Obamaconomy!!!

If George W Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?

Most liberals do not know BO has doubled the entire national debt in his first year. Their media outlets have not told them. But, you have and Glenn Beck does with regularity. And yet they hate Glenn Beck.

They are much more worried about the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghan.
 
Werbung:
If George W Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?

Not only do you 'BLOW CHUNKS OF STUPIDITY', here's some facts for your éclaircissement but you may need your mommy or daddy to explain the complex reasoning behind your continual confusion and total unbelievable ignorance regarding your 'MESSIAH' G.W.B. and his 8 year economic blunder!!! ;)
Read it and weep...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Walker_Bush#Presidency

Economic policy

Main article: Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration
Facing opposition in Congress, Bush held town hall-style public meetings across the U.S. in 2001 to increase public support for his plan for a $1.35 trillion tax cut program—one of the largest tax cuts in U.S. history.[42] Bush argued that unspent government funds should be returned to taxpayers, saying "the surplus is not the government’s money. The surplus is the people’s money."[42] With reports of the threat of recession from Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Bush argued that such a tax cut would stimulate the economy and create jobs.[82] Others, including the Treasury Secretary at the time Paul O'Neill, were opposed to some of the tax cuts on the basis that they would contribute to budget deficits and undermine Social Security.[83] By 2003, the economy showed signs of improvement, though job growth remained stagnant.[42]
Under the Bush Administration, real GDP grew at an average annual rate of 2.5%,[84] considerably below the average for business cycles from 1949 to 2000.[85][86] Bush entered office with the Dow Jones Industrial Average at 10,587, and the average peaked in October 2007 at over 14,000. When Bush left office, the average was at 7,949, one of the lowest levels of his presidency.[87] Unemployment originally rose from 4.2% in January 2001 to 6.3% in June 2003, but subsequently dropped to 4.5% as of July 2007.[88] Adjusted for inflation, median household income dropped by $1,175 between 2000 and 2007,[89] while Professor Ken Homa of Georgetown University has noted that "after-tax median household income increased by 2%"[90] The poverty rate increased from 11.3% in 2000 to 12.3% in 2006 after peaking at 12.7% in 2004.[91] By October 2008, due to increases in domestic and foreign spending,[92] the national debt had risen to $11.3 trillion,[93][94] an increase of over 100% from the start of the year 2000 when the debt was $5.6 trillion.[95][96] By the end of Bush's presidency, unemployment climbed to 7.2%.[97] The perception of President Bush's effect on the economy is significantly affected by partisanship.[98]
In December 2007, the United States entered the longest post-World War II recession,[99] which included a housing market correction, a subprime mortgage crisis, soaring oil prices, and a declining dollar value.[100] In February, 63,000 jobs were lost, a five-year record.[101][102] To aid with the situation, Bush signed a $170 billion economic stimulus package which was intended to improve the economic situation by sending tax rebate checks to many Americans and providing tax breaks for struggling businesses. The Bush administration pushed for significantly increased regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2003,[103] and after two years, the regulations passed the House but died in the Senate. Many Republican senators, as well as influential members of the Bush Administration, feared that the agency created by these regulations would merely be mimicking the private sector’s risky practices.[104][105] In September 2008, the crisis became much more serious beginning with the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac followed by the collapse of Lehman Brothers[106] and a federal bailout of American International Group for $85 billion.[107]
Many economists and world governments determined that the situation became the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.[108][109] Additional regulation over the housing market would have been beneficial, according to former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.[110] President Bush, meanwhile, proposed a financial rescue plan to buy back a large portion of the U.S. mortgage market.[111] Vince Reinhardt, a former Federal Reserve economist now at the American Enterprise Institute, said "it would have helped for the Bush administration to empower the folks at Treasury and the Federal Reserve and the comptroller of the currency and the FDIC to look at these issues more closely", and additionally, that it would have helped "for Congress to have held hearings".[105]
In November 2008, over 500,000 jobs were lost, which marked the largest loss of jobs in the United States in 34 years.[112] The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that in the last four months of 2008, 1.9 million jobs were lost.[113] By the end of 2008, the U.S. had lost a total of 2.6 million jobs.[114
 
The reason I believe we need to say our prayers, is because if Obamacare, Cap and Tax
and other Obama policies get implemented, then Dec 2009 will look like the good times!
17% unemployment will look good!

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?
 
The reason I believe we need to say our prayers, is because if Obamacare, Cap and Tax
and other Obama policies get implemented, then Dec 2009 will look like the good times!
17% unemployment will look good!

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?

Oh, man...what a waste of a cranium...please don't donate that brain to science or for any 'ABBYNORMAL' brain cell studies.

I'm sorry that you can't read without assistance and a comprehension instructor:(
 
* 2010 federal budget - $3.60 trillion (submitted 2009 by BO) - does not include stimulus package of $787 Billion
* 2009 federal budget - $3.10 trillion (submitted 2008 by W)
* 2001 federal budget - $1.9 trillion (submitted 2000 by Bubba)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget

I think we can agree they all spend too much. But, BO is the worst of all time.

Yeah W sucks too. Does that make you libs happy?
 
Construction and Manufacturing are getting trounced by Obama.
Yeah....that's what's happened.....

:rolleyes:
"With his public approval where President Harry Truman's stood when he left office, President Bush gave his last press conference Monday.

