vyo476
Well-Known Member
Classic atheist reasoning - "all religious people are extremists." I'm from Massachusetts. I live down the street from a Catholic church. There's an Eastern Orthodox a few miles away. At school in New Hampshire there's a Presbyterian church that's within a stone's throw of the dormitory. None of these people are extremists. I've visited several of the states in the so-called "Bible-Belt" and while they are more given to wearing their religions on their sleeves. When they asked me if I'd accepted Jesus Christ as my personal savior I said that I hadn't and that was that.If subtle, nuanced religion dominated the world, it would be a better place and I would not be here arguing. The sad truth is that decent, understated religion is numerically negligible. Most believers echo Robertson, Falwell or Haggard, Osama bin Laden or Ayatollah Khomeini. These are not straw men. The world needs to face them.
Yes, there are extremists. But they get a lot more press because they're more interesting than the more populous, quietly religious masses. What's going to make a headline: "Muslim Extremists Set Off Car Bomb, Kill 8" or "50 Attend Church, Sermon Delivered, Much Praying"?
Furthermore, it seems that The atheists among us are too ready to just sit back and allow society to give special respect to faith, and it goes along with society’s bad habit of labelling small children with the religion of their parents. You’d never speak of a “Marxist child” or a “Captilist child”. So why give religion a free pass to indoctrinate helpless children? There is no such thing as a Christian child: only a child of Christian parents.
Trying to take away a person's faith is rather like trying to take away a person's alcohol. Maybe they'd be better off without it (emphasis on maybe) but how do you suppose they feel? Prohibiting alcohol incensed the drinking population of the United States; a similar prohibition on religion would be even worse.