Politics

FourthHorseman

New Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
2
There are so many bad people in the world. People just want to antagonize others and rule them to their suiting; vendetta’s that are made when sin is controlling the being. People dislike for unjust reasons and don’t give the time to consider true quality; to intuit the deemed person. They can’t provide for needs when the person is not amiable and social; they digress from this type of person; the philosopher that goes inward because politics are too petty. Politics have become petty though, and are deprived of their nature to change society for the better. Sectoring out is what the common class has done, because the government does not reveal enough to them. There is not enough revealed. People do away with their type, what is offered, to conceal their benefit, to rid themselves of a public morality. Friendship is valued, but people are selective to their preferences; what makes them feel greater, is where they incline themselves normally, not therefrom the moral decision. They don’t support the needful case, and provide for it for there are increments involved that are not suitable to them. They can’t enjoy them, so all candor is lost. Self-deceit in not liking the philosopher exists; to talk about something meaningful becomes like a pervasion, but the boundaries of the normal are negative and pervasive. Halting one’s means to just live, but not take part in the evolution of society and its progression; to refrain from developing the self to that point of political reconciliation for thenceforward, they would be too often enhanced. The government protects against it? The bad sense of protect; to benefit the sustenance of poor emotion. To protect oneself against virtue, to restore power that is exclusive. Once again, an oligarchy that is webbed out and numerous has wrought us to compelling tendencies, to bring them around, but we are too weak now to overcome? We can’t befit ourselves to their exclusive branch of governance, so we stand opposed to it. We relate in opposition, and don’t get a normal response. The emotions are weakly contrived by unnatural mind, and it seems but a lack in reality. A lack! What can we do to defend ourselves against this lack; this inharmonious lack, yet they have unity amongst themselves. Their friendships aren’t that close because of the bad. Good makes them liked for the moment (not profoundly though), but they have been judged as unworthy, and their friends spent time judging them in accusation. To rid the world of this bad illusion of personality; determining action that goes against the good is like a mockery of personality; it doesn’t coincide with the meaning, but these are people basely. Their uniqueness is dwindled in uniform tendencies; they make no stance of justice, and become something that doesn’t pertain to our interest; the common good is fought. Power is what is sought, to politically sustain, but not yet to change the self. We are irked by this negligence to cooperate, and do the righteous thing. Righteousness has become a difficulty, for the masses have not had the outlook that it is wanted, so they can what? Subsist!? For goodness sake, these people are the majority, but they form in a minor way and we can’t join them for there is no congruity in their motive to just enjoy and ours, to develop and progress the world. A challenged position is what is begotten. We can’t train their minds, nor lead them to becoming good without their self-involvement, their denial of the will to be bad. Badness in its stalemated understanding has caused them to whittle away time talking about politics not fostered by the core. We can’t undervalue the multitude though, despite their disgrace, for we warrant their approval. We need them as friends; welcoming friends that support us when we are weak and there is no outlet. To give, and make an effort for regular meeting is what has confronted these so called officials, but they regress from this till it is made objectively evident as necessary and profitable to their ego; the vice of their ego, regarding themselves, when they regard us, prior foils their logic. How can their peaceful principle be prompted, to make them join us, and consider our depth as greater than their superficiality so we can replace them. Revamped government again! To restore power to the masses, so they don’t segregate out, but find themselves at liberty to help. Fulfill their enervated nature. They are intuited sometimes as insignificant, as poorly refined ethically, and as negligent to the popularity of the true aim they despise; the duty to switch the ruling caste out and get rules out of the way of free lifestyle so people can form parties. Party our virtue and don’t conceal your attention, your presence, your attendant disguise. A gap between the elite and the prosperous commons, that have wealth enough to engage in friendship and have new experience is noted, but calling them prosperous is disparaged or bold. We want to empower someone, but people can’t support something they didn’t form; they neglect the necessary to be reformed by another due to their autonomy; their independence to live as they will without prerogatives that make them seem less in comparison. We developed the core to the extent that we are commonly out-smarting our fellows; they are declining in reaction to what is better than them; more moral and thus a higher value. Even our immorality is met with greater esteem then their joker attitudes. Folly has been engraved on their soul, and the profit they have is rarely viewed as adept.
 
