She can still vote democrat

[mark francis]

Because that's not how courts work you must truly be a legal ***** to keep repeating that point

Lawmakers have made abortion illegal but judges and courts do not recognize that lawmaking process and make up their own rules and laws contrary to the US Constitution. Likewise, courts that recognize the reality of voter fraud and do not move to disprove it demonstrate that they want Democrats to win the election by fraud if that is what it takes. No matter how many bent courts and judges approve of voter fraud, it is still wicked and extremely destructive to American Constitutional rights and freedom.

 

[pjmret]

Lawmakers have made abortion illegal but judges and courts do not recognize that lawmaking process and make up their own rules and laws contrary to the US Constitution. Likewise, courts that recognize the reality of voter fraud and do not move to disprove it demonstrate that they want Democrats to win the election by fraud if that is what it takes. No matter how many bent courts and judges approve of voter fraud, it is still wicked and extremely destructive to American Constitutional rights and freedom.

Abortion? What are you blathering about this has nothing to do with anything but it seems to be when you have nothing intelligent to say you bring up some other topic like that LOL

As far as courts none of them have recognized the validity of your so-called evidence because your so-called evidence is stupid It's hard to lose every court case like the right has done but because their evidence is so stupid they have managed that congratulations

 

[pjmret]

Lawmakers have made abortion illegal but judges and courts do not recognize that lawmaking process and make up their own rules and laws contrary to the US Constitution. Likewise, courts that recognize the reality of voter fraud and do not move to disprove it demonstrate that they want Democrats to win the election by fraud if that is what it takes. No matter how many bent courts and judges approve of voter fraud, it is still wicked and extremely destructive to American Constitutional rights and freedom.

Not a single court-approved of voter fraud that's just an incredibly stupid thing to say period you know if you lose 1 or 2 cases maybe you've ran into a bias judge but republicans lost over 60 cases all over the country that's not a question of bias judges that's a question of stupid lawsuits with no credible evidence and claiming and whining about bias judges in this case just make you look incredibly stupid just a little helping hint for me to help you in the future no need to thank me

 

[mark francis]

Abortion? What are you blathering about this has nothing to do with anything but it seems to be when you have nothing intelligent to say you bring up some other topic like that LOL

As far as courts none of them have recognized the validity of your so-called evidence because your so-called evidence is stupid It's hard to lose every court case like the right has done but because their evidence is so stupid they have managed that congratulations

You said it yourself. Courts do not disprove voter fraud. All the courts that were presented evidence of fraud declined to publicly examine the evidence in court, proving they saw no profit in exposing the crime if it did occur, which it did.

 

[mark francis]

Not a single court-approved of voter fraud that's just an incredibly stupid thing to say period you know if you lose 1 or 2 cases maybe you've ran into a bias judge but republicans lost over 60 cases all over the country that's not a question of bias judges that's a question of stupid lawsuits with no credible evidence and claiming and whining about bias judges in this case just make you look incredibly stupid just a little helping hint for me to help you in the future no need to thank me

Refusing to examine the clear evidence of fraud in court just proves the courts decided to blindly accept the Democrat claims for whatever reason.

 

[pjmret]

Refusing to examine the clear evidence of fraud in court just proves the courts decided to blindly accept the Democrat claims for whatever reason.

you can prove they refused to examine the evidence? no? of course they did. they said directly they did. duh
you realize that your constant lies just make you look like a hateful, ignorant jerk, right?

 

[mark francis]

you can prove they refused to examine the evidence? no? of course they did. they said directly they did. duh
you realize that your constant lies just make you look like a hateful, ignorant jerk, right?

Everybody knows no court tried the evidence of massive fraud in open court.

 

[pjmret]

Everybody knows no court tried the evidence of massive fraud in open court.

Sure they did try it in open court anyone who isn't a legal ***** knows that

You mean with a jury? These cases don't go to juries everyone who isn't a legal ***** knows that

You are clearly a legal *****

 

[mark francis]

Sure they did try it in open court anyone who isn't a legal ***** knows that

You mean with a jury? These cases don't go to juries everyone who isn't a legal ***** knows that

You are clearly a legal *****

You have no clue what courts decided since you seem stuck on the idea that courts disproved voter fraud, which no court ever did.

 

[pjmret]

You have no clue what courts decided since you seem stuck on the idea that courts disproved voter fraud, which no court ever did.

You keep saying that about me and I keep telling you that you are a liar
God hates your lies
Why do you want to look like a hateful liar?