New Jersey the communist state

lawmakers are ridiculous which was what the post in question spoke to.
So the lawmakers themselves are ridiculous but the laws they make are not? o_O

this law upon further examination seems aimed at interaction between vehicles and people texting or other activities that prevent them from being aware of their surroundings.
Such laws are superfluous and encroach on our rights.

just walking down the sidewalk is just a matter of rudeness.
Huh?

The Texting "ban" they are trying to pass here in Ohio is designed as a "secondary" offense, meaning that you have to be pulled over and/or be ticketed for a primary offense before a citation for texting can be issued. So if this law passes, it will not be illegal to text while driving but you can be cited for texting while driving IF you break some other law in the process. While such laws are sold to the public as an effort to keep the roads safe, in reality such laws are nothing more than PR stunts with the added bonus of revenue enhancement.
 
Werbung:
So the lawmakers themselves are ridiculous but the laws they make are not? o_O

sometimes yes, sometimes no


Such laws are superfluous and encroach on our rights.


I appreciate that is your position

Huh?

The Texting "ban" they are trying to pass here in Ohio is designed as a "secondary" offense, meaning that you have to be pulled over and/or be ticketed for a primary offense before a citation for texting can be issued. So if this law passes, it will not be illegal to text while driving but you can be cited for texting while driving IF you break some other law in the process. While such laws are sold to the public as an effort to keep the roads safe, in reality such laws are nothing more than PR stunts with the added bonus of revenue enhancement.

the one in Jersey has you getting nailed for jaywalking and if you were texting so much the worse, its not on the driver. it does benefit the driver should he hit someone as that pedestrian was not practicing reasonable care. it might just keep you out of jail.

the ohio one is pretty lame but likely all they could get passed. I think VA may have had one as secondary but upgraded it this year.
 
revenues pay for extra police presence to reduce your chances of getting mugged

Thats why i want corperate taxes. Make the CEOs pay extra on their income tax. Its like this.. You make $800,000 a year ok? Not only you pay 34% to the IRS youll pay an extra 10% called CEO Excutive tax and youll pay a total 44% to the IRS Plus states add another 10% CEO Excutive tax. So there they can pay the police to protect us.
 
Thats why i want corperate taxes. Make the CEOs pay extra on their income tax. Its like this.. You make $800,000 a year ok? Not only you pay 34% to the IRS youll pay an extra 10% called CEO Excutive tax and youll pay a total 44% to the IRS Plus states add another 10% CEO Excutive tax. So there they can pay the police to protect us.

except that they will reduce their salary and get compensated in different ways that are not taxed. they already do this, they'll just do it more. raising taxes only works on the middle class. the lower class doesn't pay tax.
 
Thats why i want corperate taxes. Make the CEOs pay extra on their income tax. Its like this.. You make $800,000 a year ok? Not only you pay 34% to the IRS youll pay an extra 10% called CEO Excutive tax and youll pay a total 44% to the IRS Plus states add another 10% CEO Excutive tax. So there they can pay the police to protect us.
Steve it matters not how you portray yourself to be a conservative ....
You're comments reveal the true socialist pig that you are ...

Please forgive my "personal attack" ....
It's really not personal ... it's political ....
 
Im Republican ok,,, I want the spending limited. I want Taxes cut for people making under $100,000 a year. Pe0ple who have a lot of money dont rely on the police protecting them. They have their own security. Look at Jay Leno,,Hes a millonare and he has his own security. So does Bill OReily he has his own security guys around him. People like u and i have to rely on the police. So therefor the Rich should pay to protect people like us.
 
Im Republican ok,,, I want the spending limited. I want Taxes cut for people making under $100,000 a year. Pe0ple who have a lot of money dont rely on the police protecting them. They have their own security. Look at Jay Leno,,Hes a millonare and he has his own security. So does Bill OReily he has his own security guys around him. People like u and i have to rely on the police. So therefor the Rich should pay to protect people like us.
Karl Marx wasn't a Republican.
 
that pedestrian was not practicing reasonable care.
You know what a slippery slope is... Why are you not concerned that laws intentionally written with subjective language will continue to slide down the slope at the expense of our liberty? If I'm not practicing "reasonable" care, then I'm the one who gets hurt as a result, and if that's the case, what business is it of anyone else? Should I damage another individual's person or property as a result of not practicing "reasonable" care, then there are already laws to hold me accountable for my actions.

