Should marijuana be legalized?

[USMC the Almighty]

!!!!all you have done since you enetered the thread is behave like a child?

Talk about acting like a child. You're the one who changes fonts/colors/sizes/faces every sentence and calls people names at every opportunity. It would really make it easier for everyone to both read/understand your posts, and respond to them if you followed the intended format for responses and without the sophomoric quips.

 

[Rokerijdude11]

do you have anything of substance for the Discussion? No i didnt think so you dont like the colors? too bad, it defines my answers from the O.P

you are alos Un-educated in this area i am to assume from your meaningless drivel of an answer.......




So i have been calling people names through this thread? really??????? intersting the only thing i have mentioned, is that some of you are Un-Educated, in the subject? hardly name calling at all!! Simply a fact that is revealing itself...... have a nice day
try again buddy? you aint got nothing

 

[USMC the Almighty]

I was just pointing out the irony in you calling someone else a child. In no way do I intend to interfere iwth the discussion, but that one shot was just too much. Carry on...

 

[9sublime]

I don't see how changing the colour of his font makes his point any less valid.

It's not the colour of the point you are making, its the point itself.

Waste of a post USMC. So why don't you stay out of the discussion in future rather than coming out with **** stirring little comments that disrupt the flow. PLC1 is a big enough tit when it comes to ruining a debate with stupid little comments as it is without your useless input.

 

[Rokerijdude11]

sophmoric quips? certainly you are referring to our good friend plc? these are two of his responses thus far.......nothing like playing favorites hey sparky?

PLC says:

Did you used to use capital letters and punctuation before smoking pot so much?

PlC says:

Say, Roker, you don't smoke the stuff before flying, do you?

Funny how many of you are Un-Educated in this area im sorry your un-able to read the book? that seems to be an issue for all of you .None have reda the book yet all feel they are qualified to respond to something they know nothing about


How Bout you mr USMC have YOU read the BOOK?

no didnt think so

have a nice day

btw how you folks ever intend on floating this site with your Gang tactics on responding to people is questionable

Funny how i am fending off whordes of you at every turn Im quite sure this is very attractive to prospective new members!!!!

Im sure they LOve seeing if they post a point of view they will have to battle virtually the whole site especially if they know what theyre talking about

 

[Rokerijdude11]

I was just pointing out the irony in you calling someone else a child. In no way do I intend to interfere iwth the discussion, but that one shot was just too much. Carry on...

Ill ask you again Directly


WHERE IN THIS THREAD WAS I CALLING ANYONE NAMES???

answer please or Stay off the porch

 

[USMC the Almighty]

Ill ask you again Directly


WHERE IN THIS THREAD WAS I CALLING ANYONE NAMES???

answer please or Stay off the porch

You're right, Roker, we should all emulate your righteous and noble posting style. You never call names, belittle other posters, or disrespect them personally.

I wasn't going to say anything about namecalling until you made a big deal out of some little comment, PLC1 made.

Here's a brief overview of the type of honorable posting in this thread that you bless us all with:

To Palerider:

“you have shown your true colors Mr Know Nothing”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4329&postcount=68

“the Only Uneducated man in this thread at this point appears to be YOU”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72

“its only the sheep…”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72

“because you arent educated enough”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72

“you are woefully Un-educated”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72

“again your Ignorance of the realities of what Jack has writtent about surfaces like a slug in a heavy rain storm.”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72

“I really enjoy it when you flat earthers try and assert yourselves but then shrink from direct challenge”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72

“none of you thus far Knows Diddly sh^t on this subject”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4463&postcount=84


To PLC1:

“Would you care to expound on this OH Exhalted Dare Graduate?”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4462&postcount=83

“…you seem rather Un-educated…”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4462&postcount=83

“you must be a CHILD?”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4486&postcount=90

“ohhhh OUCH that really hurts what are you an eight grader?”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4486&postcount=90

“your just a kid, on daddys pc”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4486&postcount=90

And here’s the gamebreaker:

“all you have done since you enetered the thread is behave like a child?”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4486&postcount=90

 

[9sublime]

Ok, so he likes calling people uneducated.

you like basing your judgement on people on the colour of their post.

i think we can see which one is more ignorant.

 

[USMC the Almighty]

Ok, so he likes calling people uneducated.

you like basing your judgement on people on the colour of their post.

i think we can see which one is more ignorant.

Ok, you're clearly just siding with him because you agree with him politically. At any rate, I don't base any judgement on this color of the post. I still consider his posts as if they were written by a sober person in normal faced/colored font. I just found it humrous that he was calling someone else a child.

 

[9sublime]

No I'm agreeing with him because you wade in here with a stupid comment like that which has no relevance to anything just to stir up some **** like a child.

Now can we stop having a slagging match however funny it might become and get back to what this forum is for.

 

[Rokerijdude11]

You're right, Roker, we should all emulate your righteous and noble posting style. You never call names, belittle other posters, or disrespect them personally.
Great then lets see what we can find here shall we?
I wasn't going to say anything about namecalling until you made a big deal out of some little comment, PLC1 made.