Werbung:
There are so many bad people in the world. People just want to antagonize others and rule them to their suiting; vendetta’s that are made when sin is controlling the being. People dislike for unjust reasons and don’t give the time to consider true quality; to intuit the deemed person. They can’t provide for needs when the person is not amiable and social; they digress from this type of person; the philosopher that goes inward because politics are too petty. Politics have become petty though, and are deprived of their nature to change society for the better. Sectoring out is what the common class has done, because the government does not reveal enough to them. There is not enough revealed. People do away with their type, what is offered, to conceal their benefit, to rid themselves of a public morality. Friendship is valued, but people are selective to their preferences; what makes them feel greater, is where they incline themselves normally, not therefrom the moral decision. They don’t support the needful case, and provide for it for there are increments involved that are not suitable to them. They can’t enjoy them, so all candor is lost. Self-deceit in not liking the philosopher exists; to talk about something meaningful becomes like a pervasion, but the boundaries of the normal are negative and pervasive. Halting one’s means to just live, but not take part in the evolution of society and its progression; to refrain from developing the self to that point of political reconciliation for thenceforward, they would be too often enhanced. The government protects against it? The bad sense of protect; to benefit the sustenance of poor emotion. To protect oneself against virtue, to restore power that is exclusive. Once again, an oligarchy that is webbed out and numerous has wrought us to compelling tendencies, to bring them around, but we are too weak now to overcome? We can’t befit ourselves to their exclusive branch of governance, so we stand opposed to it. We relate in opposition, and don’t get a normal response. The emotions are weakly contrived by unnatural mind, and it seems but a lack in reality. A lack! What can we do to defend ourselves against this lack; this inharmonious lack, yet they have unity amongst themselves. Their friendships aren’t that close because of the bad. Good makes them liked for the moment (not profoundly though), but they have been judged as unworthy, and their friends spent time judging them in accusation. To rid the world of this bad illusion of personality; determining action that goes against the good is like a mockery of personality; it doesn’t coincide with the meaning, but these are people basely. Their uniqueness is dwindled in uniform tendencies; they make no stance of justice, and become something that doesn’t pertain to our interest; the common good is fought. Power is what is sought, to politically sustain, but not yet to change the self. We are irked by this negligence to cooperate, and do the righteous thing. Righteousness has become a difficulty, for the masses have not had the outlook that it is wanted, so they can what? Subsist!? For goodness sake, these people are the majority, but they form in a minor way and we can’t join them for there is no congruity in their motive to just enjoy and ours, to develop and progress the world. A challenged position is what is begotten. We can’t train their minds, nor lead them to becoming good without their self-involvement, their denial of the will to be bad. Badness in its stalemated understanding has caused them to whittle away time talking about politics not fostered by the core. We can’t undervalue the multitude though, despite their disgrace, for we warrant their approval. We need them as friends; welcoming friends that support us when we are weak and there is no outlet. To give, and make an effort for regular meeting is what has confronted these so called officials, but they regress from this till it is made objectively evident as necessary and profitable to their ego; the vice of their ego, regarding themselves, when they regard us, prior foils their logic. How can their peaceful principle be prompted, to make them join us, and consider our depth as greater than their superficiality so we can replace them. Revamped government again! To restore power to the masses, so they don’t segregate out, but find themselves at liberty to help. Fulfill their enervated nature. They are intuited sometimes as insignificant, as poorly refined ethically, and as negligent to the popularity of the true aim they despise; the duty to switch the ruling caste out and get rules out of the way of free lifestyle so people can form parties. Party our virtue and don’t conceal your attention, your presence, your attendant disguise. A gap between the elite and the prosperous commons, that have wealth enough to engage in friendship and have new experience is noted, but calling them prosperous is disparaged or bold. We want to empower someone, but people can’t support something they didn’t form; they neglect the necessary to be reformed by another due to their autonomy; their independence to live as they will without prerogatives that make them seem less in comparison. We developed the core to the extent that we are commonly out-smarting our fellows; they are declining in reaction to what is better than them; more moral and thus a higher value. Even our immorality is met with greater esteem then their joker attitudes. Folly has been engraved on their soul, and the profit they have is rarely viewed as adept.
NO comment?
 
Sure, I'll comment ... your rambling is disjointed and confusing. I've read it three times, and I'm not sure what you are trying to say.
 
Politics have nothing to do with making society better. Never was. Such rhetoric is used to make you feel better about being taxed. Decades of such piffle have nit made society anything but poorer. Flowery language does not conceal reality.
 
