Luxembourg calls Trump a “criminal” and “political pyromaniac who should be sent to criminal court”

Werbung:
Did their lawyers testify to congress like trumps did? No? Duh
Democrats have raided Trump's offices and homes and confiscated millions of his documents, something they would never do and have never done in cases involving politicians of their own party. Teams of Trump-hating lawyers poured over every document they had to find some tidbit they felt they could twist into a criminal case against Trump. It is telling that it was the lawyers out to get him that filed charges against him for claims Trump made in banking transactions years earlier that banks did not report as being illegal.
 
I wasn't fooled.
Thousands of your Democrat leaders were not fooled either. They were lying when they said Trump colluded with Russians even though they knew the conspiracy theory was just another Democrat lie designed to take down Trump for being so popular among the majority of real Americans (but not so popular among fake voters who vote illegally in corrupted elections.)
 
Thousands of your Democrat leaders were not fooled either. They were lying when they said Trump colluded with Russians even though they knew the conspiracy theory was just another Democrat lie designed to take down Trump for being so popular among the majority of real Americans (but not so popular among fake voters who vote illegally in corrupted elections.)
No. Not those corrupt democrats again.
Why don't we vote them out.
 
Democrats have raided Trump's offices and homes and confiscated millions of his documents, something they would never do and have never done in cases involving politicians of their own party. Teams of Trump-hating lawyers poured over every document they had to find some tidbit they felt they could twist into a criminal case against Trump. It is telling that it was the lawyers out to get him that filed charges against him for claims Trump made in banking transactions years earlier that banks did not report as being illegal.
Someth8ng they would never do to democrats??
Prove it or admit you lied
But you won't do it
 
Democrats have raided Trump's offices and homes and confiscated millions of his documents, something they would never do and have never done in cases involving politicians of their own party. Teams of Trump-hating lawyers poured over every document they had to find some tidbit they felt they could twist into a criminal case against Trump. It is telling that it was the lawyers out to get him that filed charges against him for claims Trump made in banking transactions years earlier that banks did not report as being illegal.
Banks wouldn't know it was illegal duh
It's not their job to investigate potential crimes
You don't understand much do you lol
 
Someth8ng they would never do to democrats??
Prove it or admit you lied
But you won't do it
Here is an example of the double standard of leftist crackdowns on crime:

A man who was not even in DC on Jan 6 got years in jail for allegedly supporting the J-6 mass opposition to voter fraud, but the guy who murdered a kid simply because he thought the kid might be a Trump supporter got little more than a slap on the hand.

Shannon Brandt gets 5 years in prison for murder of Cayler Ellingson - TheBlaze 9-9-23

North Dakota man sentenced to 5 years in prison for running over, killing teen who he deemed to be a 'Republican extremist'

NEWS
PAUL SACCA
September 09, 2023

Foster County Sheriff/Family Handout
A North Dakota man was sentenced to prison for running over and killing a teen who he deemed to be a "Republican extremist."
 
Here is an example of the double standard of leftist crackdowns on crime:

A man who was not even in DC on Jan 6 got years in jail for allegedly supporting the J-6 mass opposition to voter fraud, but the guy who murdered a kid simply because he thought the kid might be a Trump supporter got little more than a slap on the hand.

Shannon Brandt gets 5 years in prison for murder of Cayler Ellingson - TheBlaze 9-9-23

North Dakota man sentenced to 5 years in prison for running over, killing teen who he deemed to be a 'Republican extremist'

NEWS
PAUL SACCA
September 09, 2023

Foster County Sheriff/Family Handout
A North Dakota man was sentenced to prison for running over and killing a teen who he deemed to be a "Republican extremist."
Keep trying lol
 
Banks wouldn't know it was illegal duh
It's not their job to investigate potential crimes
You don't understand much do you lol
If Trump's business managers said a property was worth more than a Democrat lawyer thought it was worth, who was right? Did a bank lose money because of some alleged Trump lie? No, apparently not. Banks usually sue for reimbursement of funds lost due to fraud and I am unaware of any balks claiming they were defrauded by Trump. Leftist Trump-hating lawyers are claiming what no bank has claimed, based upon leftist assumptions about property values that are never absolute.
 
If Trump's business managers said a property was worth more than a Democrat lawyer thought it was worth, who was right? Did a bank lose money because of some alleged Trump lie? No, apparently not. Banks usually sue for reimbursement of funds lost due to fraud and I am unaware of any balks claiming they were defrauded by Trump. Leftist Trump-hating lawyers are claiming what no bank has claimed, based upon leftist assumptions about property values that are never absolute.
Nah Trump agreed his maralago was worth 28 million for paying property taxesthen said it was worth hundreds of millions for loans
It wasn't a democrat lawyer it was Trump
That's fraud duh
 
You must be joking since you have no proof
I have multiple reports on file of Dominion, Sequoia, and Smartmatic machine corruption. Here is one example of an early Soros-connected voting machine advertised with a built-in feature for committing fraud, for those crooked election officials in the market for something like that:

Button on e-voting machine allows multiple votes – East Bay Times 11-1-06

PUBLISHED November 1, 2006 at 8:54 p.m. | UPDATED: August 17, 2016 at 5:47 a.m.

Days before the election, state officials have learned that California’s most widely used electronic voting machines feature a button in back that can allow someone to vote multiple times.

Several computer scientists said Wednesday that the vulnerability found in all touch-screen machines sold by Oakland-based Sequoia Voting Systems was not especially great because using the yellow button for vote fraud would require reaching far behind the voting machine twice and triggering two beeps.

“If the machine beeps loudly and someone has their arms wrapped around the machine, the poll workers are going to become suspicious,” said David Wagner, a computer security and voting system expert at the University of California, Berkeley.

“It’s kind of hard for me to see how this could be used very widely,” he said. “It’s retail fraud, so it’s onesies and twosies and can only affect very close races.”
 
Last edited:
I have multiple reports on file of Dominion, Sequoia, and Smartmatic machine corruption. Here is one example of an early Soros-connected voting machines advertised with a built-in feature for committing fraud, for those crooked election officials in the market for something like that:

Button on e-voting machine allows multiple votes – East Bay Times 11-1-06

PUBLISHED November 1, 2006 at 8:54 p.m. | UPDATED: August 17, 2016 at 5:47 a.m.

Days before the election, state officials have learned that California’s most widely used electronic voting machines feature a button in back that can allow someone to vote multiple times.

Several computer scientists said Wednesday that the vulnerability found in all touch-screen machines sold by Oakland-based Sequoia Voting Systems was not especially great because using the yellow button for vote fraud would require reaching far behind the voting machine twice and triggering two beeps.

“If the machine beeps loudly and someone has their arms wrapped around the machine, the poll workers are going to become suspicious,” said David Wagner, a computer security and voting system expert at the University of California, Berkeley.

“It’s kind of hard for me to see how this could be used very widely,” he said. “It’s retail fraud, so it’s onesies and twosies and can only affect very close races.”
Just show proof fraud actually occurred
Oh you can't lol
 
Werbung:
If Trump's business managers said a property was worth more than a Democrat lawyer thought it was worth, who was right? Did a bank lose money because of some alleged Trump lie? No, apparently not. Banks usually sue for reimbursement of funds lost due to fraud and I am unaware of any balks claiming they were defrauded by Trump. Leftist Trump-hating lawyers are claiming what no bank has claimed, based upon leftist assumptions about property values that are never absolute.
Trump said his property was physically 3 timesbigger than it was
That's fraud duh
 
Back
Top