i support the court rulings that said there was no credible evidence of the stolen election.
the rulings that make you look like the ***** you are
If a judge ruled that he did not clearly see in the evidence before him that voter fraud had taken place then his opinion was limited to his opinion of what he saw and deduced from the limited evidence of fraud he was scanning, but not investigating. That does not mean that the evidence he was scanning clearly showed no fraud occurred and also does not mean that his ruling has anything to do with any other evidence of fraud.
Types of voter fraud exposed in past elections:
Ballot harvesting
Ballot drops
Multiple voting
Buying votes
Voting machine fraud
Stuffing ballot boxes
Felony voting
Illegal alien voting
Underage voting
Voting for the dead
Illegal registrations
Lying on voting applications
Lying on applications for absentee voting
Banning observers from vote counting
Intimidation of voters
Stuffed voter rolls
Fake addresses
Signature verification scams
Chain of custody violations
Tampering with dates stamped on mail in ballots
Omitting names from ballots scams
Candidate violations of residency requirements
Erasing or altering records of voting transactions
Destruction or tampering with memory devices on voting machines
Voting machines connected to the internet
Control of voting machines by a single party
Refusing to allow voting machines to be examined immediately after elections for verification of honesty and accuracy
Voting of one individual in multiple states in same election
Criminalizing voter fraud investigations
Accepting ballots after the close of acceptance deadlines
And more.