Sure, I'll comment ... your rambling is disjointed and confusing. I've read it three times, and I'm not sure what you are trying to say.
Brevity is the soul of wit. And the prose is more than a little bit awkward. You cant just knit just any set of big words together and make a thought.
 
fouthHorseman, While some of what you are saying make sense you have no solution. Politics is about making society better. But unless we have constant revolutions looking for a perfect party, we will have to compromise and just try to make things a little better. Perfection is impossible in this world.
 
fouthHorseman, While some of what you are saying make sense you have no solution. Politics is about making society better. But unless we have constant revolutions looking for a perfect party, we will have to compromise and just try to make things a little better. Perfection is impossible in this world.
Politics is not about making things better, its about attaining power. Govrrnment is not either. This idea is how pols look to secure votes to pursue the goals of power.
 
fouthHorseman, While some of what you are saying make sense you have no solution. Politics is about making society better. But unless we have constant revolutions looking for a perfect party, we will have to compromise and just try to make things a little better. Perfection is impossible in this world.

I think you have, unintentionally, revealed one of the great issues, and great problems, of today.

Politics is NOT about making society better. Politics is about control of the tremendous assets and power of the government. It is about increasing those assets and increasing that power and control. We must tolerate some level of politics in order to get things done, but we can't abdicate (as we have done) our responsibilities to a class only interested in feathering their own nest.

We assign altruistic values to our politicians, and then are constantly surprised when they demonstrate their human flaws and fallibility. Obama's goal is NOT to feed the poor, and provide healthcare for the masses. Those are only the vehicles by which he will advance his personal agenda of increasing his power base and assuming control of the government monolith. He is no different than any other politician, in that regard.

We, as citizens, have abdicated our responsibility of self government, and have relegated ourselves to only choosing those by whom we wish to be governed - a not so subtle difference.
 
I think you have, unintentionally, revealed one of the great issues, and great problems, of today.

Politics is NOT about making society better. Politics is about control of the tremendous assets and power of the government. It is about increasing those assets and increasing that power and control. We must tolerate some level of politics in order to get things done, but we can't abdicate (as we have done) our responsibilities to a class only interested in feathering their own nest.

We assign altruistic values to our politicians, and then are constantly surprised when they demonstrate their human flaws and fallibility. Obama's goal is NOT to feed the poor, and provide healthcare for the masses. Those are only the vehicles by which he will advance his personal agenda of increasing his power base and assuming control of the government monolith. He is no different than any other politician, in that regard.

We, as citizens, have abdicated our responsibility of self government, and have relegated ourselves to only choosing those by whom we wish to be governed - a not so subtle difference.
Thus is the difference between big government socialist sheeple and FREE THINKING Men!
 
Most Politicians I know have been of the left. They did enter Politics to make things better. Of course they had to make compromises to get elected. However I think their aims were the same. I think this applies to most who enter parliament even from the right. It is the political process that brings in evil like corruption.
 
Most Politicians I know have been of the left. They did enter Politics to make things better. Of course they had to make compromises to get elected. However I think their aims were the same. I think this applies to most who enter parliament even from the right. It is the political process that brings in evil like corruption.
Power corrupts... its a little more ingrainedin the thing than mere politucs.
 
I don't know about politics in Australia, but here, our politicians have become so corrupt, including their lap dog media, that the majority of our citizens have no idea if what they are being told is the truth, or manufactured lies presented as truth.
 
I don't know about politics in Australia, but here, our politicians have become so corrupt, including their lap dog media, that the majority of our citizens have no idea if what they are being told is the truth, or manufactured lies presented as truth.
also cant speak for the land down under but you can rest assured that everuthing pols say is manufactured and while it may contain bits of truth its anything but the truth.
 
It is true that most things a politician says is manufactured. Few politicians would tell the whole truth otherwise they would not get reelected. But the once I met Seen to be sincere in entering parliament. It is the process that causes so little truth to be told.
 
Werbung:
It is true that most things a politician says is manufactured. Few politicians would tell the whole truth otherwise they would not get reelected. But the once I met Seen to be sincere in entering parliament. It is the process that causes so little truth to be told.
Pols are basically salesmen. Its their job to appear sincere and service oriented. A used car salesman is the same.
 
Back
Top