Why should we accept the word of looters and liars when they claim the reason they adamantly oppose investigations into voting fraud is because there supposedly is no evidence of fraud that should prompt investigations to look for fraud.
Why should we accept the word of looters and liars when they claim the reason they adamantly oppose investigations into voting fraud is because there supposedly is no evidence of fraud that should prompt investigations to look for fraud.
you don't have to "accept" anything, legal *****.
you have to produce credible evidence there is a problem.
that's how life, and our legal system, works.
things are based on facts, not feelings lol
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.