ThisTooShallPass
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2011
- Messages
- 168
I don't think many people reject those two arguments.
The difference between (what appears to be ) your beliefs and those arguments is that you attribute the image of a CHRISTIAN God, and that only to those arguments.
If one believe in the unmoved mover, it certainly doesn't mean one must believe in the literal world of the Bible, the New Testament, or that ONLY a religion recognizing the Christian God is correct.
In fact, I would argue that such a belief would be a limitation on the unmoved mover argument.
I do not and have never attributed anything more to those arguments than what they are: logical proofs for the existence of a single, omnipotent God.
There are other reasons to accept the Christian narrative of the nature of that God, but they are dry and historical; numerous books have been written about them.