresponding batch numbers. In some cases, the batch dividers are missing altogether. This lack of organization has significantly complicated and delayed the audit team’s ballot processing efforts. What are the County’s procedures for sorting, organizing, and packaging ballot batches?

4. Most of the ballot boxes were sealed merely with regular tape and not secured by any kind of tamper-evident seal. Is that the County’s customary practice for storing ballots? 5. The audit team has encountered a significant number of instances in which there is a disparity between the actual number of ballots contained in a batch and the total denoted on the pink report slip accompanying the batch. In most of these instances, the total on the pink report slip is greater than the number of ballots in the batch, although there are a few instances in which the total is lower.

What are the reasons for these discrepancies? For your reference, please see several illustrative (i.e., not comprehensive) examples in the table below: Pallet Ballot Type Batch Pink Slip Total Actual Total Discrepancy 5 EV 2104 200 198 -2 5 EV 9276 200 165 -35 15 EV 9278 200 187 -13 15 EV 1643 200 218 18 7 EV 6359 197 187 -10 For your convenience, images of the corresponding pink report slips are attached in Exhibit A. III. Deleted Databases We have recently discovered that the entire “Database” directory from the D drive of the machine “EMSPrimary” has been deleted. This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena. In addition, the main database for the Election Management System (EMS) Software, “Results Tally and Reporting,” is not located anywhere on the EMSPrimary machine, even though all of the EMS Clients reference that machine as the location of the database. This suggests that the main database for all election related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed. Can you please advise as to why these folders were deleted, and whether there are any backups that may contain the deleted folders? The image below shows the location of the files known to be deleted. In addition, the main database for “Results Tally and Reporting” is not present. * * *

I am hopeful that we can constructively resolve these issues and questions without recourse to additional subpoenas or other compulsory process. To that end, I invite you and any other officers or employees of Maricopa County (to include officials in the Elections Department) who possess knowledge or information concerning the matters set forth above to a meeting at the Arizona State Capitol on Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. in Hearing Room 109. Chairman Petersen, former Secretary Bennett and I will attend the meeting, which will be live-streamed to the public. Please let me know at your earliest convenience whether you accept my invitation and, if so, which Maricopa County personnel will attend. Thank you for your cooperation on these important issues of public concern.

Respectfully, Karen Fann, President Arizona State Senate.

Who was qualified? What are their qualifications?

 

[mark francis]

And not a word of it was presented as evidence. I wonder why.

The fraud issue has not been resolved in Arizona. Far from it.

 

[mark francis]

Your interpretation of events sure sounds self-contradictory. The FBI worked for a year on the emails. If, as you say, Comey did not want to damage Hillary, why did he make that premature announcement 11 days before the election that raised doubt and severely damaged her chances?

That whole episode was weird, but you and your sources certainly don't have any insight on it.

Comey did not find the evidence on Wiener's computer, others did, and Comey knew he had better admit the evidence turned up if he did not want fellow FBI agents going all whistleblower on his cheating rear end. He actually sat on the evidence for a long time before he decided he had better come clean.

 

[mark francis]

Who was qualified? What are their qualifications?

The question is, who do the corrupt election officials think they are by declaring that if any forensics expert they do not approve of looks at their machines than those machines will be damaged beyond repair. If the machines can be damaged like that, then they have already been damaged by incompetent election workers, considering what a huge mess they made of the 2020 election.