And like that predecessor he often identifies with, Bush showed a Trumanesque defiance of his critics - and a Trumanesque failure to understand what ruined his presidency.

He denounced protectionism, as he has with dismissive contempt since he went to New Hampshire a decade ago. But nowhere in his defense of free trade was there any explanation for how Middle America lost 3 million manufacturing jobs in his first term and a million more in the last year.

Nowhere does there seem an awareness that the ideas he absorbed at his father's knee and the Harvard Business School had resulted in the de-industrialization of his countryhttp://sfgate.info/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/13/EDLU158CNQ.DTL&hw=sunni&sn=244&sc=197, an enormous and growing dependency on Japan, China and Asia for the essentials of our national life, and, now, for the borrowed money to pay for them." - Patrick J. Buchanan, January 13, 2009

You make this tooooooooooooooooooo easy, ass-u-r.​
 
If Bush had "looked" like Obama, yes, I'm sure Shaman would have approved.
Ah, yes....that first-indicator of a (potential) "Stormfront".....skin-tone.

Nothin' superficial about you "conservatives".

With your obsession over appearances, what did you folks do in your previous-lives....as Jr. High School chickies?????

degrassi-manny-darcy.jpg


:rolleyes:
 
IF??????


:confused:

WHICH Bush?????


:confused:

Now, Now...you are going to have to STOP asking those really hard ball question of ASUR or you'll bring down the wrath of BIB upon your person and she'll SMITE you all over this forum for being 'MEAN & CRUEL' to that SPECIAL FRIEND who she deems ever so worthy of her constant support...regardless of the total ignorance that flows from his fingers;)
 
Most liberals do not know BO has doubled the entire national debt in his first year. Their media outlets have not told them. But, you have and Glenn Beck does with regularity. And yet they hate Glenn Beck.

They are much more worried about the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghan.
....And, how Lil' Dumbya managed to AVOID reflecting war-spending in his budget!!

signed_fy2008-09_war_supp_250w.jpg


:rolleyes:
 
Miss_Cleo.jpg
The reason I believe we need to say our prayers, is because if Obamacare, Cap and Tax
and other Obama policies get implemented, then Dec 2009 will look like the good times!
17% unemployment will look good!
 
Now, Now...you are going to have to STOP asking those really hard ball question of ASUR or you'll bring down the wrath of BIB upon your person and she'll SMITE you all over this forum for being 'MEAN & CRUEL'.........

gop-cry-baby.jpg


*

Yeah.....my guilt is overwhelming.....

:rolleyes:

*

3-27-08tax2-f2.jpg
 
"The Obama administration plans to announce this week that it is slashing its estimate of the losses from the government's financial bailout package by about $200 billion, Treasury officials said.

The White House had projected in August that the $700 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, would lose about $341 billion over the next 10 years. But officials scaled back the estimate after once-shaky Wall Street firms began recovering much more quickly than expected. In addition, several TARP initiatives have been funded at a smaller amount than originally planned.

Since the TARP became law in October 2008, banks have paid dividends and interest of about $15 billion and returned aid worth a total of about $71 billion, a Treasury official said Monday. Last week, Bank of America said it would soon repay an additional $45 billion. Another $139 billion of TARP funds was never allocated to any programs.

Treasury officials said they now expect bank repayments to reach $175 billion by the end of next year.

The new, more optimistic estimates of TARP losses could pave the way for Democrats to tap some of the program's un$pent fund$ for a jobs bill currently being crafted in the House. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Friday that President Obama is likely to discuss such a plan during a speech Tuesday at the Brookings Institution. The administration is facing pressure to address the nation's soaring unemployment rate -- currently at 10 percent, near a 26-year high."

92.gif
 
"Citigroup has until December 14 or December 15 to start a capital-raising effort, after which the bank would have to likely wait until late January, after it reports quarterly results, the paper said, citing unnamed sources.

The report said the short window for a decision on the repayment of funds raises the stakes for the bank in its quest to free itself from the shackles of the U.S. government.

A U.S. Treasury Department official on Sunday night wouldn't confirm any specific discussions with Citigroup but noted that other banks have stepped forward since Bank of America's announcement last week that it was paying back $45 billion in bailout money it got from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

Bank of America sold more than $19 billion of equity on Thursday to raise money to help repay its bailout funds and Citigroup likely would want to follow a similar route.

Banks are eager to repay their bailout money in order to free themselves from government-set pay restrictions that they fear make them less competitive in relation to banks that have already exited the TARP program.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has also said that he prefers to see banks raise capital on their own rather than rely on the government and anticipates that the TARP program can soon be switched from propping up banks to helping small business create more jobs."

92.gif


*

rushcry.jpg


Cheer-up, Porky. You've still got your Viagra & Thailand.​
 
Werbung:
Looks like the "Fightin' Romneys" have come-up-for-air (outta their "bunker").​

"Mitt Romney is asked what he thinks the Obama administration needs to do to stimulate the economy and surprise, surprise...he recommends more tax cuts. How'd those tax cuts work out under George W. Bush Mitt? Of course Romney also thinks we need to get rid of the stimulus plan which wasn't big enough in the first place. Let the private sector take care of everything. It will all work out just fine."

Whew!!!!

I surely hope no o' his sons has done anything crazy...like joining the U.S. Military!!!!

There's a really-good chance (apparently) that their Country will be CALLING THEM, AGAIN, soon!!!!

*

 
Back
Top