Here's a brief overview of the type of honorable posting in this thread that you bless us all with:

To Palerider:

“you have shown your true colors Mr Know Nothing”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4329&postcount=68

Mr. Know Nothing...hmmmmmm wow what a name ? whew ill try and refrain from such derrogatory inflammatory names in the future



“the Only Uneducated man in this thread at this point appears to be YOU”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72



On the subject we were discussing HE IS UN-EDUCATED? simple fact sorry




“its only the sheep…”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72

this was a "GENERAL" statement not directed at anyone in particular so again not really name calling then




“because you arent educated enough”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72


Because you not educated enough???????? This is calling someone a name? It is stating a fact, that is becoming clear. He is not educated enough, to respond in a manner that will be of any use


“you are woefully Un-educated”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72

Try again..........simply stating, that on the subject being discussed, the individual is not educated well enough, to respond.Its simply an observation, not a name calling as you suggest

“


again your Ignorance of the realities of what Jack has writtent about surfaces like a slug in a heavy rain storm.”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72


Ummmmm......If id said your Ignorant, id have been calling him a name... Ignorance is not calling a name, it is a description of something.. again your out of context sorry

And surfacing like a slug, in heavy rain storm.. is in no way a direct inferrance, or name calling either. its a "saying" a "phrase" again to describe something




“I really enjoy it when you flat earthers try and assert yourselves but then shrink from direct challenge”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4349&postcount=72


OHHH yes i used the EXACT term, Mr. Palerider addressed me with .......eye for an eye, He called it first. I just sent it back to him? no harm, no foul, passed between


“none of you thus far Knows Diddly sh^t on this subject”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4463&postcount=84

okay? where is the name calling here? they DONT KNOW DIDDLY SH^T? where did i call someone a name???????????


To PLC1:

“Would you care to expound on this OH Exhalted Dare Graduate?”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4462&postcount=83
,

well ill be........... calling someone a dare graduate, is considered name calling? Wow ill bet your kids dont think so?


“…you seem rather Un-educated…”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4462&postcount=83

Again Un -educated is not a name .nor is it name calling ???Its an Observation


“you must be a CHILD?”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4486&postcount=90


this is calling names? wow dude twisted your bonnet too tight huh?......asking you must be a child? is calling someone a name? And calling one a child, is name calling? wtf are you drinking?



“ohhhh OUCH that really hurts what are you an eight grader?”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4486&postcount=90


wow called someone an eighth grader get out the soap bar...get real


“your just a kid, on daddys pc”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4486&postcount=90
of course agin this is an OBSERVATIONARY statement? I didnt call him any names?
And here’s the gamebreaker:

“all you have done since you enetered the thread is behave like a child?”
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4486&postcount=90

wow......gamebreaker indeed .i called him a ....... a................. a CHILD!!! Oh MY how horrible? give me a break go away your not interested in the subject your interested in diverting attention

whatever dude have a gret day i will im goin for a ride sun is shing its 75 degrees

knees in the breeze boys have a good one cya later on

 

[USMC the Almighty]

wow......gamebreaker indeed .i called him a ....... a................. a CHILD!!! Oh MY how horrible?

You and sublime just don't get it, do you. I never said that your namecalling is "oh so horrible". Of course it's mild to what you were really thinking. But it serves to strengthen my point that you are being hypocritical in calling someone else a child, when you act more childish than anyone on this bord.

give me a break go away your not interested in the subject your interested in diverting attention

I am very interested in the subject. In fact, that Milton Friedman video single-handedly changed my opinion on this subject.

 

[PLC1]

Ok, so he likes calling people uneducated.

you like basing your judgement on people on the colour of their post.

i think we can see which one is more ignorant.

I believe the discussion was about legalizing pot, not about the personalities of the debaters on this forum.

If a correspondent wants to be taken seriously, then the way to accomplish that should be to have valid arguments, backed up by facts, and written in standard English. I usually don't comment on that last one, but when someone writes in an ungrammatical fashion while extolling the virtues of pot smoking, it does raise the question of whether that writer simply never learned the conventions of writing, or whether his brain is so addled on pot that he can no longer apply them.

Changing the color, size, or case of the font doesn't change the message being written one way or another.

 

[9sublime]

You and sublime just don't get it, do you. I never said that your namecalling is "oh so horrible".

Neither did I, this was about accusing someones views of being invalid because of the colour of their font.

 

[Rokerijdude11]

I believe the discussion was about legalizing pot, not about the personalities of the debaters on this forum.


Really? Wasnt that you who was taking pot shots at my grammar? This isnt school buddy, this is the real world.....wasnt it you making snyde remarks about smoking po,t while being in the navy? When was it exactly, that YOU, were discussing anything about the legalization of marijauana? .....Because we all seem to have missed that part of the conversation.



If a correspondent wants to be taken seriously, then the way to accomplish that should be to have valid arguments, backed up by facts, and written in standard English. I usually don't comment on that last one, but when someone writes in an ungrammatical fashion while extolling the virtues of pot smoking, it does raise the question of whether that writer simply never learned the conventions of writing, or whether his brain is so addled on pot that he can no longer apply them.




my my my a little bit of the pot calling the kettle black i see.....No matter.You are using this as

1.) A Cop out as your simply not educated enough about the subject to actually debate it

2.)totally doing what it is you all are accusing me of

3.) proving to us how you simply dont Know enough about the subject or else you would be debating it as you suggest this is what the purpose of the thread was....



Changing the color, size, or case of the font doesn't change the message being written one way or another.

well thank you for that maybe your friend USMC should take a harder look at his position huh? have a nice day

watch out for the Grammar police!!!!


Pfffft whatever





FYI ................I was already In BOOTCAMP 3 weeks BEFORE i was 17 been on my own since freshman year.....the rest of high school really wasnt a priority at that time....I dint go back for my GED until i was over 40 yrs old..... so the grammar? too bad charlie I didnt have the luxury of school like you. i was busy serving our country.
and reality is in my world Grammar dosent really account for a whole lot...sorry i live in a real world. have a nice day