R
Rokerijdude11
Guest
I have posted the info from NIDA above. footnotes if you care to hit the library and look at the data.
The burden of proof is well met.
No it hasnt.......the NIDA report is ANYTHING but conclusive hard evidence Im sorry?
You've continually used the fact that "science says CAN cause, MAY cause, etc." as proof of there being no proof. This is incorrect. "It can cause [in some cases]," is a more definitive statement on the intent of the words "possible/can/may." The primary factor being that in studies ON humans these harmful effects HAVE occurred in prevalence.
Like i say if its conclusive, and They have PROVEN it... why the ambiguatory verbage? Why not seal it tight with definitive verbage, that spells it out as Evidentry ,conclusive data? like the federal Government ALWAYS does?
Because it isnt evidentry, or conclusive, it states that these possibilities Exist ...and at some point in time, somehwere, they may have actually happened...It does not support the claim, that it is a harmful substance, it supports the theory....... that IT MAY be a HARMFUL substance
The study where people were given THC PO or if they smoked it, it's not really that different. The active agent exists in both manner of ingestion. It's metabolized the same way by the body.
it does matter completly....the reasons for this are obvious .and as well, they convieniently skip ove,r what dosage was given....what was in the pill, other than THC . and the concentration levels of an ingested thc dosage are COMPLETLY different. As well anyone who has been at this as long as I have ,Knows the HUGE difference between eating marijuana, or marijauana based cookies ,cakes, etc is Entirely a different High, and entirely a different situation. Eating anything containing THC, is far MORE powerful on the Body ...Anyone who has eaten pot brownies, cookies, etc, or space cakes, made with hashish Knows they are far MORE potent, in the active High, and symptoms...,
so first of all by INGESTING this anonymous pill, which we know nothing about its dosage ,what else it may have contained etc,.......we already know the effects will be more powerfull than smoking several Joints, this is proven and documented....and as well I through personal experience, know this to be a fact
If THC causes psychosis in those tests, then THC ingested via smoking any form of the drug that contains THC will assert the same effects.
[color]Not necessarily, as FAR MORE pot would need to be smoked, to get anywhere NEAR the same type of dosage, and even then, as i stated above smoking, and ingesting marijuana are COMPLETLY DIFFERENT.........Neither you, or NIDA, or anyone else has provided hard documented facts, on the so-called psycosis .....i say its what is known as being STONED....... not psycosis at all...,
i await the PROOF on this aspect as well ,
and am interested in wht the psycosis defenitions were, for the reported case? this information, as well as dosage are completly releveant, and convieniently left out of the report[/color]
The proof exists you just exhibit a rather high amount of cognitive bias that doesn't allow you see the evidence for what it is. This argument is boring me since you refuse to accept any data that is availible.
Not so boring as you just keep on posting...
and continue to ignore my repeated requests for something of a hard factual nature???so far you have YET to provide it...Not even the NIDA report is conclusive? why is that? because thy are not being honest thats why
You issue arguments when you feel the data can be pigeonholed, but if it cannot you tend to digress to a conspiracy theory about the data. You contend that NIDA is federally funded so any seemingly obvious facts are to not be believed due to the fact the government has a hand in it. Your constant chiding of the Coulds and Possiblys is tiring.
NIDA hasnt met the burden of proof either???? the Federal Government is exactly why Marijuana is Prohibited they know the truth ....they are the ones who started the Lies in 1937 you seem to ignore the facts surrounding Prohibition of hemp and marijuana ...for if you understood the who and why ,you would understand the questionability of NIDA reprt
Not to mention The US FEDERAL GOVT will NOT ALLOW testing in this country, and havent for some years? how can they be so conclusive, when they dont allow it to be studied???[color]
If tests don't show 100% repeatable results every single time with every single subject, then it has to be "could," otherwise it would simply be bad science. I'm still trying to figure this anger thing out with you. You've got so much hostility. Where's that coming from.
I have no Hostility in this thread? not in the last 4 pages? are you referring to another thread in another section? yes i believe you are.....when you have provided me with some HARD factual evidence that is actually suppoerted and written to show such then Ill concede if its reputable and documented ............
you can show me all the Erroneous Data you can find as i stated many times before Im a 30+ year testament ....that proves that these Inconclusive allegations are nothing more than that allegations .....