Media Bias / Fact Check: the annoying thing's WORST NIGHTMARE!

[pjmret]

The evidence of widespread 2020 voting fraud is massive as is evidence of widespread delusion of those who cannot see the evidence.

If it was credible you would have won court cases *****
But you didn't duh

 

[pjmret]

Irrefutable proof of voter fraud requires depths of investigations that are beyond the limits of practicability, which is why Democrats continue to get away with committing voting fraud and lying about it.

Nope fraud is uncovered every election
You are a ***** lol

 

[pjmret]

The evidence is overwhelming even though no irrefutable proof was ever established in court. As the evidence of O.J.'s guilt was overwhelming yet he was not proven guilty.

If it was overwhelming and credible you would have won in court ***** in some of the many many cases duh

 

[Phoenix68]

Your judgment is extremely flawed about God and Christianity.

.

.
There's a lot-o'-that goin' around.....
.​

 

[mark francis]

Not rebels against anything. They simply don't believe there's a god. Only fools think there is.

"Really smart people' by Democrat definition who do not believe God fill our jails nationwide, while the 'fools' by Democrat definition who fear God remain among the most trustworthy and hardworking among us.

There should be no reason any religion is taught in schools. It's proven to be of no benefit and your a classic example. You haven't yet grasped reality.

 

[mark francis]

If it was credible you would have won court cases *****
But you didn't duh

The state lost the case against O.J. in spite of the massive evidence of his guilt. Voter fraud cases were lost because the evidence was rejected, not disproven.

 

[mark francis]

If it was overwhelming and credible you would have won in court ***** in some of the many many cases duh

The evidence of Hillary's guilt is overwhelming, yet she was never tried and convicted. The same is true about the overwhelming number of crooks who committed voter fraud for the Democrat party. The evidence is overwhelming, yet convictions are rare. Just because convictions are hard to obtain does not mean the crooks did not commit the crime.

 

[pjmret]

The evidence of Hillary's guilt is overwhelming, yet she was never tried and convicted. The same is true about the overwhelming number of crooks who committed voter fraud for the Democrat party. The evidence is overwhelming, yet convictions are rare. Just because convictions are hard to obtain does not mean the crooks did not commit the crime.

when you lose EVERY SINGLE COURT CASE, you can conclude either 1) no fraud occurred or 2) EVERY SINGLE JUDGE is corrupt, including republican ones. I guess you are willing to be a ***** and pick #2. lol

ps - convictions are rare? the jails are overflowing. we have the most prisoners per capita of any country i believe.

the depths of your stupidity are most amazing

 

[pjmret]

The state lost the case against O.J. in spite of the massive evidence of his guilt. Voter fraud cases were lost because the evidence was rejected, not disproven.

and you lost EVERY SINGLE COURT CASE, dozens and dozens.

and the evidence was rejected because it wasn't credible, *****. courts don't disprove submissions, they evaluate them.

god you're stupid lol

 

[mark francis]

when you lose EVERY SINGLE COURT CASE, you can conclude either 1) no fraud occurred or 2) EVERY SINGLE JUDGE is corrupt, including republican ones. I guess you are willing to be a ***** and pick #2. lol

Wrong assumption. Judges did not investigate and discover that no voter fraud occurred, they just dismissed the evidence of fraud without investigating whether fraud occurred or not.

ps - convictions are rare? the jails are overflowing. we have the most prisoners per capita of any country i believe.

the depths of your stupidity are most amazing

Yes, the prisons are full of the guilty mixed, no doubt, with small numbers of the innocent, yet massive numbers of criminals have still never been arrested and jailed for some or all of the crimes they have committed.

 

[mark francis]

and you lost EVERY SINGLE COURT CASE, dozens and dozens.

and the evidence was rejected because it wasn't credible, *****. courts don't disprove submissions, they evaluate them.

god you're stupid lol

No court has ever ruled that no fraud occurred. No court has ruled that massive fraud occurred. Courts are ill-qualified to rule on matters they have not thoroughly investigated.

 

[pjmret]

Wrong assumption. Judges did not investigate and discover that no voter fraud occurred, they just dismissed the evidence of fraud without investigating whether fraud occurred or not.

Yes, the prisons are full of the guilty mixed, no doubt, with small numbers of the innocent, yet massive numbers of criminals have still never been arrested and jailed for some or all of the crimes they have committed.

"massive numbers"? lol. vague and worthless, like you.

judges evaluated the "obvious" evidence and said it wasn't credible. you morons have no credible evidence. lol

 

[pjmret]

No court has ever ruled that no fraud occurred. No court has ruled that massive fraud occurred. Courts are ill-qualified to rule on matters they have not thoroughly investigated.

courts don't work that way *****. lol.

courts are well qualified to evaluate evidence presented to them, *****. its literally what they do...every day. including evidence from expert witnesses who would be qualified to discuss the technical aspects of a case.

and yet you morons lost EVERY SINGLE CASE.
hahahahaha
hahahah

 

[mark francis]

"massive numbers"? lol. vague and worthless, like you.

judges evaluated the "obvious" evidence and said it wasn't credible. you morons have no credible evidence. lol

Judges glanced over individual cases brought among thousands of voter fraud claims and decided to dismiss those relatively small numbers of cases for various reasons, none of which involve proof that no voter fraud occurred.

 

[pjmret]

Judges glanced over individual cases brought among thousands of voter fraud claims and decided to dismiss those relatively small numbers of cases for various reasons, none of which involve proof that no voter fraud occurred.

you can prove they ONLY "glanced over it"?
go for it, *****.
but you wont
because you are a fake christian who lies constantly. lol