Those Wacky Tea-Baggers!!!

[rationalist]

Really?

 

[always]

Absolutely.

It always amazes me how The Incurious always seem to know things no one else knows.

​

Shaman, I expect the information contained in the head of a gnat would AMAZE YOU!!

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Shaman, I expect the information contained in the head of a gnat would AMAZE YOU!!

oooooooooo.....how witty.

 

[ktucan1]

oooooooooo.....how witty.

I got to admit that poster is hilarious....on a side note did you all hear about Capt. American?

Here is he link and to be honest The Tea Party needs to get a grip just a little a bit.http://www.comicsalliance.com/2010/02/11/captain-america-tea-party-controversy/

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I got to admit that poster is hilarious....on a side note did you all hear about Capt. American?

Yeah....I saw that on "Countdown".

*

Don't forget about The ANTI-Hero!!!!

 

[Gipper]

The title of this thread is straight out of the left's hero's Rules for Radicals.

Ridicule your opponent...right?

If the right used a vulgar term to describe lefties, they would go nuts and fake outrage.

Well they do this when they are called Liberals!

 

[Mr. Shaman]

The title of this thread is straight out of the left's hero's Rules for Radicals.

Ridicule your opponent...right?

If the right used a vulgar term to describe lefties.....

Yeah....what're the chances?

*

 

[Mr. Shaman]

The title of this thread is straight out of the left's hero's Rules for Radicals.

Ridicule your opponent...right?

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh....you've heard o' thathttp://mediamatters.org/search/tag/glenn_beck_show, huh??

​

 

[OldTrapper]

That's what BUSHCO always insisted.


​

Yep. Those Arabs goth their visa's under Bush, and then they expired. And, of course, all of their flight training took place after Bush was elected. Why, nothing occured under Clinton.

BTW, as far as Iraq was concerned, was it not Clinton&Co. that told the world that Hussein was getting nuclear material to make weapons with? Was it not Clinton that admitted he had 14 chances to get OBL, and did not? Was it not Clinton that signed into law in 1998 the Iraqui Freedom Act, and planned on invading Iraq in 2000, and then changed his mind due to the election?

All of those little facts you choose to ignore.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Was it not Clinton that signed into law in 1998 the Iraqui Freedom Act, and planned on invading Iraq in 2000, and then changed his mind due to the election?

No. You're thinking of Richard Clarke.​

"The result was a strategy paper that he had presented to Berger and the other national security "principals" on Dec. 20. But Berger and the principals decided to shelve the plan and let the next Administration take it up. With less than a month left in office, they did not think it appropriate to launch a major initiative against Osama bin Laden. "We would be handing [the Bush Administration] a war when they took office on Jan. 20," says a former senior Clinton aide. "That wasn't going to happen." Now it was up to Rice's team to consider what Clarke had put together."

They had no desire to do a "Daddy Bush".​

"Bush Senior went into Somalia with 20 thousand US troops in December, 1992 when he had been defeated in his re-election bid by Bill Clinton and was a lame-duck President. Why such a major overseas undertaking by an outgoing president was a question that perplexed many. He went in there to save the interest of US oil giants from his native Texas. After all, he had made his fortunes in the oil industry before making a mark in politics. The powerful and influence-peddling oil cartel had bankrolled him into politics, and he was anxious to pay back in kind. He might have lost his own bid for re-election but he had sons waiting in the wings to inherit his mantle. He had to lubricate their passage into high-stakes politics by obliging his powerful friends."

 

[OldTrapper]

No. You're thinking of Richard Clarke.

They had no desire to do a "Daddy Bush".​

As your articles stated in support of what I said, Clinton signed into law the Iraqui Freedom Act, and then decided not to invade for political reasons.

Point is, Clinton supported the invasion of Iraq. This was long before Bush 43 was elected.

 

[rationalist]

Yes, the war on Iraq was planned a long time before the Government started lying about WMD and the need for regime change.

 

[OldTrapper]

Yes, the war on Iraq was planned a long time before the Government started lying about WMD and the need for regime change.

Guess you missed the justification for Clinton's signing of the Iraqui Freedom Act. Nothing new for you since you can't even answer simple questions.

Do you know what is really sad about prople like you? There is so much truth around for one to explore, and complain about, yet you choose to believe, and promote, unproven lies.

 

[rationalist]

Unproven lies?

What are they then?

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Point is, Clinton supported the invasion of Iraq. This was long before Bush 43 was elected.

....And, I'm sure you can provide his statement, supporting that position.

You're on-the-clock.....

<Tick><Tick><Tick><Tick><Tick><Tick><Tick><Tick>....​