Pandora
Well-Known Member
I read from multiple sources that 35,000 people showed up to the Dallas one.
I wonder why the news did not cover it much. Gretta did some but only the DC one.
I read from multiple sources that 35,000 people showed up to the Dallas one.
I have not seen reports, so I have no idea if they did or not, I was just pointing out that the Dallas one was reported to have 35,000 people attend.
I wonder why the news did not cover it much. Gretta did some but only the DC one.
1) There weren't nearly as many as there were on tax day.
2) The lamestream media learned their lesson from the backlash of their blatantly partisan coverage of the tax day ones, so this time they just stayed away.
1) There weren't nearly as many as there were on tax day.
2) The lamestream media learned their lesson from the backlash of their blatantly partisan coverage of the tax day ones, so this time they just stayed away.
You mean this kind of "blatantly partisan coverage?"
Faux News not only covered the teabaggers but they affixed their name to the parties..That and their 24/7 endorsement was one of the main reasons why attendance was better in April..had Faux done a similar thing this past weekend the crowds would have been much larger, as you can always count on the RW buffoons to do whatever Faux tells them like good little sheeple.
I'm going to beat a dead horse...run all of the parties you want, but until you come up with an alternative tax proposal that really adds up, you won't be taken seriously.
And, please don't give me more about the Fair Tax. The numbers don't add up and it is based on unsubstantiated economic theory. There is an answer, but I'm continually disappointed that people don't want to hear about it because the press has done such a good job miss representing it.
I'm going to beat a dead horse...run all of the parties you want, but until you come up with an alternative tax proposal that really adds up, you won't be taken seriously.
And, please don't give me more about the Fair Tax. The numbers don't add up and it is based on unsubstantiated economic theory. There is an answer, but I'm continually disappointed that people don't want to hear about it because the press has done such a good job miss representing it.
One of the problems with the original tea parties was that even though they organized the gathering, they did a poor job of turning it into a meaningful, substantive, rally. They should have had speakers at these events talking about alternatives and discussing intitiatives to educate the general public on the the risk/reward of other possibilites.
The problem, IMHO, is that very few people can really explain any of the alternatives and can only sling mud at the current proposed direction. We need to talk real numbers and real impact not just say it will be bad or good. We need to give families a formula so they can see what the difference would be, instead of just playing the scare tactic card.
Without substance, these emotion based events lose steam quickly.