Mike Johnson; Trippin' Over His Dick, ALREADY!!!!!

Denying facts does not disprove them.

Dominion Voting Machine Flaws -- 2020 Election Coffee County, Georgia Video 1 - YouTube

Video reveals that election official can change votes on adjudicated ballots with no problem.

let me know when you have proof they DID change votes. duh.

you idiots seem not to understand the difference between something COULD go wrong and something DID go wrong. lol.

which is why you lost every court case, because your evidence is bs
 
Werbung:
Yeah sure and every one was a Democrat doing the fraud. How did I know that.

Several whistleblowers, unknown and un named postal worker. Is that you're evidence? Hardly evidence you would take to court.
I'll bet they were republicans like and just as big of liars.
You've backed a loser and still making excuses. You're just a silly demented old man.
Courts do not change laws to prevent voter fraud, legislatures do. We need to take the evidence of fraud to Congress, like good people attempted to do on Jan 6.
 
yeah, jesse morgan claims ballots disappeared. the guy who chases ghosts because they are haunting him, or something. and prefilled out ballots. why is it you idiots never have any proof like, you know, a picture of a pre-filled out ballot taken with a marvelous invention that everyone carries, the cell phone? lol.

this is the reason you lost every court case. your "evidene" is BS. lol
You have your reasons for mocking evidence of fraud, but you fail to disprove the massive evidence of widespread 2020 fraud.

Bombshells undercut the 'Big Lie:' 21 confirmed illegalities, irregularities from 2020 election | Just The News

7-16-22

Alleged Bribery. The former state Supreme Court justice appointed by the Wisconsin Legislature to investigate the 2020 election concluded that millions of dollars in donations to election administrators in five Democrat-heavy municipalities from the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life violated state anti-bribery laws and corrupted election practices by turning public election authorities into liberal get-out-the-vote activists. “The Zuckerberg-funded CTCL/ Zuckerberg 5 scheme would prove to be an effective way to accomplish the partisan effort to 'turnout' their desired voters and it was done with the active support of the very people and the governmental institution (WEC) that were supposed to be guarding the Wisconsin elections administrative process from the partisan activities they facilitated,” Justice Michael Gableman wrote.
 
let me know when you have proof they DID change votes. duh.

you idiots seem not to understand the difference between something COULD go wrong and something DID go wrong. lol.

which is why you lost every court case, because your evidence is bs
Let me know how you are going to prove voting machines did not flip votes if election officials lost memory cards, voting tabulators disappeared, electronic images were destroyed, and they refuse to allow outside forensic investigators to examine the machines before workers have a chance to reprogram them.
 
Let me know how you are going to prove voting machines did not flip votes if election officials lost memory cards, voting tabulators disappeared, electronic images were destroyed, and they refuse to allow outside forensic investigators to examine the machines before workers have a chance to reprogram them.
i'm not going to prove that since I don't have to. duh
you idiots have to prove it happened and you failed.
 
You have your reasons for mocking evidence of fraud, but you fail to disprove the massive evidence of widespread 2020 fraud.

Bombshells undercut the 'Big Lie:' 21 confirmed illegalities, irregularities from 2020 election | Just The News

7-16-22

Alleged Bribery. The former state Supreme Court justice appointed by the Wisconsin Legislature to investigate the 2020 election concluded that millions of dollars in donations to election administrators in five Democrat-heavy municipalities from the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life violated state anti-bribery laws and corrupted election practices by turning public election authorities into liberal get-out-the-vote activists. “The Zuckerberg-funded CTCL/ Zuckerberg 5 scheme would prove to be an effective way to accomplish the partisan effort to 'turnout' their desired voters and it was done with the active support of the very people and the governmental institution (WEC) that were supposed to be guarding the Wisconsin elections administrative process from the partisan activities they facilitated,” Justice Michael Gableman wrote.
yes i have reasons to mock it since you couldn't convince a single judge. lol
 
Courts do not change laws to prevent voter fraud, legislatures do. We need to take the evidence of fraud to Congress, like good people attempted to do on Jan 6.
no, the jan 6 brought no evidence to congress. they stormed the building violently.

you say the dumbest things. lol
 
yes i have reasons to mock it since you couldn't convince a single judge. lol
You know I have not spoken to a single judge, yet you continue to mock me as though nothing I say can be true because I have not convinced a single judge. How stupid is that? Really, how stupid is that?
 
no, the jan 6 brought no evidence to congress. they stormed the building violently.

you say the dumbest things. lol
Jan 6 was about American disapproval of massive 2020 voting fraud. Democrats knew they had to turn that dissent around by cooking up the lying sedition narrative, which they planned and executed to their great wicked success.
 
Jan 6 was about American disapproval of massive 2020 voting fraud. Democrats knew they had to turn that dissent around by cooking up the lying sedition narrative, which they planned and executed to their great wicked success.
No a majority of Americans didn't think that Trump was a legitimate president January 6th was about violence stirred up by Trump because his ego couldn't admit he lost
 
You know I have not spoken to a single judge, yet you continue to mock me as though nothing I say can be true because I have not convinced a single judge. How stupid is that? Really, how stupid is that?
What is truly stupid is to keep claiming there was massive fraud in a Stolen election when you couldn't convince a single judge of your evidence and it's been 3 years and you still have no credible evidence how stupid is that? Incredibly stupid
 
No a majority of Americans didn't think that Trump was a legitimate president January 6th was about violence stirred up by Trump because his ego couldn't admit he lost
Just because someone thinks something is true does not make it true.
 
What is truly stupid is to keep claiming there was massive fraud in a Stolen election when you couldn't convince a single judge of your evidence and it's been 3 years and you still have no credible evidence how stupid is that? Incredibly stupid.
Trying to disprove massive evidence of voter fraud by taking it to judges is a waste of time. Judges cannot disprove evidence of voting fraud like you claim. However, I realize you keep repeating the stupid pointless judges narrative because that is all you have.
 
Werbung:
Trying to disprove massive evidence of voter fraud by taking it to judges is a waste of time. Judges cannot disprove evidence of voting fraud like you claim. However, I realize you keep repeating the stupid pointless judges narrative because that is all you have.
i don't claim that.
i realize you keep lying and making stupid posts.
because that is all you have.
because you lost every court case because you couldn't convince a single judge your "evidence" was valid. lol
 
Back
Top