Media Bias / Fact Check: the annoying thing's WORST NIGHTMARE!

[mark francis]

Up to you to prove massive fraud *****
Which you haven't

You don't disprove the evidence of 2020 fraud and I do not prove hundreds of thousands of ballots for Biden were illegitimate. How should we proceed?

 

[mark francis]

States certified them

Which ballots? I keep asking you keep running away lol

States don't do anything, people do. However, if blue states claim Trump lost the 2020 election honestly the least those blue states could do is try to prove it.

 

[mark francis]

You have to prove it not the other way around duh

Crooks claim they do not have to prove their innocence - cops must prove their guilt or blindly accept their word that they committed no crime at all.

 

[pjmret]

You don't disprove the evidence of 2020 fraud and I do not prove hundreds of thousands of ballots for Biden were illegitimate. How should we proceed?

I will keep pointing out you lost every court case because you have no credible evidence
I have nothing to disprove
You must prove fraud or you lose
And you lost

 

[pjmret]

Crooks claim they do not have to prove their innocence - cops must prove their guilt or blindly accept their word that they committed no crime at all.

Yes innocent until proven guilty
Do you disagree?

Just like valid elections until proven fraud

 

[pjmret]

States don't do anything, people do. However, if blue states claim Trump lost the 2020 election honestly the least those blue states could do is try to prove it.

They proved it
And yes states certify their election

 

[Boris Norris]

Your twisted 'facts' are all lying leftist Democrat perversions of the truth.

That could be right but you still can't prove what you said. You're a liar and do it with the impunity of your god. You're a hypocrite.

 

[Boris Norris]

Your twisted 'facts' are all lying leftist Democrat perversions of the truth.

170 years ago, in the infancy of democracy, a small group of people rigged one ballot box.
Wow. Hardly centuries of unharnessed corruption.

I notice it never mentioned about republican corruption.

 

[Boris Norris]

https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/1856-vigilantes-changed-corrupt-political-system-5663654.php

1856 vigilantes changed corrupt political system


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the political organization.
Tammany Hall

Tammany Hall, also known as the Society of St. Tammany, the Sons of St. Tammany, or the Columbian Order, was an American political organization founded in 1786 and incorporated on May 12, 1789, as the Tammany Society. It became the main local political machine of the Democratic Party and played a major role in controlling New York City and New York State politics, and helped immigrants, most notably the Irish, rise in American politics into the 1960s. Tammany typically controlled Democratic nominations and political patronage in Manhattan after the mayoral victory of Fernando Wood in 1854, and used its patronage resources to build a loyal, well-rewarded core of district and precinct leaders; after 1850 the vast majority were Irish Catholics due to mass immigration from Ireland during and after the Irish Famine.

Here's a little bit about all the fraud that no one found. Sort of kills your ridiculous adaptions.

 

[mark francis]

I will keep pointing out you lost every court case because you have no credible evidence
I have nothing to disprove
You must prove fraud or you lose
And you lost

Crimes that are not proven in court are still crimes. Fraud that has been too hard or expensive to investigate was still fraud when it was committed.

 

[mark francis]

Yes innocent until proven guilty
Do you disagree?

Just like valid elections until proven fraud

With evidence of dead people voting, illegals voting, people voting multiple times, voting machine glitches, and so forth, claiming the 'errors' that were uncovered were all the errors that existed does not answer the many valid questions arising from multiple appearances of voting fraud. No, blindly assuming no fraud took place while refusing to thoroughly investigate the claims is not valid.

 

[mark francis]

They proved it
And yes states certify their election

Assumptions are not proof. Nobody has ever proven the hundreds of thousands of late ballots for Biden were valid in spite of the missing verification documentation that was supposed to accompany the ballots.

 

[mark francis]

170 years ago, in the infancy of democracy, a small group of people rigged one ballot box.
Wow. Hardly centuries of unharnessed corruption.

I notice it never mentioned about republican corruption.

Ignorance of the facts does not justify claims that facts do not exist.

 

[mark francis]

Here's a little bit about all the fraud that no one found. Sort of kills your ridiculous adaptions.

Emotional support for or opposition to voting fraud does not prove whether fraud occurred or did not occur. Proof requires evidence and both sides lack sufficient evidence to prove their claims. Were machines corrupted, for example? No? prove it.

 

[pjmret]

Emotional support for or opposition to voting fraud does not prove whether fraud occurred or did not occur. Proof requires evidence and both sides lack sufficient evidence to prove their claims. Were machines corrupted, for example? No? prove it.

Burden of proof is on those claiming fraud