I have ALL of the valid arguments, all you libs have is slander, lies, and defamation of character against the very people who provide you with the freedoms you enjoy.
You're the one who was engaging in childish name calling, not the other side. I'll ignore the term "lib", as I said when outlining my political philosophy that there would be those with simplistic left-right viewpoints who would call me a liberal.
I'm OK with it, as it has no meaning in the real world anyway.
McCain suddenly took the position that it was "torture" in order to attempt to garner some votes from you wimps.
Oh, now McCain and I are "wimps"? I'm a wimp for opposing the war? I opposed the last inadvisable and disastrous war the US engaged in, also. It wasn't a popular position, but we turned out to be right in the long run, as Vietnam is not a part of any "Communist block", the nations of SE Asia didn't fall to a domino theory, and the world didn't end when we lost that war that never should have been. Sometimes it takes a pair to stand up and say, “Hey, the emperor has no clothes! That war is wrong, the commander is wrong, and we need to change what we're doing." It's a lot easier to simply mouth the talking points of the administration, or simply ignore what is going on.
And McCain, who was shot down, imprisoned, and tortured for trying to serve his country in that disastrous and inadvisable war is a wimp also, or at least is pandering to "wimps"? That is an insult to a war hero who has spent a lifetime serving this country.
Are you a closet supporter of Obama?
If water boarding really were "torture" it would be ILLEGAL for us to do it to our troops as part of their training. I have been water boarded when i went through AF survival school, have YOU?
It must be legal since it isn't torture, and it isn't torture since it is legal.
Typical circular reasoning.
And, you are still ignoring the well established fact that a lot more went on than weatherboarding of a handful of the worst terrorists.
Oh, and BTW, you're the one who has lost, because you don't have a single fact to rely on, or you would have presented them already.
I've presented them, many times on this forum. It's a lot easier to ignore facts and logic and simply continue to believe what you want to believe.
But, one more time, here are some for you to ignore or simply say that they aren't true:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/mar2008/dark-m24.shtml
And one more.
Captives at Guantánamo Bay were chained hand and foot in a fetal position to the floor for 18 hours or more, urinating and defecating on themselves, an FBI report has revealed.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jan/03/guantanamo.usa
But, of course, the above and a lot more have already been posted. Maybe you missed it.
They're not? Then where are they? The last time I checked, they were all at Club Gitmo, do you have evidence to the contrary?
Except for the ones who are dead or who have been released, yes, they're still at Gitmo.
If you find my language to be insulting, that's not my problem, it's YOURS.
No, it isn't a problem at all from my perspective, as it shows beyond a reasonable doubt that you have no real argument. Insulting those who disagree with you is not an argument, but it says volumes about the speaker.