EU told her to go away.
She is making herself look even more stupid by trying to do this; we all know she will do what she can do make Scotland independent, but Scotland alone will be very poor.
The EU doesn't need Scotland, and Scotland is part of the UK, therefore she has to try and leave the UK first. The Scots voted to stay a part of the UK, so again, why another referendum? Suddenly people want them all of the time and the Scots hadn't had one for centuries.
Good luck to her legal advisors to finding a loophole, but ask the Scots a different question; remain in the EU alone or within the UK? Most won't want it to be alone, because they will have pay the EU out of their own pocket.
Now the remain campaign is saying that Trident is another nail in the coffin for Scotland and if the UK passes the bill to update it's nuclear weapons programme, then that will be another factor why the people of Scotland will want to leave the UK as it's and I quote "one of the most important things that the majority of Scottish people don't want".
Well I know a lot of Scottish people and I have to say that I don't actually know one of them that would put Trident as an important factor in wanting to leave the UK, so I'm not sure who she is referring to when she says "the majority".
I don't think it would escalate to the point of military action towards Scotland. I think there are some people in England who would prefer Scotland not to be a part of Great Britain. I don't think they would hold on very tightly to Scotland. Of course this isn't everyone, just some.I think that ultimately, Scotland being a part of the EU would be more beneficial to them than just being a part of GB as a whole. England can afford to be on its own, but Scotland seems to get an unfair shake economically and support wise being a part of GB, especially if it means they have to be excluded from the EU entirely to do so. Does anyone think that GB will put up a huge fuss letting go of Scotland? Do you think it could even escalate into military action?
I don't think it would escalate to the point of military action towards Scotland. I think there are some people in England who would prefer Scotland not to be a part of Great Britain. I don't think they would hold on very tightly to Scotland. Of course this isn't everyone, just some.
I see no reason why Scotland and England should be joined. However, I think the desire for independence has always been stronger in Ireland than Scotland. Ultimately, the joining of Scotland, Wales, Ireland, and England was nothing more than plain old imperalism from the start. What could be some possible reasons why the nations would want to be joined, apart from economic reasons?
Economic reasons says it all, basically because Wales, Scotland, and N. Ireland know they need the economic infrastructure. Independence means that people will be poorer, there will be no welfare assistance, free education, free healthcare, social housing. Isn't that enough to make them want to stay?
That's the same reason Puerto Rico, the Northern Marianas, and possibly Hawaii stay with the US. On a base level, the people in those lands view white and black Americans as foreigners. Nonetheless, there are way too many benefits to be lost to possibly leave.
Many people complain about empire, but honestly a lot of ordinary people as well as corporations benefit heavily from imperialism. Actually, people in the lands I mentioned are often the most patriotic because the ties to the US has given them so much opportunity.
Don't forget, they have what oil there is.Scotland couldn't survive without England.
The EU commission has already said they wouldn't accept Scotland without England as they have nothing to give back to the EU.
Sturgeon is like a annoying little lapdog that won't shut up - if they are Scottish MP's - they should stay in Scotland.
I hope they do leave England - lets see where:
Please leave.
- The money comes from - thats English money the Sterling (we'll have that back)
- If free prescriptions still run