So what can we do about Global Warming?

[palerider]

who was it that lost theyre ass on the drug issue?

You roker. Claiming that drugs are perfectly harmless using 100 year old research and the word of an uneducated doper.

 

[Coyote]

I'll admit I didn't and don't follow the drug issue - it's not an issue that I've ever been really concerned about. :?

 

[Rokerijdude11]

Pale rider assumes once again that his opinions in the marijuana legalization thread somehow counted as actual facts. i presented him with far too much factual information for him to ingest over a week so he instead threw out his opinions as facts

as well he STATED HIMSELF that he somehow somewhere had proven some of what Jak Herer written was WRONG....He as well claimed to contact Jack herer with this proof in order to collect the 100 grand offered by Jack


problem being it never happened....he was asked by several members here to simply provide the transcripts of the proof that was sent off to Mr. Herer re repeatedly ignored the requests


he repeatedly ingored requests for ANY documentation to support his OPINIONS whe you are in the news for having collected 100 grand we will know for sure you proved something wrong


but beingthat i personally know Jack and have been keeping tabs on this issue.............Palerider is a KNOWN LIAR..he hasnt any proof of anything he is full of opinion and pomp but beyond that NATTA zip



you did in FACT insult the poster in this thread as you continue to do on a daily basis to anyone who make you have to think.........it is your Game and yes you do come to Play it here


the point of outing you is obvious to all of course but you

 

[Rokerijdude11]

You roker. Claiming that drugs are perfectly harmless using 100 year old research and the word of an uneducated doper.

NO NO NO palerider get it right for one frigging time can you do that? is it frigging possible?

I CLEARLY STATED THAT MARIJUANA was not harmful not "DRUGS" as you project in your misleading statement but then that is another of your hallmarks isnt it? putting words in peoples mouths


to this DATE you have YET to provide any factual data that you have been repeatedly asked for all you have been able to muster was a simple blanket statement any 5th grade dare student could have parroted

"there is a growing body of evidence"


yet you cant seem to produce it? and your still not the recipient of the 100 grand are ya big guy???

no didnt think so

nice try

 

[Rokerijdude11]

I'll admit I didn't and don't follow the drug issue - it's not an issue that I've ever been really concerned about. :?

It wasnt a "Drug" issue he is misleading you all by stating something i never said

the discussion was MARIJUANA


not all Drugs you need to watch what and how he speaks

 

[Rokerijdude11]

uneducated doper huh?


then collecting the 100 grand should be a cakewalk for such an educated shill as yourself?


why havent you?



wheres your BOOK to prove it all wrong?


your out of your league boy

 

[palerider]

Pale rider assumes once again that his opinions in the marijuana legalization thread somehow counted as actual facts. i presented him with far too much factual information for him to ingest over a week so he instead threw out his opinions as facts

You provided what might have been considered fact 50 years ago since that was the average age of your reference material.

Just to refresh your memory, here were the first of the sources I provided:

http://www.cannabisclub.ca/articles/...l_lancet_1.pdf

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract

http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/1999/...pot991217.html

http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/c...act/90/16/1198

http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/con...ract/8/12/1071

http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/83/4/637.pdf


You do like to go on about how I divert topics. The topic on this thread is global warming. Do you have anything to contribute or not. You claim that the sources I provide are not factual. Prove it. Or are you going to continue to divert the topic on this thread?

 

[Rokerijdude11]

NOne of your links have any CONCLUSIVE evidence alot of coulds maybes in some cases etc.....

nothing near concrete

i will clearly ask you one last time can you provide


1. the EXACT part of what Jack Herer authored that you CLAIM to have proven worng

2. the proof to substantiate your Claim ....supported by conclusive evidence


3. the transcripts of the information you supposedly sent to Mr Herer


4. ANY .........ANY transcript of acknowledgement that Mr Herer has EVER even spoken to you on the issue


who was it that spun the thread down this direction pal?


thats right YOU


well sisnce we all know your unable to answer the 4 questions i suppose we are finished

 

[Rokerijdude11]

You provided what might have been considered fact 50 years ago since that was the average age of your reference material.

Just to refresh your memory, here were the first of the sources I provided:

http://www.cannabisclub.ca/articles/...l_lancet_1.pdf

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract

http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/1999/...pot991217.html

http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/c...act/90/16/1198

http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/con...ract/8/12/1071

http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/83/4/637.pdf


You do like to go on about how I divert topics. The topic on this thread is global warming. Do you have anything to contribute or not. You claim that the sources I provide are not factual. Prove it. Or are you going to continue to divert the topic on this thread?

BTW

the 50 year old part of my information was the part of it that lays out the way they were able to orchestrate PROHIBITION of Marijuana BY LIES and decieit

that did in fact start in 1937

i have implored you to start there several times and yet you go on aand on about "DRUGS" we are talking HEMP/Marijuana is that so hard for you to sepearate?
when you want to start at the beginnings of the Prohibitoon and lies we can start right in 1937


you have YET to start at the beginning why?> because your UNABLE to refute the information plain and simple
when you are ready to start at 1937 you let me know Mr DRUGS

 

[Rokerijdude11]

Yep. That describes you to a "T".



I have no game. I come here to discuss issues.

interesting then that you said this 2 posts above

is called gamesmanship

no insults in this either huh?

I believe that people who are forever asking for information rather than taking the time to look it up on their own are genuinely stupid.

my my funny if roker or abraxis made a blanket statement like that you ALL would assail him as you have demonstarted over the last 2 weeks yet ole palepuss and the mods say what they want when they want quite telling

pot meet kettle any time your ready the chapters are up nd posted we can start at chapter 1 if your up to it

 

[USMC the Almighty]

Roker, stop. You're just destroying yet another good thread.

 

[palerider]

NOne of your links have any CONCLUSIVE evidence alot of coulds maybes in some cases etc.....

And your 100 year old data upon which you made the claim that smoking pot was harmless did?

 

[TVoffBrainOn]

so...marijuana is causing global warming? therefore, man smoking marijuana is causing global warming? im confused...

 

[palerider]

so...marijuana is causing global warming? therefore, man smoking marijuana is causing global warming? im confused...

He can't win a head to head debate on the thread where the topic is being discussed, so he goes about sniping at me from the sidelines for reasons that I am sure only he can explain.

 

[invest07]

I am Al Gore.........high priest and prophet of the Global Warming religion.

And I demand you pay tithes to me (by buying carbon credits).

The science is settled so there will be no further debate on this topic.

Worship me or you shall fry!!!