DR. again my answer is I don't know, We have never been here before...JOBS JOBS & JOBS.. I just don't see where they going to come from..What if we look back at what has worked in the past and conserve those beneficial things from the past?
DR. again my answer is I don't know, We have never been here before...JOBS JOBS & JOBS.. I just don't see where they going to come from..What if we look back at what has worked in the past and conserve those beneficial things from the past?
Here's a start:DR. again my answer is I don't know, We have never been here before...JOBS JOBS & JOBS.. I just don't see where they going to come from..
Private sector job creation continued at a healthy clip in December, with companies adding a better-than-expected 238,000 positions despite the inclement weather.
ADP and Moody's Analytics said the month was the best for 2013 and pointed towards a solid number when the government releases its nonfarm payrolls report Friday.
Its a start.. But remember 10 years ago 275 thousand didn't even keep up with the population growth..and now 238 thousand is a good number.. BUT the construction numbers were better then I thought..
A start is all it is. There is a long way to go yet before the recession can be deemed to be over.Its a start.. But remember 10 years ago 275 thousand didn't even keep up with the population growth..and now 238 thousand is a good number.. BUT the construction numbers were better then I thought..
The MSM is full of it and every normal thinking American knows this. At least 262,000 jobs each month need to be created just to break even.
238,000 jobs is still a net loss of 24,000 jobs. But, the real tell tale of jobs is that 91 million Americans are not working. Recovery my as$.
You can continue to post the BS from the MSM PLC1, but it doesn't make it so.
It is not a start ..... it is another month of job loss!
Why 100,000 jobs a month won't lower unemployment rate
The US has averaged about 100,000 new jobs a month for eight months. Good, right? Well, the US is growing, and 100,000 jobs aren't enough for the new people coming into the workforce.
That's exactly what I am saying. The 238,000 "new" jobs created is still a net loss.Not acco
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2010/0903/Why-100-000-jobs-a-month-won-t-lower-unemployment-rateNot according to the Christian Science Monitor:
Um...100,000 < 238,000 every time.That's exactly what I am saying. The 238,000 "new" jobs created is still a net loss.
But, again, the reality is that 92 million Americans are out of work due to Obama's policies.