Ma Nature vs. The Least Educated

[Gabriel_Bell]

Secular labs have tested dinosaur bones and certified their ages at less than 50,000 years. Evolutionists generally accept the speculation that humans have been around for 200,000 years or more. How is that not an indication that humans and dinosaurs lived during some shared time periods?

There were no humans around when T Rexes were roaming about. Can you explain how some dinosaurs coexisting with humans proves that the Book of Genesis is correct? The Bible doesn't mention T Rexes anywhere.

 

[mark francis]

There were no humans around when T Rexes were roaming about. Can you explain how some dinosaurs coexisting with humans proves that the Book of Genesis is correct? The Bible doesn't mention T Rexes anywhere.

Ignoring the Bible for a moment there is scientific evidence that dinosaurs and humans were alive on earth simultaneously in the ancient past. The reason so many people today do not know that is because leftists have for decades been scrubbing scientific evidence that contradicts their evolutionist misinterpretations of scientific data.

One famous example comes to mind. The Piltdown man was fabricated by devout evolutionists in a wicked attempt to 'prove' evolution by producing a fake 'missing link' fossil. The fossil was received and accepted for decades by millions as if it was real. Piltdown was even mentioned in transcripts of the 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial. Every 'scientific evidence' of evolution mentioned in that trial was later debunked.

How interesting that the fake Piltdown man was wickedly created in England less than 2 decades after human bones were found mixed with saber tooth tiger bones in the Cattedown Caves in England that devout evolutionists refused to acknowledge because the evidence contradicted well publicized evolutionist narratives of that day.

 

[Phoenix68]

Ignoring the Bible for a moment there is scientific evidence that dinosaurs and humans were alive on earth simultaneously in the ancient past.

.

.
Gee....lemme guess.....you just forgot to post any proof o' that?????
.

.​

 

[Phoenix68]

.

.
.

.

.

.​

 

[mark francis]

.
View attachment 14051
.
Gee....lemme guess.....you just forgot to post any proof o' that?????
.

.​

Contrary opinions are not proof.

 

[Boris Norris]

Ignoring the Bible for a moment there is scientific evidence that dinosaurs and humans were alive on earth simultaneously in the ancient past.

If you talking about the dinosaurs that lived 65 million years ago which were wiped out by the asteroid, you are completely wrong and I know you cannot make a connection they both lived at the same time.
That's a classic example how deluded believers want to link religion to proven scientific facts.

The reason so many people today do not know that is because leftists have for decades been scrubbing scientific evidence that contradicts their evolutionist misinterpretations of scientific data.

Why would you believe science? If science proved there was no god, would you believe it? Of course not so why ask for science to prove anything. It's nothing to do with politics.
Democrats don't give a shit about it. You're doing somersaults trying to blend in with it.

One famous example comes to mind. The Piltdown man was fabricated by devout evolutionists in a wicked attempt to 'prove' evolution by producing a fake 'missing link' fossil.

Do you mean how you just tried to link man coexisting with dinosaurs? That must be a republican thought process.

The fossil was received and accepted for decades by millions as if it was real. Piltdown was even mentioned in transcripts of the 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial. Every 'scientific evidence' of evolution mentioned in that trial was later debunked.

And who debunked it? Science itself. Isn't that what science does?

How interesting that the fake Piltdown man was wickedly created in England less than 2 decades after human bones were found mixed with saber tooth tiger bones in the Cattedown Caves in England that devout evolutionists refused to acknowledge because the evidence contradicted well publicized evolutionist narratives of that day.

Interesting that the bones attracted cynicism from science at the beginning. They weren't allowed to conduct there tests so the fraud went uncontested.
Science very quickly proved it false.

The guys who reportedly discovered the bones weren't devour evolutionists but a cabal of archeologists. They made a goose of themselves, not evolution. It was a fact then and is still now.

 

[mark francis]

If you talking about the dinosaurs that lived 65 million years ago which were wiped out by the asteroid, you are completely wrong and I know you cannot make a connection they both lived at the same time.
That's a classic example how deluded believers want to link religion to proven scientific facts.

Secularists are the ones refusing to accept credible age tests showing dinosaur bones to be no older than 50,000 years.