It saddens me that so many people eagerly agree to surrender our liberties for the promise of increased safety.
 
Im not like a Karl Marx.
"To each according to his needs, from each according to his ability." - Marx

Do you know what that means Steve? It means rich people should be forced to provide for the material needs of everyone who isn't rich. Anything you need in life, some rich guy would have to pay for... Your home, food, clothing, healthcare, etc. Is that the kind of system you want in America?

Let me ask you this,,What kind of government is Canada?
Social Democracy... A gradual, as opposed to a revolutionary, form of Marxism. Why do you ask?
 
Let me ask yall this ok? How does it feel you heard that Mitt Romney paid only 15% to the IRS the rest of us paid 22% - 34% Dont you all feel outraged by this? Its been known Rich people get a free ride in life while the rest of us have to manage our budgets. Just like NBC Chief excutive paid no taxes. The OWS protests are happening for a reason. Can anyone tell me why 99% are so upset with the 1%?
 
Let me ask yall this ok? How does it feel you heard that Mitt Romney paid only 15% to the IRS the rest of us paid 22% - 34% Dont you all feel outraged by this?

Outraged? Don't you mean jealous?

The OWS protests are happening for a reason. Can anyone tell me why 99% are so upset with the 1%?

The OWS "protest" are happening because the White House has organized a bunch of brainless drug addicted thugs who don't want to work to go out and attempt to create chaos. Paid for by George Soros. And, I am thinking it is not the 99%'er's. It's 1% of the lazy idiots in this Country claiming to represent 99%!
 
How does it feel you heard that Mitt Romney paid only 15% to the IRS

I make decisions based on reason, not emotion.

the rest of us paid 22% - 34%

You would have to be making 150k/yr to have an effective tax rate of 22%, do you really make that much Steve? If you're paying a tax rate of 34%, then you're making over 10,000,000/yr - That's ten million.

Dont you all feel outraged by this?

I feel saddened by the fact that people like you are being fed a pack of lies and believe it without question.

Its been known Rich people get a free ride in life while the rest of us have to manage our budgets.

50% of Americans pay NO federal income tax, they are the ones getting a free ride.

Can anyone tell me why 99% are so upset with the 1%?

Texas Tea is correct, they aren't representative of 99% of the population, they represent a minority of people who are useful idiots.​
 
Let me ask yall this ok? How does it feel you heard that Mitt Romney paid only 15% to the IRS the rest of us paid 22% - 34% Dont you all feel outraged by this? Its been known Rich people get a free ride in life while the rest of us have to manage our budgets. Just like NBC Chief excutive paid no taxes. The OWS protests are happening for a reason. Can anyone tell me why 99% are so upset with the 1%?

I paid 11% so poor Mitt for getting nailed. Hardly a free ride. Only lower classes pay all the marginal tax rate due to deductions. Ask Obama why he's OK with that.
 
Werbung:
The rich people do get a free ride but it is not in the tax rate. The gov pretends to hit them harder with a higher rate but then gives them all sorts of privilege that the rest of us do not even have the opportunity to get. The rich come out ahead when the tax rate goes up. We need a system that taxes everybody at the same rate and also gives everybody equal access to the same privilege.

The jaywalking law is ridiculous and that is the evidence that the lawmakers are also ridiculous. the purpose of all these laws about disracted driving, walking, etc seems to be the expansion of gov power rather than the feigned protection of idiots.

Yes, CEO's would just avoid a special tax aimed at them. Yes it would be a clear example,but only on the books, of discrimination against a certain set of people, i.e. CEO's. And yes it would be a smokescreen designed to benefit the CEO's and the lawmakers at the expense of the rest of us.
 
Back
Top