little black lying hood told a real whopper

[Randomguy]

What does, “yet Trump supporters” mean? Tell me please.

Is it your claim that “Trump supporters” and “all Trump supporters” are identical?

 

[PamiUSA]

Is it your claim that “Trump supporters” and “all Trump supporters” are identical?

Lol! I cannot even answer that. You must have debated in your school days!

 

[Randomguy]

I am reminded of the addage “at least you have your health.” Often such is a hollow gesture, even sarcastic. The guy has lost his job, his house, all his savings, is homeless, and is told “at least you have your health.” Argh!

So we have a guy who is more or less illiterate and is either a ged or not even high school graduate and keeps giving us (anecdotal) examples of highly educated people who do stupid things. As is that means it is better to be poorly educated. Unbelievable!

And then brags about “common sense.” Like saying “at least I have common sense.”

Lol

 

[Randomguy]

Lol! I cannot even answer that. You must have debated in your school days!

Why, because the answer shows you were wrong? It’s a simple question. Why can’t you answer? You can say, “no.” You can say “yes”. But you were about to be shown wrong and don’t want to continue. So you just say you cannot answer without explaining WHY you cannot answer.

Still, ask why you felt you needed to add “all.”

 

[PamiUSA]

Why, because the answer shows you were wrong? It’s a simple question. Why can’t you answer? You can say, “no.” You can say “yes”. But you were about to be shown wrong and don’t want to continue. So you just say you cannot answer without explaining WHY you cannot answer.

Still, ask why you felt you needed to add “all.”

You were the one to write “supporters”! Plural! Stop making yourself look like you always have to be right. You wrote the sentence, not I!

 

[Randomguy]

You were the one to write “supporters”! Plural! Stop making yourself look like you always have to be right. You write the sentence, not I!

Saywut? That could be 2 or more.

Why are your responses never direct responses? Can’t you just answer the simple question? Or at least say WHY you cannot answer the simple question. Lol

 

[PamiUSA]

Saywut? That could be 2 or more.

Why are your responses never direct responses? Can’t you just answer the simple question? Or at least say WHY you cannot answer the simple question. Lol

And it could be all! You should written it specifically what you wanted to say or mean.

 

[Randomguy]

And it could be all! You should written it specifically what you wanted to say or mean.

So you admit it could be two or it could be all. And you assumed “all”. Why assume? Why not ask?

But I agree, I could have been more clear and have “added “some” or “a lot of” or “most” etc.

Still you did not directly answer the original question but indirectly admitted the answer to the original question is a “no.”

 

[Randomguy]

You must have debated in your school days!

I am not sure if you meant that as a negative thing but I take it as a compliment. Thanks.

 

[PamiUSA]

So you admit it could be two or it could be all. And you assumed “all”. Why assume? Why not ask?

But I agree, I could have been more clear and have “added “some” or “a lot of” or “most” etc.

Lol! You are something else! I did not assume.
You were not specific, so “supporters” means ….supporters!

 

[Randomguy]

Lol! You are something else! I did not assume.
You were not specific, so “supporters” means ….supporters!

Yes, supporters mean supporters. We agree on that. And you admitted it could mean two. So what’s wrong? And why did you add “all” again?

 

[PamiUSA]

Yes, supporters mean supporters. We agree on that. And you admitted it could mean two. So what’s wrong? And why did you add “all” again?

All where?

 

[Randomguy]

All where?

Argh! I have mentioned that several times and now you ask this. But I indulge: look at your post 44. There is only one “all” there.

You already conceded my comment could apply to only 2 supporters. So you already have conceded the point. So why continue?

 

[PamiUSA]

Argh! I have mentioned that several times and now you ask this. But I indulge: look at your post 44. There is only one “all” there.

You already conceded my comment could apply to only 2 supporters. So you already have conceded the point. So why continue?

Lol! Your words, not mine. Watch how you use it in a sentence in the future as a noun. Nope, no need to continue. As a Trump supporter, I read it as supporters! Not one.. or two, or some or many. Got it?

 

[Randomguy]

Lol! Your words, not mine. Watch how you use it in a sentence in the future as a noun.

What? What is “it”? And what “noun”? I have no idea what you are talking about.

Nope, no need to continue. As a Trump supporter, I read it as supporters! Not one.. or two, or some or many. Got it?

I never said one but said two. And I agreed supporter is supporters. And you already agreed it could have meant 2. So again why are you continuing with this and why did you use “all” in you comment?

Why can’t you answer direct and simple questions?