Why would you believe science? If science proved there was no god, would you believe it? Of course not so why ask for science to prove anything. It's nothing to do with politics.
Democrats don't give a shit about it. You're doing somersaults trying to blend in with it.

Interesting that the bones attracted cynicism from science at the beginning. They weren't allowed to conduct there tests so the fraud went uncontested.
Science very quickly proved it false.

The guys who reportedly discovered the bones weren't devour evolutionists but a cabal of archeologists. They made a goose of themselves, not evolution. It was a fact then and is still now.

Refusing to accept test results is not science, it is bias.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Secularists are the ones refusing to accept credible age tests showing dinosaur bones to be no older than 50,000 years.

Refusing to accept test results is not science, it is bias.

There were no tests to prove dinosaurs and humans coexisted.
There was no worldwide flood. There was probably a flood when an earthquake broke the natural dam that separated the Black Sea from the Sea of Marmara (see a map).

Mark knows nothing about how to date dinosaur bones. Ken Ham is some sort of grandstanding nut.

 

[pjmret]

Secularists are the ones refusing to accept credible age tests showing dinosaur bones to be no older than 50,000 years.

Refusing to accept test results is not science, it is bias.

those test results were flawed, i already posted links showing why. duh

The recent discovery of radiocarbon in dinosaur bones at first seems incompatible with an age of millions of years, due to the short half-life of radiocarbon. However, evidence from isotopes other than radiocarbon shows that dinosaur fossils are indeed millions of years old. Fossil bone incorporates new radiocarbon by means of recrystallization and, in some cases, bacterial activity and uranium decay

https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-abstract/82/2/72/109723/Radiocarbon-in-Dinosaur-Fossils-Compatibility-with?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Evidence from isotopes other than radiocarbon shows that dinosaur fossils are millions of years old. Despite that, bone mineral from Mesozoic dinosaur fossils yields a falsely young radiocarbon “date” of less than 50,000 years, due to its accumulation of new radiocarbon via recrystallization. Similarly, the so-called collagen fraction of Mesozoic fossil bone (actually the total organic fraction) yields a falsely young “date,” due to the presence of organic contaminants, including glue that is added during fossil excavation. The contaminants are responsible for the falsely young radiocarbon “date.”

you are a science *****. lol

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

It is perhaps true that Noah loaded some livestock onto a boat, and the myth grew into the Biblical tale. Is every human alive today a descendant of Noah and his family? That is quite unlikely. I would think that geneticists would have the ability to determine that. Thee are a lot of variations between human populations on this planet: Eskimos, Chinese, Dravidians, Pygmies, Berbers, Australian Aborigines, Laplanders, Ainu, and of course Europeans, Middle Easterners, and many different African groups: all descended from eight individuals: Noah, his wife and his three sons and their wives.

 

[Boris Norris]

Secularists are the ones refusing to accept credible age tests showing dinosaur bones to be no older than 50,000 years.

I haven't never refused that. The debate which you support is humans existed at the same time,65 million years ago, with dinosaurs.
That is factual wrong and fossils do NOT prove they cohabitated.
You're very confused.

Refusing to accept test results is not science, it is bias.

If science proved there was no god, you wouldn't accept it because of bias. See how silly you reliance on science is false proof.

 

[mark francis]

There were no tests to prove dinosaurs and humans coexisted.

Secularists have not proven that dinosaurs that roamed the earth less than 50,000 years ago never crossed paths with humans.

 

[mark francis]

those test results were flawed, i already posted links showing why. duh

Of course leftist evolution devotees feel compelled to claim facts that contradict evolution must be flawed.

 

[pjmret]

Of course leftist evolution devotees feel compelled to claim facts that contradict evolution must be flawed.

Nope the flaws in the tests were well documented, science *****

 

[mark francis]

I haven't never refused that. The debate which you support is humans existed at the same time,65 million years ago, with dinosaurs.
That is factual wrong and fossils do NOT prove they cohabitated.

Dinosaurs that roamed the earth less than 50,000 years ago cannot be said to have never crossed paths with humans. Also, evolutionists claim a certain type of saber-toothed tiger went extinct more than 7 million years ago, which cannot be true unless humans also walked on earth more than 7 million years ago, as demonstrated by fossil bones in the Cattedown caves.