Question for democrats

Werbung:
thats like a good litte democrat who preaches fairness and tolerance but hate religion he got every right to be .
Your being incorrect again (psst: use ChatGPT). I don’t hate square dancing, astrology for fun, or trigonometry either. But none of those have a place on a politics forum.

Can’t you make a more coherent argument? Can’t you agree on an even no-partisan non-political matter? Is everything team sport for you?
 
Here, from ChatGPT:

Allowing religion in a political forum can foster a deeper understanding of diverse perspectives and values. Here are several arguments in favor:

1. Cultural Relevance: Religion significantly shapes many individuals’ values, ethics, and worldviews. Excluding it from political discourse can overlook important cultural factors influencing policy and governance.

2. Moral Framework: Many political beliefs are rooted in moral or ethical frameworks derived from religious teachings. Including religious perspectives can enhance discussions about justice, equality, and human rights.

3. Community Engagement: Religious communities often mobilize around political issues, advocating for social change and civic responsibility. Their involvement can enrich democratic participation and community-building.

4. Historical Context: Throughout history, religion has played a crucial role in shaping political movements and ideologies. Recognizing this connection can provide valuable insights into current events and political climates.

5. Pluralism: A diverse society benefits from open dialogue that includes all perspectives. Encouraging religious expression in political forums promotes pluralism and mutual respect among different belief systems.

6. Critical Thinking: Engaging with religious arguments can challenge participants to critically analyze their own beliefs and assumptions, leading to more robust discussions and informed decision-making.

Incorporating religion into political discourse, when approached respectfully, can enhance the democratic process by ensuring that a variety of voices and experiences are represented.
 
Marx had no experience at trying to run any government, and what he proposed was unworkable. Actually putting Marxism into practice was Lenin's job and he died before he could get the Soviet system working. Of course, the Russian Empire was huge, was mostly underdeveloped, and had been recently defeated in the war with Germany and Austria-Hungary and civil wars. Marx was German and Germans tend to do as they are told. Russians are far less obedient.

The Chinese have been most successful at running an entire country, by using capitalism as a tool for development. The Chinese have never been more prosperous than they are today.

No matter who runs China, the fact is that each citizen is only one of 1.4 billion people.
Income distribution in China is far more widely spread around than in the US. There are also more people incarcerated in the USA percentage wise than there are in China.

Would I prefer to live in China? No, I wouldn't, but am not Chinese.

Life is far more difficult, dangerous and short in many countries than it is in China. Annoying is ignorant and knows very little.
The ungodly have a long history of leadership failures.
 
Only a ***** would deny terror suspects have came into the nation and be ok with it.
O y the way If you could read you would maybe have seen wherI don't care if they are Muslim Christian black Indian Jehovah witness or Islamic terrorist .Maybe you have heard of this group of 400 joe let in they ere called ISIS awhile back.And there were many others

absolutely nothing to do with my comment , that he is obviously hiding from. because facts always get in the way of this scum.
 
The plan was to pass the bipartisan immigration bill. But Trump said no, and he forced the sheep in the GOP to refuse to even put it to a vote.
any bill they will come up with now will be way more weak then the one they proposed. These people are so fucking stupid. TRump can't do shit about the problem , He had title 42 which is a long standing immigration law that is only effective during Covid or something like that. Of course the courts have stopped it. when Covid became way less of a threat. You dumb fucks can do nothing about immigrants asking for asylum.
 
any bill they will come up with now will be way more weak then the one they proposed. These people are so fucking stupid. TRump can't do shit about the problem , He had title 42 which is a long standing immigration law that is only effective during Covid or something like that. Of course the courts have stopped it. when Covid became way less of a threat. You dumb fucks can do nothing about immigrants asking for asylum.
Democrats despise Americans who want our borders closed like they were under Trump.
 
Werbung:
Trumps policies www criminal imo but I want the border while allowing for legal asylum seekers.
There is many many federal laws and treaty's that we are signers of that protect asylum seekers at our borders from the hate Nazi Right wing. They are a party of hate that needs to blame others or anything to explain their feeling of failure as a person. Their biggest failure to start with is belonging to the Hate Nazi Group called MAGA. Supporting a rapist lying criminal who is cruel ugly and mean. The worst human in the world. He was for years the most hated man in the world. He probably is now again. the man is total scum.
 
Back
Top