The Guardian put Clinton's and Trump's stances on various subjects side by si

[Zanna]

So someone from "The Guardian" was watching closesly these campaigns and gathered up all the little and big things that Clinton and Trump said during their respective campaigns.
They put various subjects and each candidate's stance side by side. Subjects include healthcare, education, foreign policy, immigration, criminal justice, economy, environment and gun control.

For example:

Trade
Clinton:After some prevarication,came out against the Trans-Pacific Partnership, despite helping negotiate it during her time as secretary of state. She said at a debate in October: “It was just finally negotiated last week, and in looking at it, it didn’t meet my standards, my standards for more new, good jobs for Americans, for raising wages for Americans.”

Trump:Slams the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Argues that since China joined the World Trade Organisation, Americans have witnessed the closure of more than 50,000 factories and the loss of tens of millions of jobs.Plans to bring China to the bargaining tableby declaring it a currency manipulator and revive US manufacturing by putting an end to China’s “illegal export subsidies and lax labour and environmental standards”.

It just serves to show nicely the summary of what kind of arguements the candidates have or don't have, when compared side by side.

Here's the whole article: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...mmigration-gun-control-environment?CMP=twt_gu

 

[BigRob]

On The Issues also does this.